Disc Specs
- Region:
ALL - Released:
Out now - Country:
United States of America - Running Time:
111 minutes approx/137 minutes - Screen Format:
2.39:1 / 1080P / AVC/H.264/MPEG4 - Discs / Type:
1 / BD50 - Soundtracks:
- English PCM 5.1
- English DD 5.1
- French DD 5.1 - Subtitles:
- English
- Spanish
- Chinese
- Korean
- Japanese
- French (Volume 1 only) - Special Features:
Volume 1:
- The Making of Kill Bill Volume 1
- The "5, 6, 7, 8's" Bonus Musical Performances
- Tarantino Trailers
Volume 2:
- The Making of Kill Bill Volume 2
- "Damoe" Deleted Scene
- "Chingon" Musical Performance - Distributor:
Buena Vista
Film Specs
- Certificate:
R - Released:
2003-2004 - Country:
United States of America - Director:
Quentin Tarantino - Starring:
Uma Thurman
David Carradine
Lucy Liu
Vivica A. Fox
Daryl Hannah
Michael Madsen
Julie Dreyfus
Chiaki Kuriyama
Sonny Chiba
Gordon Liu
Michael Parks - Genre(s):
Action
Blockbuster
Cult
Exploitation
Film
Live Action
Martial Arts

Kill Bill: Volumes 1 and 2
02-10-2008 22:00 | 9183 views | Michael Mackenzie | Show Backlinks | Other "Kill Bill" Content
The Films
“You’re not a bad person. You’re a terrific person. You’re my favourite person. But every once in a while, you can be a real cunt.” - Bill
I originally wrote about Kill Bill Volumes 1 and 2 separately, the first before the second had even been released. Looking back at these older reviews, they have their strengths and weaknesses, but most crucially they lack one major factor: an appreciation of the bigger picture. Obviously, the benefit of hindsight is a wonderful thing, and I would like to take this opportunity to reappraise Quentin Tarantino’s blood-soaked homage to 60s and 70s Eastern and Western genre cinema as a whole rather than as two self-contained volumes. With the so-called “Whole Bloody Affair” (which combines both parts into a single four-hour epic) still not having seen the light of day outside of a handful of screenings at select theatrical venues, viewing the two individual episodes back to back would seem to constitute the current best way of appreciating what Tarantino originally intended.
To recap, the plot is conventional B-movie revenge fare: the unnamed Bride (Uma Thurman) awakens from a four-year coma caused by a bullet to the head from her former boss, the eponymous Bill (David Carradine), in collusion with his Deadly Viper Assassination Squad, of which the Bride was formerly a member. Having massacred her friends and husband to be, taken her unborn child and left her for dead, the perpetrators are understandably due for some grim retribution. And retribution doesn’t come much grimmer than that which the Bride exacts, setting forth to cut a bloody swathe through all and sundry that stand in the way of the ultimate target of her vengeance: Bill himself.
Kill Bill ably demonstrates both Tarantino’s weaknesses and strengths as a filmmaker. On the downside, he is unrelentingly self-indulgent, and there is some validity to the oft-levelled accusation that he really needs to get himself a new editor: pacing across the board is problematic, with a number of scenes going on for so long as to become tedious. Oddly enough, this is more problematic in Volume 1, which many cite as the more involving of the two. This is partly because of the juxtaposition between bursts of intense action (such as the justly lauded House of Blue Leaves fight sequence which serves as the first instalment’s climax and main action set-piece) and the slower, more leaden moments where Tarantino allows the action to grind to a halt so he can indulge in dreary, overwritten conversations or needlessly extended detours into the back-stories of incidental characters. In comparison, Volume 2 operates at a considerably slower pace across the board, lingering on locales and characters’ facial expressions, particularly during stand-offs, much like the westerns (both American and Italian) it is referencing. As a result, the tempo is more measured, and the fact that the real meat of the plot and characterisation is concentrated in the second half means that the slower scenes carry more dramatic weight than those in Volume 1.
On the upside, Tarantino really is the undisputed master of the homage, able to cherry-pick motifs from a wide variety of sources and somehow assemble them all into a single, cohesive whole. There’s a such level of panache in the execution as to leave you in no doubt that the man behind the camera has a genuine love for each and every film, television show or pop song he has cribbed from, no matter how obscure or superficially tawdry the source materials might be. Occasionally, he comes dangerously close to stepping over the line which separates homage from parody (the Pai Mei training sequence in Volume 2, entertaining as it is, does have a somewhat snide tone), but for the most part Kill Bill has a sincerity that belies that fact that it is essentially a collection of characters, lines and scenes re-sampled from films that most of the audience has never heard of, let alone seen. It’s tempting to view Tarantino as the film world’s equivalent of a DJ, re-appropriating and remixing other artists’ handiwork, and at times his choice of material doesn’t make a great deal of sense (is there really any meaning, for instance, in repurposing Nora Orlandi’s themes from the giallo The Strange Vice of Mrs. Wardh in what is ostensibly the context of an homage to westerns?), and there’s also something slightly disingenuous about a multi-million dollar blockbuster that squanders massive amounts of money attempting to emulate films whose budgets wouldn’t even cover this film’s catering bill, but it’s doubtful that all these individual elements could have been mixed into a more potent cocktail than this. Both films are technically excellent, with Tarantino aided by an extremely talented cinematographer, the great Robert Richardson, and (in the first volume) the combined efforts of Yuen Woo-ping and the KNB EFX Group to provide a heady mixture of slick wirework and over-the-top grue.
The real star of both films, however, is Uma Thurman. The Bride is, at least until the final act of Volume 2, a paper-thin construction, more of an icon than an actual character (and, arguably, deliberately so), but Thurman’s gung-ho performance allows her to overcome the limitations of the role, establishing her as a genuine action heroine in the process. She manages to alternate between over the top and comparatively subtle, spitting out hokey dialogue as if she really believes in the words she’s saying, and as a result lends the films an air of credibility that they would have lacked had she approached the character with her tongue in her cheek. Both volumes are, of course, peppered with star turns and cameos (some extended, some brief) from numerous icons of world cinema, with Gordon Liu, Sonny Chiba and (extremely briefly) Samuel L. Jackson all butting heads. If there is a true stand-out, however, it’s David Carradine as Bill, giving a measured, nuanced performance and succeeding in making a cold-blooded killer seem like an amiable, whimsical eccentric – something which only succeeds in making his sudden bursts of violence and cruelty seem all the more shocking.
Taken as a whole, Kill Bill is a well-made and entertaining, if over-long and somewhat self-indulgent, ramble through the director’s favourite B-movies and songs. I suspect that its whole is actually slightly less than the sum of its parts – the strongest moments tend to be individual scenes and snatches of dialogue which don’t ultimately contribute a whole lot to the bigger picture – but it’s a fun romp overall, if ultimately a superficial one. For my money, Tarantino’s best work remains Pulp Fiction and Jackie Brown, the latter the closest he has ever come to making a “normal” film, but I find myself returning to Kill Bill more than these two put together. Perhaps I’m just a sucker for silly Caucasian girls who like to play with Samurai swords.
Blu-ray Presentation
Although released on separate discs, the transfers for both volumes of Kill Bill are essentially of the same standard – that is to say very good but still with some noticeable flaws. They are both presented in their original 2.39:1 aspect ratio (barring a brief segment in Volume 2 which is windowboxed to 1.33:1, as per the original theatrical presentation and the DVDs), and have received AVC encodes on dual-layer BD-50 discs. Kill Bill was treated to a digital intermediate, which caused Tarantino, who felt that the end result was overly clean, some misgivings. The cleanness to which he was referring is, I suspect, due to a grain reduction pass, the results of which are unfortunately readily apparent more or less consistently throughout the film. This takes the form of “sluggish” movement of the film grain and some smearing on textures and facial features during fast movement (the grainy monochromatic sequence in the wedding chapel at the start of Volume 2 is worst affected), in addition to some ghosting (particularly prevalent in the animated sequence in Volume 1 which charts the origin of O-Ren). Ultimately, the image looks rather digital and not at all like the films being referenced, with only the deliberately grainy Pai Mei training sequence exhibiting anything close to an unadulterated filmic look.
These quibbles aside, the transfers are of a very high standard. Detail is almost always very good, resulting in the films looking completely different from the very disappointing, overly processed standard definition DVDs. Compression is faultless across the board, and, barring the noise reduction, there is no other evidence of digital tampering, apart from what looks like some light edge enhancement in the snow garden at the end of Volume 1. Overall, both films look very pleasing to the eye, with the flaws that do exist more than likely being the fault of the production house contracted to produce the DI rather than the technicians responsible for the Blu-ray transfers.
For audio, both films feature uncompressed PCM 5.1 audio tracks (48 kHz, 24-bit), which sound absolutely stellar, conveying the mix’s broad soundstage and the impressive level of detail in the foley design. Dialogue is clear across the board, and the individual pops and crackles in the vinyl-sourced music tracks are crisply rendered (no doubt a little too crisply for some!). The rear channels are used effectively throughout, with the standout moment being the “buried alive” segment of Volume 2. These rank as among the best audio tracks available on Blu-ray at the moment, and truly show what a lossless audio presentation of a good mix can do to enrich the viewing experience.
English and French Dolby Digital 5.1 tracks (both 640 kbit/sec) are also provided, in addition to optional subtitles in a variety of languages (English, Spanish, Chinese, Korean and Japanese, with French subtitles also, inexplicably, being provided for Volume 1 but not Volume 2). Non-English dialogue is, as with the DVDs, player generated, but does a far better job of “blending in” with the rest of the film than on these previous releases. For the most part, they are accurately placed within the picture frame, although on a couple of occasions in Volume 1 the text does unfortunately stray out of the picture frame and into the letterboxing below (a pain for those with 2.39:1 displays).
One final word of caution: perhaps this goes without saying, but it should be noted that the versions of both films presented here are the R-rated US cuts rather than the Japanese versions. In the case of Volume 2, the Japanese version gains little more than a few seconds’ worth of establishing shots, but for Volume 1, the differences are considerably more significant. In addition to having the entire House of Blue Leaves fight scene in colour, the Japanese cut also gains a number of additional gore shots and a longer version of the O-Ren origin story, in addition to other more minor changes which are adequately catalogued elsewhere. Many viewers, myself included, prefer Volume 1 in its Japanese incarnation, and those who are likely to be bothered by these differences may wish to hold out for an unexpurgated copy at a later date.
Extras
The extras included are exactly the same ones which accompanied the American DVD releases of both films. In other words, they don’t amount to anything particularly worthwhile. Each volume receives a fairly superficial “making of” EPK (22 minutes for Volume 1 and 26 minutes for Volume 2), consisting of behind the scenes material, far too many clips from the films, and perfunctory clips of the cast and crew answering the usual inane questions that have been put to them.
In terms of the rest of the content, Volume 1 has a collection of trailers for various Tarantino films, among them the teaser and “bootleg” trailers for Volume 1 and the theatrical trailer for Volume 2. Volume 1 also includes 6 minutes’ worth of unused footage of Japanese band the 5, 6, 7, 8s performing at the House of Blue Leaves, while Volume 2 has Robert Rodriguez, who composed the small amount of original music heard in the film, performing live with his band at the film’s premiere party. The final curiosity, also accompanying Volume 2, is a brief (4-minute) deleted scene consisting of a flashback in which David Carradine engages in a fight with Michael Jai White. All of this is fairly insubstantial and simply leaves the viewer yearning for the special edition that Tarantino has hinted at on numerous occasions.
All of the extras are presented in standard definition.
Overall
Provided the lack of extras and the presence of the tamer R-rated cut of Volume 1 don’t deter you, both volumes of Kill Bill have been well-served on Blu-ray. In an ideal world, the Weinstein Company would have released the combined cut of both films, entitled “The Whole Bloody Affair” (which also includes the House of Blue Leaves fight scene in colour and the violence deleted from the R-rated version), in high definition by now. Given that they have yet to even release it on DVD, however, it looks like this is going to be the best we’ll get for some time, and really, we could do a hell of a lot worse.
Full resolution 1920x1080 screen captures of both films are available on my web site:
Volume 1
Volume 2


Comments
Member
Posts: 205
Great review, I really want to get my hands on these. Are the longer cuts available in Japan on BD?
Contributor
Posts: 1645
------
Reviews | DVDs | My Web Site
Home Cinema Enthusiast
Posts: 71
I think I'll be picking these up. Cant say that I'm that fussed in missing out on the Jap content from what you've said Michael. I enjoy these films immensely so I dont see another couple of minutes on the first film making much of a difference.
Good review by the way.
------
If you only knew the power of the Dark Side
Contributor
Posts: 194
Member
Posts: 187
The Japanese version is an alternate version, not an uncut version as frequently stated. It was filmed that way especially for that part of the world so the "definitive" version is down to either where you live in the world, or personal preference.
Member
Posts: 515
I consider it uncut. The US version is shorter because the fights were cut by the MPAA. The black and white is effective but the utilisation of it in bloody scenes was again a form of censorship
Member
Posts: 813
Personally I like both cuts. It works well in black and white, and colour. The Japanese DVD annoyingly English subd throughout all of the film.
I agree with Chris. The Western Cut isn't cut, just an alternate cut.
Member
Posts: 49
I will be picking up both of these and probably go for the UK versions as I have a Amazon voucher.
The first film was not cut by the MPAA. It was filmed like that for the West including the sequence in b&w. It is a homage to kung fu movies from the 70's and 80's that do the same thing. As it doesn't happen in Japan. The sequence was in colour.
Member
Posts: 31
I've been waiting since seeing these in theatres for The Whole Bloody Affair cut. I'm beginning to become very impatient though. I'll continue to wait.
Member
Posts: 61
I'm also waiting for the The Whole Bloody Affair to surface. If that day should ever come.
Member
Posts: 515
Originally Posted by nic:
I will be picking up both of these and probably go for the UK versions as I have a Amazon voucher.
The first film was not cut by the MPAA. It was filmed like that for the West including the sequence in b&w. It is a homage to kung fu movies from the 70's and 80's that do the same thing. As it doesn't happen in Japan. The sequence was in colour.
But the sequence is missing footage of violence. So is the earlier anime sequence
Member
Posts: 92
I much prefer the Japanese cut but these will do for me, having to turn on the English subs manually every time someone spoke Mandarin/Chinese/whatever was a pain in the arse. I don't care about the Whole Bloody Affair to be honest, it'll just be a mess as one movie without significant trimming.
It swims, it eats and it makes little sharks!
Posts: 92
".....disingenuous"
I really hate that word. That and "Disembling" If people mean either "fake" or "false" and "telling lies" then just say it!
We are not politicians here, so therefore...we do not have to cover our true meanings and intentions with 'nicer' sounding trade-offs.
I personally have never seen Taratino's suposed 'magic'. RESEVOIR DOGS was his best. If you've seen that, you've seen everything he's ever done. To me he has always been an annoying, 'stereotypical loadmouth' American who just cannot seem to get his head out of his own arse.
And as for his ability to write 'hip and cool dialogue' this skill obviously left him for this film because in places it is not just bad...it's plain awful!
That aside, good review.
------
You catch a shark, cut off its fins and tail, throw it back into the water ALIVE, but now unable to swim - so it slowly drowns - only to dry then boil those fins down to make a tasteless watery broth that costs the earth and is nothing more than a status symbol.
Ignorance personified.
Member
Posts: 813
The idea of watching Kill Bill 1 and 2 spliced together makes me shudder. It's already a severely overly long film, with stacks of what are really deleted scenes. Just like The Matrix sequels and Pirates 2 & 3.
Parts of Volume 2 are especially awful. Volume 1 is lots of fun though. Longer isn't always better!
I disagree that you only need to see Reservoir Dogs. Pulp Fiction and Jackie Brown are also very good. As good as Kill Bill Volume 1 and Death Proof are (both I enjoyed) it is a pity QT has given up on making proper films.
Member
Posts: 92
Jackie Brown seems to be the ugly stepchild of Tarantino's filmography, which is a shame as it's fantastic!
Member
Posts: 95
Can we all start using the word "alternative" instead of "alternate"?
/rant
Member
Posts: 813
No.
p.s - I thought that was Four Rooms.
Member
Posts: 187
Originally Posted by colderclimate:
Can we all start using the word "alternative" instead of "alternate"?
/rant
http://www.imdb.com/Sections/AlternateVersions/
Why?
Contributor
Posts: 1645
Originally posted by LightStorm
".....disingenuous"I really hate that word. That and "Disembling" If people mean either "fake" or "false" and "telling lies" then just say it!We are not politicians here, so therefore...we do not have to cover our true meanings and intentions with 'nicer' sounding trade-offs.
Well, I suppose I could restrict my reviews to using single-syllable words only, but I tend to find that they flow better when the language isn't systematically dumbed down.
I don't really think I'm making any attempt to "cover my true meanings": I would assume that most of the people reading this site have a fair idea of what "disingenuous" means. And I can be perfectly blunt when the need arises. After all, the last review I wrote for DVD Times contained the sentence "In a word, Spooks: Code 9 is shit." Doesn't get much clearer than that!
------
Reviews | DVDs | My Web Site
Contributor
Posts: 194
Originally posted by nic
I will be picking up both of these and probably go for the UK versions as I have a Amazon voucher. The first film was not cut by the MPAA. It was filmed like that for the West including the sequence in b&w. It is a homage to kung fu movies from the 70's and 80's that do the same thing. As it doesn't happen in Japan. The sequence was in colour.
Yes, technically the Western Edit is indeed "uncut" in that the MPAA did not ask for any cuts to be made, but the House of Blue Leaves sequence is undoubtedly edited down to make sure the film came in at R rather than NC-17.
I'm not sure I understand what you mean by "this is what they did in 70s and 80s Kung Fu films", you mean US martial arts films?
Member
Posts: 515
Some of the more violent Chang Cheh films went into black and white to avoid censorship. The Assassin (1967) does this on its theatrical prints but the remastered prints have the original colour. Later Chang used colored filters and toned down the bloodshed following a censor crackdown in Hong Kong
The practice was also applied to some US TV prints of kung fu films
Contributor
Posts: 194
Member
Posts: 95
I guess in my defence, I say "alternative" as that's the correct use of the word given the contest, and "alternate" is an Americanised bastardisation of a word that essentially means to switch back and forth.