Related Content
- Nosferatu: Phantom der Nacht
DVD Video Review - Sunrise
DVD Video Review - The Last Laugh
DVD Video Review - Nosferatu: Phantom der Nacht
DVD Video Review - Tartuffe
DVD Video Review - Faust
DVD Video Review - Tabu - A Story of the South Seas
DVD Video Review - Nosferatu
DVD Video Review - Der Letzte Mann (The Last Laugh)
DVD Video Review - Sunrise: A Song of Two Humans (Masters of Cinema 2-disc edition)
DVD Video Review
Disc Specs
- Region:
0 - Released:
19 October 2009 - Country:
United Kingdom - Running Time:
119/78 minutes - Screen Format:
1.33:1 Non-Anamorphic PAL - Discs / Sides / Layers:
2 / 1 / Dual - Soundtracks:
Music score in Dolby Surround (Phantom), Dolby Digital 2.0 Stereo (Die Finanzen) - Subtitles:
German intertitles
English subtitles (optional) - Special Features:
Audio commentary on Die Finanzen...
Booklet - Distributor:
Eureka/Masters of Cinema
Phantom/Die Finanzen des Groβherzogs
21-10-2009 12:00 | 2365 views | Gary Couzens | Show Backlinks | Other "The Masters of Cinema Series" Content
Friedrich Wilhelm Murnau (1888-1931) is best known and most celebrated for films such as Nosferatu (1922), The Last Laugh, Sunrise: A Song of Two Humans and Tabu. He is one of the great masters of silent cinema and of visual storytelling. As his career developed, he would pare down the number of intertitles to the point where, in The Last Laugh and Tabu there are respectively one and none at all, apart from on-screen printed text. In this he was an influence on such directors as Hitchcock and the Anthony Asquith of A Cottage on Dartmoor. As the sound era dawned, Murnau, like Charles Chaplin, was reluctant to abandon this kind of purely visual filmmaking. His last film, Tabu has no spoken dialogue, its only concession to the new technology being a synchronised music and effects track. It’s fascinating to imagine how he would have dealt with the demands of talking pictures, as Chaplin had to do, if he had not died in a road accident.
Yet Murnau was much more prolific than that – he had three films released in 1922 alone - though as many of his films are lost or incomplete it’s no longer possible to have a full picture of his career. However, Masters of Cinema have commendably released several of his films on DVD, and they continue with this double-set of two of his lesser-known ones. While neither of them can be called top-flight Murnau – both are essentially genre pieces, namely a road-to-ruin melodrama and a comedy – both are certainly worth seeing and Murnau admirers should not hesitate. Both star or feature Alfred Abel, and were written by Thea Von Harbou, both best known these days for Metropolis, directed by Von Harbou’s husband, Fritz Lang.

Phantom, made in 1922 just after Nosferatu, unfolds in flashback and is divided into six acts. Lorenz Lahota (Abel) is a clerk who wants to be a poet. One day he is knocked down by a woman, Veronika (Lya De Putti) riding two horses. From that day on he becomes obsessed by the mysterious woman, an obsession that leads to his downfall.
Phantom was produced for Erich Pommer’s Decla company, whose most famous production was The Cabinet of Dr Caligari three years earlier. That film’s female lead, Lil Dagover, plays Lorenz’s faithful companion Marie in the opening and closing scenes. Phantom shares some of the earlier film’s expressionist style in its depiction of Lorenz’s descent into debauchery and madness. Lya De Putti plays a double role, her other one being Mellitta, a woman who comes into Lorenz’s life due to her resemblance to the elusive Veronika.

Die Finanzen des Großherzogs (The Grand Duke’s Finances) was made in 1924. Compared to the darkness of Phantom, this excursion into comedy may come as a surprise. It takes place in the Duchy of Abacco, which is is in dire financial straits. The Grand Duke (Harry Liedtke) plans to marry the Grand Duchess of Russia (Mady Christians), but other people have other plans. The film shows Murnau’s love of location filming, here in what was then Yugoslavia but is now Croatia. Alfred Abel turns up again, this time playing conman Philipp Collins, and Nosferatu himself, Max Schreck, appears in a small role. Working as a designer, though uncredited on the present print, was future director Edgar G. Ulmer, though as that appears to be mainly if not entirely from Ulmer’s own perhaps unreliable testimony, that fact should be accepted with some caution.
Both films are very well photographed. This is the work of Axel Graatkjaer and Theophan Ouchakoff on Phantom and two men who would become major DPs in Hollywood, Karl Freund and Franz Planer, on Die Finanzen….
You can’t make too many claims for these two films. Murnau made his first feature in 1919 and continued at a very prolific rate: Phantom was released three years later and was Murnau’s twelfth feature, while Die Finanzen… was his fourteenth. Some of the films from this period are now lost, as Phantom was until its restoration in 2006. The version of Die Finanzen… that survives is shorter than the film was originally, according to some by as much as thirty minures. While no doubt we should be grateful that they exist while others don’t, both films reward the attention, especially for admirers of the director.
Phantom and Die Finanzen des Großherzogs make up numbers 84 and 85 in Eureka’s Masters of Cinema series. The set comprises two DVD-9s, both encoded for all regions.
Both films are shown in versions restored by the Friedrich Wilhelm Murnau Stiftung, with music scores and tinted mostly throughout. (Some scenes in Phantom remain in black and white.) Given these films’ history, and the simple fact that these films are over eighty-five years old, the restoration is remarkable: contrast, so vital in black and white let alone tinted black and white like this, is excellent. Also, the film is transferred at the correct speed. There’s inevitable flickering, but that’s what silent films do.
Phantom has an orchestral score, composed and conducted by Robert Israel, and presented on the DVD in Dolby Digital 2.0, which plays as Surround in ProLogic mode. Die Finanzen…, by contrast, uses solo piano, played by Ekkehard Wölk, and presented in stereo. The intertitles are in the original German (those included as part of the restoration can be identified by the letters FWMS in the bottom left corner) with optional English subtitles to translate them.
The only on-disc extra is a commentary by David Kalat for Die Finanzen…. This is a thorough and informative talk, which covers all the bases: the film’s production and its place in Murnau’s career, and the contributions of the cast and principal crew members. Interestingly, Kalat runs counter to the idea that Murnau’s lack of dependence on intertitles was a gradual progression throughout his career, but rather something influenced by whether or not Thea Von Harbou was writing the film, as her screenplays tended to be verbose and her adaptations (both of these are such) overly literal. Kalat points out that other directors were making films that could have done without intertitles – he cites comedy shorts that have had theirs removed and still make perfect sense – except that intertitles were such a given for a silent film that it took directors like Murnau to do things a little differently.
Masters of Cinema’s booklet contains a long and thorough essay, “Murnau at the Crossroads” by Janet Bergstrom, which discusses both films. The booklet also includes film credits and many production stills and ends with a reproduction of a handbill for Phantom.
Yet Murnau was much more prolific than that – he had three films released in 1922 alone - though as many of his films are lost or incomplete it’s no longer possible to have a full picture of his career. However, Masters of Cinema have commendably released several of his films on DVD, and they continue with this double-set of two of his lesser-known ones. While neither of them can be called top-flight Murnau – both are essentially genre pieces, namely a road-to-ruin melodrama and a comedy – both are certainly worth seeing and Murnau admirers should not hesitate. Both star or feature Alfred Abel, and were written by Thea Von Harbou, both best known these days for Metropolis, directed by Von Harbou’s husband, Fritz Lang.
Phantom, made in 1922 just after Nosferatu, unfolds in flashback and is divided into six acts. Lorenz Lahota (Abel) is a clerk who wants to be a poet. One day he is knocked down by a woman, Veronika (Lya De Putti) riding two horses. From that day on he becomes obsessed by the mysterious woman, an obsession that leads to his downfall.
Phantom was produced for Erich Pommer’s Decla company, whose most famous production was The Cabinet of Dr Caligari three years earlier. That film’s female lead, Lil Dagover, plays Lorenz’s faithful companion Marie in the opening and closing scenes. Phantom shares some of the earlier film’s expressionist style in its depiction of Lorenz’s descent into debauchery and madness. Lya De Putti plays a double role, her other one being Mellitta, a woman who comes into Lorenz’s life due to her resemblance to the elusive Veronika.
Die Finanzen des Großherzogs (The Grand Duke’s Finances) was made in 1924. Compared to the darkness of Phantom, this excursion into comedy may come as a surprise. It takes place in the Duchy of Abacco, which is is in dire financial straits. The Grand Duke (Harry Liedtke) plans to marry the Grand Duchess of Russia (Mady Christians), but other people have other plans. The film shows Murnau’s love of location filming, here in what was then Yugoslavia but is now Croatia. Alfred Abel turns up again, this time playing conman Philipp Collins, and Nosferatu himself, Max Schreck, appears in a small role. Working as a designer, though uncredited on the present print, was future director Edgar G. Ulmer, though as that appears to be mainly if not entirely from Ulmer’s own perhaps unreliable testimony, that fact should be accepted with some caution.
Both films are very well photographed. This is the work of Axel Graatkjaer and Theophan Ouchakoff on Phantom and two men who would become major DPs in Hollywood, Karl Freund and Franz Planer, on Die Finanzen….
You can’t make too many claims for these two films. Murnau made his first feature in 1919 and continued at a very prolific rate: Phantom was released three years later and was Murnau’s twelfth feature, while Die Finanzen… was his fourteenth. Some of the films from this period are now lost, as Phantom was until its restoration in 2006. The version of Die Finanzen… that survives is shorter than the film was originally, according to some by as much as thirty minures. While no doubt we should be grateful that they exist while others don’t, both films reward the attention, especially for admirers of the director.
The DVDs
Phantom and Die Finanzen des Großherzogs make up numbers 84 and 85 in Eureka’s Masters of Cinema series. The set comprises two DVD-9s, both encoded for all regions.
Both films are shown in versions restored by the Friedrich Wilhelm Murnau Stiftung, with music scores and tinted mostly throughout. (Some scenes in Phantom remain in black and white.) Given these films’ history, and the simple fact that these films are over eighty-five years old, the restoration is remarkable: contrast, so vital in black and white let alone tinted black and white like this, is excellent. Also, the film is transferred at the correct speed. There’s inevitable flickering, but that’s what silent films do.
Phantom has an orchestral score, composed and conducted by Robert Israel, and presented on the DVD in Dolby Digital 2.0, which plays as Surround in ProLogic mode. Die Finanzen…, by contrast, uses solo piano, played by Ekkehard Wölk, and presented in stereo. The intertitles are in the original German (those included as part of the restoration can be identified by the letters FWMS in the bottom left corner) with optional English subtitles to translate them.
The only on-disc extra is a commentary by David Kalat for Die Finanzen…. This is a thorough and informative talk, which covers all the bases: the film’s production and its place in Murnau’s career, and the contributions of the cast and principal crew members. Interestingly, Kalat runs counter to the idea that Murnau’s lack of dependence on intertitles was a gradual progression throughout his career, but rather something influenced by whether or not Thea Von Harbou was writing the film, as her screenplays tended to be verbose and her adaptations (both of these are such) overly literal. Kalat points out that other directors were making films that could have done without intertitles – he cites comedy shorts that have had theirs removed and still make perfect sense – except that intertitles were such a given for a silent film that it took directors like Murnau to do things a little differently.
Masters of Cinema’s booklet contains a long and thorough essay, “Murnau at the Crossroads” by Janet Bergstrom, which discusses both films. The booklet also includes film credits and many production stills and ends with a reproduction of a handbill for Phantom.



Comments
Where are the British filmmakers?
Posts: 117
Member
Posts: 1
Member
Posts: 650
But even then it only seems to be quantitative in terms of individual items - I don't think anyone would seriously argue that MoC's release doesn't wipe the floor with the other two in terms of sheer volume of contextual information. And high-quality info by leading scholars at that.
Contributor
Posts: 380
If I had my way, I wouldn't put star ratings on my reviews as they lead to arguments like this. A film I give an 8 to isn't necessarily "better" than a 7 or a 6 or "worse" than a 9 or 10, as much depends on the reader's personal tastes regarding genre etc. I haven't the time or inclination to go through the 801 reviews I have on this site, but I suspect you'll find I give very few 10s. If something meets expectations, then it won't get full marks; for me to earn a 10 in whatever category a DVD has to exceed expectations. For example, a film made in the last few years, transferred from a hi-def master, would probably get a 9 for "video" from me, though for all intents and purposes it may have a flawless transfer. On the other hand, a film like La signora di tutti, which has one of the best transfers I've ever seen for a film of its vintage (1934) and, black and white photography apart, looks like it was shot yesterday, got a video score of 10 from me.
As for extras, quantity does come into it. A disc with just a trailer as an extra would get a 1 from me. But yes, I do consider quality as well. OI think my review adequately conveys that about Kalat's commentary, and I've tweaked the final paragraph slightly to clarify my comments on Bergstrom's essay. On reconsideration, I've raised the extras score to 4: two extras, double marks for each.
Member
Posts: 27
Member
Posts: 2
Masters of Cinema books generally tend to be filled with dull essays that are usually printed on their website anyway.
Most of their commentaries are also very dull presented by elitist knobheads who try to make themselves appear smart and erudite with their laughable suggestions of symbolism and reciting every film and art student cliche.
Read any interview by their ringleader Nick Wrigley and you'll see how up their own arse they are. The whole outfit comes off as a matual self-pleasuring clique. It's a shame because they have released some wonderful films and the only way to get them is to buy their ridiculously overpriced DVDs.
The Duck
Posts: 737
Member
Posts: 650
Member
Posts: 185
..the only way to get them is to buy their ridiculously overpriced DVDs.
I've got about twenty of their DVDs. The last one I got was La Guele Ouverte. Great pic and sound and absolutely packed with extras. Cost me £11.99. I call that a bargain, not ridiculously overpriced.
MoC exist because people buy their DVDs. If sales were small, they would go out of business. I doubt elitism is a part of their business plans. If anything, they want to popularise these great films.
My favourite of their DVDs are the two Peter Watkins releases. The accompanying booklets contain brilliant essays by Watkins himself and Watkins' biographer Joseph Gomez. They greatly enhanced my appreciation of the films.
Member
Posts: 650
One aspect of the work of the more conscientious DVD labels that isn't often highlighted by reviewers is the amount of work they put into improving what were often mediocre or downright terrible subtitles on a film's original theatrical release - often because they were knocked out incredibly quickly to meet a festival deadline and then not redone for the subsequent theatrical outing.
A particularly outstanding recent example is MoC's Une femme mariée, whose subtitles do about as good a job as is conceivable with a film that frequently combines onscreen French text with spoken content - including intelligent onscreen placement. I don't have a copy of the original theatrical print to hand, but I'd be amazed if it went to anything like the same lengths. Reviews of that release have generally stressed the amazing 80-page book, for understandable reasons, but the new subtitles are arguably just as important.
Contributor
Posts: 380
I'm not sure what you're getting at here. If you mean, where are the British silents on DVD, that's a question that should be asked of DVD labels. Certainly the BFI have issued some - films like A Cottage on Dartmoor (reviewed by me for this site) and compilation discs such as Silent Shakespeare and the R.W. Paul films. The Life Story of David Lloyd George (1918) is available, and highly rated by those who have seen it (I haven't). And I've reviewed seven of Hitchcock's nine silents for this site as well.
Also, I don't know how many other British silent features survive in the archives, and in what condition.
Member
Posts: 650
But to answer your question anyway, there are plenty of surviving British silent features in the archives, especially from the 1920s, but by their very nature such DVD projects are disproportionately expensive (they often need restoration, and the soundtrack issue complicates matters further), and with the best will in the world they're unlikely to attract more than a tiny audience once you stray off the beaten track.
And it helps enormously if a project has a good story attached, which is certainly the case with the long-believed-destroyed The Life Story of David Lloyd George. I've seen it and it's surprisingly gripping - and I can thoroughly recommend the Welsh National Archives DVD.