Michael Mackenzie's Top 10 HD Transfers of 2008

01-01-2009 13:30 | 8728 views  |  Michael Mackenzie  |  Show Backlinks

2008 has been quite a year for high definition. In addition to the emergence of Blu-ray as the clear winner of the format war with HD DVD, it has seen the steady growth of HD as a mass market option, with sales becoming increasingly healthy – aided, no doubt, by the release of high profile titles like The Godfather trilogy and The Dark Knight. That the latter shifted some 1.7 million copies in its first week, accounting for 13% of the film’s sales on home video, demonstrates that Blu-ray is well on the way to becoming a format not just for AV and cinema enthusiasts but also for the general public.

That said, I personally am first and foremost an enthusiast, and I aim my writing at other enthusiasts. While plenty of viewers (and that includes “professional” reviewers!) have been overwhelmingly happy with the majority of the format’s output, it has never been my style to sugar-coat or forgive flaws on the grounds that “it looks good enough”. I’ve a tendency to be pretty vocal in my criticism of discs which don’t pass muster, and as a result much of what I write can come across as negative. The current situation with Blu-ray, as far as transfers go, is infinitely better than it ever was with DVD, but at the same time there is a long way still to go. Studios must be discouraged from using invasive detail and grain reduction filters, the results of which have utterly ruined celebrated classics released this year such as Dark City and Patton. Even what was arguably this year’s biggest release, The Dark Knight, was not immune to such tampering, arriving in our homes in a noticeably compromised state. In many cases, the mangled masters that have been created for these films will continue to be used for years to come, so it is imperative that we remain vigilant as to these practices and continue to be vocal in our disapproval as to their use.

However, the main purpose of this article is not to catalogue crimes but to celebrate successes. When all said and done, 2008 was a great year, for both older titles and new releases. Without further ado, therefore, I present you with my personal picks for the ten best HD transfers of the last twelve months, based on the titles I personally had the good fortune to see. Please bear in mind that I didn’t even come close to watching every title releases, so if a transfer you think is particularly good isn’t here, it may be that I simply haven’t seen it. It’s also worth pointing out that there were so many good releases that, in narrowing the list down to a mere ten titles, some sterling efforts have invariably been overlooked.

Click any of the images below to enlarge them to their full resolution.



10. Zodiac
Paramount – AVC




9. Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull
Paramount – AVC




8. How the West was Won
Warner – VC-1




7. The Godfather Part III
Paramount – AVC




6. Doomsday
Universal – VC-1




5. Across the Universe
Sony Pictures – AVC




4. Wall-E
Buena Vista – AVC




3. Enchanted
Buena Vista – AVC




2. Resident Evil: Extinction
Sony Pictures – AVC




1. I, Robot
20th Century Fox – AVC



Honourable mentions (best first): Transformers (Paramount – AVC), Gone Baby Gone (Buena Vista – AVC), Juno (20th Century Fox – AVC), The Life Before Her Eyes (Magnolia – AVC), Persepolis (Sony Pictures – AVC), Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street (Warner – VC-1), La Femme Nikita (Sony Pictures – AVC), The Omen (20th Century Fox – AVC), Night of the Living Dead (Optimum – AVC)

Biggest disappointments (worst first): Escape from New York (Optimum – AVC, standard definition upconvert), Night of the Werewolf/Vengeance of the Zombies (BCI – AVC), Gangs of New York (Buena Vista – VC-1), Salò, or the 120 Days of Sodom (BFI – AVC), Dark City (New Line – VC-1), Strictly Ballroom (ITV – VC-1)

Feel free to reply with your own personal picks!

Comments

#1 Posted: 01-01-2009 13:50
Michael Brooke
Member
Posts: 601

Report this post
I'm guessing you haven't seen Baraka - currently my Blu-ray demo disc.
Quote this post
#2 Posted: 01-01-2009 13:52
Michael Mackenzie
Contributor
Posts: 1645

Report this post
No, I've seen it. I just don't consider it to be as good as the titles listed above, and I certainly wouldn't class it as demo material, unless one is able to ignore the disc's technical shortcomings and concentrate solely on the cinematography.
------

Reviews | DVDs | My Web Site

Quote this post
#3 Posted: 01-01-2009 16:49
filmfan316uk
Member
Posts: 388

Report this post
Quote:
No, I've seen it. I just don't consider it to be as good as the titles listed above, and I certainly wouldn't class it as demo material, unless one is able to ignore the disc's technical shortcomings and concentrate solely on the cinematography.


Good list. I am glad someone else does not rate Baraka as demo material.

I think Predator 2 whilst not worthy of the top ten would get a mention from me of a decent job considering the source. (Predator 2 is region free with all the 2 disc UK SE extras for those that didn't know it was out like I didn't until 2 weeks back)

I agree with you 100% over I Robot being the best transfer of 2008. Its an stunner and the soundtrack is great as well.

Its a pity not many people will see it as its not a very popular film.

Since you have seen La Femme Nikita could you please tell me with it has the French track and if the subtitles are accurate. I know the old R1 DVD had problems with some of the translation. Thanks

Happy New Year to all

Quote this post
#4 Posted: 01-01-2009 16:51
filmfan316uk
Member
Posts: 388

Report this post
Also may I add that I would love an end to DNR and the like on BD in 2009 as it ruins transfers.
Quote this post
#5 Posted: 01-01-2009 18:29
RisingSun
Member
Posts: 448

Report this post
Can't really argue with you with that selection (with the ones I've seen anyway), except I don't remember any of the Godfather movies looking as good as your screenshot!

Well, as least you left out Part I and II.
Quote this post
#6 Posted: 01-01-2009 18:32
David Mackenzie
ISF Certified
Posts: 356

Report this post
RisingSun: it sounds like your display isn't calibrated?
Quote this post
#7 Posted: 01-01-2009 18:43
RisingSun
Member
Posts: 448

Report this post
No it's not my display. I guess I just didn't think much of the Godfather release.
Quote this post
#8 Posted: 01-01-2009 18:54
David Mackenzie
ISF Certified
Posts: 356

Report this post
Make sure whoever owns it gets it calibrated then!
Quote this post
#9 Posted: 01-01-2009 19:21
RisingSun
Member
Posts: 448

Report this post
No, I meant it is my display, but there's nothing wrong with my display and picture settings!
I just didn't like the BD Godfather picture!

Happy New Year to both of you brothers, BTW! :)

Quote this post
#10 Posted: 02-01-2009 02:00
chris21
Member
Posts: 187

Report this post

Great article, Michael. I enjoyed it. I can't say whether I agree or not as I haven't seen any of your top 10, but I find your high recommendations of certain titles encouraging, as they are discs I will soon be adding to my collection.

Happy new year:)

Quote this post
#11 Posted: 02-01-2009 02:02
chris21
Member
Posts: 187

Report this post

Is it common knowldege that AVC transfers are better? Or is it just coincidence that 8 of the top 10 are AVC?

Quote this post
#12 Posted: 02-01-2009 10:24
Michael Mackenzie
Contributor
Posts: 1645

Report this post
filmfan316uk:

To tell the truth, I wasn't familiar with Nikita prior to seeing it on BD, so I'm probably not the best person to ask about the subtitles. Could you give me a specific example of a translation on the previous DVD being inaccurate and I could check it against the BD?


chris21:

I suspect it has more to do with the fact that the majority of the studios are now using AVC. In fact, Warner seems to be the only label consistently sticking with VC-1, and a lot of their output tends to be fairly mediocre - again, I suspect because of their internal decisions regarding quality of masters and filtering/NR etc., rather than because of any inherent flaw in VC-1. I can't claim to be an expert on the ins and outs of the various codecs, except to say that I've seen some stunning looking VC-1 titles and some not so stunning AVC ones.

Happy New Year to you too. :)
Quote this post
#13 Posted: 03-01-2009 17:24
Shaun666
Member
Posts: 55

Report this post
I'm curious to know what you find so objectionable about Dark City that you consider it to be "ruined"
Quote this post
#14 Posted: 03-01-2009 17:32
Michael Mackenzie
Contributor
Posts: 1645

Report this post
Shaun666:

The fact that it now looks like Madame Tussaud's. I can think of very few other examples of noise reduction that are this bad.
------

Reviews | DVDs | My Web Site

Quote this post
#15 Posted: 03-01-2009 17:56
Shaun666
Member
Posts: 55

Report this post
Funny, I can't say I noticed it while I was watching the film. Maybe I was too busy just enjoying it.
Quote this post
#16 Posted: 04-01-2009 16:50
filmfan316uk
Member
Posts: 388

Report this post
Thanks Michael.

The old R1 disc had dubtitles. If you watch the film with the subtitles and English you will be able to tell as teh English dub is a bit off.
Quote this post
#17 Posted: 04-01-2009 17:02
Michael Mackenzie
Contributor
Posts: 1645

Report this post
Shaun666:

I'm not really sure what to say, other than that, to me, such an attitude would seem to negate the entire point of high definition. And standard definition DVD as well, come to that. It certainly seems a bit misplaced in a thread whose purpose is to celebrate the greatest achievements of the format.


filmfam316uk:

Just checked the first scene (where Nikita and the thugs are breaking into the store), and the subtitles and the dub are off by a considerable margin. For example, "Great, I bet you know where to find the stuff, then we won't wast a second, huh?" is subtitled as "Great. You show us round and we lose no time, okay?", and "Gotta have it" as "I need it." My French isn't spotless enough to verify the accuracy of the subs, but they're certainly not dubtitles.
------

Reviews | DVDs | My Web Site

Quote this post
#18 Posted: 04-01-2009 19:43
Shaun666
Member
Posts: 55

Report this post
I don't know whether you're watching on a projector based set up where perhaps the faults you see are more obvious but I'm watching on a PS3 and Panasonic 50" tv and I find no problem with the disc at all.

To describe Dark City as having been ruined and the actors looking like they've stepped out of Madame Tussaud's is quite frankly ludicrous and not borne out at all by my experience of watching the disc on my set up.
Quote this post
#19 Posted: 04-01-2009 20:32
RisingSun
Member
Posts: 448

Report this post
Some people don't like the grain being removed and I can understand to a point, but I wouldn't go as far to say that the people now look clear as wax or something.

One review I did disagree with Michael was that the removal of grain in Sleeping Beauty. I thought if ever grain is to be removed and a picture needs polishing up it's in a old animation, where now ever cell can be seen clearly. So I am glad that Blu-ray title is praised nearly everywhere!
Quote this post
#20 Posted: 04-01-2009 20:47
David Mackenzie
ISF Certified
Posts: 356

Report this post
Quote:
Is it common knowldege that AVC transfers are better? Or is it just coincidence that 8 of the top 10 are AVC?


AVC encoding of the video transfer is becoming common because there are more encoding and authoring products geared around it. It's basically becoming the de facto standard.

There is no hard and fast rule, a bad AVC encode will be worse than a good VC-1 (and sometimes even MPEG-2) one, etc.

Quote:
To describe Dark City as having been ruined and the actors looking like they've stepped out of Madame Tussaud's is quite frankly ludicrous

Dark City has been subjected to heavy grain reduction which has eradicated high frequency content from the image. So, I wouldn't be as creative as "Madame Tussauds" myself, but it's absolutely sub-par.
Quote this post
#21 Posted: 05-01-2009 03:31
filmfan316uk
Member
Posts: 388

Report this post
Thanks Michael.

The old R1 release from years back had the subs and the English dub matching word for word. Thankfully the Blu-ray is not like that. Will go order this.

DNR and wax

DNR gets rid of fine detail when it gets rid of the grain. It does leave some films with the actors looking a bit waxy. Compare a good none tampered with transfer to a tampered with one and you will see the difference.
Quote this post
#22 Posted: 05-01-2009 03:36
filmfan316uk
Member
Posts: 388

Report this post
AVP 2 is another great transfer from 2008. Its dark a lot of the tme but it still an impressive transfer. The film is a bit of a mindless guilty pleasure of mine. The unrated cut does not add much so those with the UK region B release, you are not missing much.
Quote this post
#23 Posted: 05-01-2009 10:04
Shaun666
Member
Posts: 55

Report this post
Quote:
I'm not really sure what to say, other than that, to me, such an attitude would seem to negate the entire point of high definition. And standard definition DVD as well, come to that. It certainly seems a bit misplaced in a thread whose purpose is to celebrate the greatest achievements of the format.


My attitude is based purely on what I see when viewing Dark City on my home set-up. The Blu Ray is a massive improvement over the original R1 DVD in every respect and looks very good with no evidence of the problems you claim to see. Since I'm viewing it on a 50" tv many people will be viewing it on smaller sets so may well be even less likely to see the faults you say exist. Since you've not stated how you viewed it we can only guess at why you think this disc is so bad which, incidentally, flies in the face of many other reviews of the disc.
Quote this post
#24 Posted: 05-01-2009 17:08
mentasm
Member
Posts: 142

Report this post
To be fair to David, there has been a lot of discussion about the DNR employed on Dark City and most of the reviews I've read have mentioned it as a negative. I haven't seen the BD myself, but the DVD does have a similar look. As for which codec is 'better', it's largely dependant on the encoding. Both can produce excellent results. I've read claims that VC-1 is better at lower bitrates than AVC, but I don't work in the industry so I couldn't comment on that. I've seen good and bad things from both. Hell, I've even seen good MPEG-2 encodes.

As for transfers of the year, I also liked Indy, Resident Evil (well, not the film, but you catch my drift), WALL-E (probably my favourite disc of the year), Kung Fu Panda, 300 (faithful to the film), Iron Man and The Clone Wars. I have yet to get around to Enchanted, either volume of Kill Bill or the Godfather films, but I don't remember being that impressed with Across the Universe. It's odd really, because assessing quality shouldn't be a subjective thing, but one's own preference comes into play more than you'd think.
Quote this post
#25 Posted: 05-01-2009 22:15
SimonI
Member
Posts: 81

Report this post
I haven't seen a lot of hi def disks yet but of this year's crop I'd rate Sleeping Beauty, the first Mummy film, A Nightmare before Christmas and Close Encounters (was that this year?) as things of wonder. Most disappointing disk in terms of PQ was a rental of Hitch - strangely it looked OK but suffered from small but distinct motion blurring which made facial details in particular disappear.
Quote this post

Page: 1, 2