Disc Specs
- Region:
- - Released:
Out now - Country:
United States of America - Running Time:
96 minutes - Screen Format:
1.78:1 / 1080P / VC1 - Discs / Type:
1 / HD15 - Soundtracks:
- English DD-Plus 5.1
- French DD-Plus 5.1 - Subtitles:
- English
- French
- Spanish - Special Features:
- Behind the Story:
-- The Interview
-- VFX Step by Step
-- Inside the Director's Mind
- Inside the Fountain: Death and Rebirth
- Peter Parks Bonus
- Theatrical Trailer - Distributor:
Warner
The Fountain
03-06-2007 14:00 | 6971 views | Michael Mackenzie | Show Backlinks | Other "The Fountain" Content
The Film
Darren Aronofsky's The Fountain is an astounding audio-visual experience. Beautiful to look at and listen to, it works purely on your senses and your emotions. It's not a film to think about too deeply - there isn't a great deal of plot and Aronofsky doesn't have anything particularly profound to say. [...] That seems beside the point however when a film is this sumptuous and moving.
- Kevin O'Reilly at DVD Times
There is a strange deadness in the film, together with a callow self-importance and self-pity which become more stultifying with every minute that passes, factors which are actually made worse by the obvious competence of everyone concerned: so much technical élan is being expended on this narcissistic and flimsy stuff.
- Peter Bradshaw in the Guardian
It's not often that I directly reference someone else's review of a film I'm covering - actually, I have something of a rule against even reading other criticism until I've put my own thoughts down on paper. Generally speaking, I'm wary of allowing other peoples' thoughts into my head before I'm even clear on my own, but, with The Fountain, I decided to make an exception. When the final credit rolled, just over an hour and a half after I'd sat down to watch Darren Aranofsky's "bold 1000-year odyssey" (to quote the marketing blurb), I found myself staring at the screen in flabbergasted silence, unable to believe what I'd just seen, and unable to express any coherent thought beyond the nagging feeling that I'd just lost 95 minutes of my life. So convinced was I that I must simply have been missing something that I immediately went online to peruse a few reviews, hoping that someone would have written something which might offer me some sort of insight into what it was all about. While I've never read a review that has caused me to do a complete U-turn on my opinions on a film, I've certainly come across the odd one or two that have helped me to better appreciate one that already impressed me. Unfortunately, none of the various rave reviews of The Fountain that I've come across have given me anything approaching an understanding of the material, while the critics who responded negatively seem to have been as baffled as me.
The film is nothing if not ambitious in its scope. Essentially purporting to tap into mankind's conception of mortality and the desire for eternal life, it takes place over the course of a millennium, focusing on iterations of the same two characters (played by Hugh Jackman and Rachel Weisz) from three different periods: the past, the present and the future. The material pertaining to the present is the best, perhaps partly because it is the least preposterous, but also because it is the only one that comes close to tapping into what I would consider genuine human emotions. In this section, a young doctor, Tommy Creo (Jackman), seeks desperately to cure his wife Izzy's (Weisz) brain tumour. The same cold indifference that permeates the rest of the film is present here too, but at least it's a situation that most of us could probably relate to. In contrast, the material taking place in the past - 16th century Spain - and the future - a strange, metaphysical reality involving a tree seemingly suspended in space - are too ludicrous and kitschy to be taken particularly seriously. The latter, especially, descends into a completely preposterous muddle, and I'm rather sorry to say that my reaction to what I'm sure was intended to be a highly emotional climax was to laugh.
One gets the sense that all of this means something to Aronofsky, who succeeded in creating a much stronger emotional connection, for me, with his earlier Requiem for a Dream, but none of that meaning makes the transition from his mind to the screen. It ultimately leaves the impression of being an intensely personal project that, for some unknown reason, was entertained by studio executives, to the point of actually being made and released. The film was booed at its Venice Film Festival premiere, and, with its own smug sense of self-importance and refusal to actually provide a meaning to any of the events it depicts, beyond an incredibly nebulous and (to use a word I normally do my best to avoid) pretentious claim to be exploring the nature of mortality, it's not hard to see why. It's certainly an attractive film, well-shot and well-acted, but at the same time it's incredibly distant, and, in this case, strong craftsmanship alone is not enough to carry it. It's simply not as profound as it would like to be.
HD DVD Presentation
Given its visually driven nature, The Fountain, arguably more than most films, demands the highest possible quality of technical presentation. Unfortunately, the results are decidedly underwhelming. Presented in an aspect ratio of 1.78:1 (like most of Warner's titles, it has been slightly reformatted from its theatrical 1.85:1), this 1080P VC1-encoded transfer looks to have been heavily filtered and noise reduced, and as a result is about as middle of the road as they come. A lot of the film takes place in low light, and this, combined with the noise reduction, wreaks absolute havoc with the grain structure, causing all manner of distracting smearing. I'm astounded that a title as recent as this is so mushy-looking, and, given that the master can't be any more than a year old, I can only conclude that the studios still have a lot to learn about mastering for high definition. Shadow detail is also poor, although whether this was inherent on the original photography is unclear.
The transfer on the standard definition side, meanwhile, is of course inferior to its high definition counterpart, although, on the standard definition scale would probably actually rank a little higher, given the lower inherent quality of DVD material.
The sound, meanwhile, presented in Dolby Digital-Plus 5.1 at 640 Kbps, is solid without being exceptional. It's clear and full-sounding, without anything particularly earth-shattering in the way of multi-channel placement: in all, it's simply a perfectly functional mix. A French dub, as well as English, French and Spanish subtitles, are also included.
Extras
For this combo release, the placement of the bonus materials is a little odd. All of the content is included on the HD DVD side, while the standard definition side contains only the six-part Inside the Fountain: Death and Rebirth documentary and the Peter Parks photography reel. DVD-only viewers aren't missing out on too much, though, as the documentary, which boasts a 50-minute running time, is by far the most substantial of the extras. Aronofsky talks at length about his inspirations and his own writing process, while the film's chequered production process (principle photography was originally due to begin in 2002, before Warner shelved the project). The main focus, however, seems to be on production design, which is somewhat appropriate given that, for the most part, the film tries to get by on its visual elegance alone.
Of the content exclusive to the HD DVD side (which, despite this, is presented in standard definition only), the most significant is the 12-minute The Interview, in which Rachel Weisz asks Hugh Jackman, in the process of having tattoos applied to his arms for an upcoming scene, a series of vaguely philosophical questions about the film. Their banter is enjoyable enough, but it's hard to shake off the impression that this is merely a back-patting exercise for the talents of Aronofsky (Weisz's husband). The VFX demonstration, meanwhile, is watchable enough, but unlikely to appeal to those not interested in the technical side of things, while the cryptically-titled Inside the Director's Mind actually turns out to be a 15-minute storyboard/previz to final film comparison. Finally, the Peter Parks Bonus is essentially a 5-minute screensaver loop showcasing some of the macro-photography shot for the film.
Overall
The Fountain gets a decidedly mediocre HD release that doesn't do its lush visuals justice by any stretch of the imagine. Still, even if it had been graced with the most impressive transfer ever, I would still find it rather difficult to recommend this infuriatingly nonsensical ramble even as demo material. If you like the film, you may find some of the additional bonus materials interesting, but if, like me, you thought it was a pompous load of odd cobblers, there's really nothing here worth bothering about.
Sponsored Review
This review is brought to you through our partners at DVD Pacific, an excellent retailer offering low prices, affordable shipping and five star customer service making them DVDTimes' favoured direct import route for R1 DVD..
To ensure continued reviews of the latest Region 1 titles please help support DVDTimes by purchasing your DVDs through the following graphic link...
See our full range of DVDPacific Sponsored Reviews
To ensure continued reviews of the latest Region 1 titles please help support DVDTimes by purchasing your DVDs through the following graphic link...
See our full range of DVDPacific Sponsored Reviews



Comments
Member
Posts: 205
Member
Posts: 185
Anyway, for people like me who were expecting a commentary track from Aronofsky on the disc, still got some hope. I just read an article today saying that Aronofsky is extremely disappointed by the treatment "The Fountain" has got on the dvd. He also says that everything at the studio was a struggle. Looks like he did wanted to do a commentary track for the disc but the studio bigwigs thought it wouldnt help sales, so he gave up!
The good news however is that he promises to record a downloadable track that can be played as a commentary track! Looks like he's also trying to convince people at Criterion! The article also says that anyone interested in backing Aronofsky in this regard can write a polite mail to Criterion. I would've loved to post that link but not sure if any external link is allowed here.
Member
Posts: 605
Looks like he's also trying to convince people at Criterion! The article also says that anyone interested in backing Aronofsky in this regard can write a polite mail to Criterion.
Member
Posts: 30
Contributor
Posts: 1647
------
Reviews | DVDs | My Web Site
Member
Posts: 81
Michael,
I wouldn't usually do this, but given what you said in your review about not having found anything that's given you an understanding of the material, I'm repeating verbatim here the comment I left on Eamonn McCusker's review of the R2 DVD. This is what I feel to be a very simple explanation of what's going on. I'd be interested in your comments after reading this:
My interpretation (which I'm thoroughly convinced of after seing this again last night) and makes complete sense within the context of the film, is that the 1500 segment is the story that takes place within the book, and both the present day and the 2500 stories are 'real' - Tommy the scientist and spaceman Tom are literally the same person in a continuation of the same story. It is neither obtuse or nonsense, it deals very poetically and succinctly with several themes, the most prevalent of which is humankind's universal search for immortality.
This is the basic version - the film embelishes upon all these points in far greater detail:
Tommy in the present day is a scientist who has just discovered a way to reverse aging using a compound derived from a particular central American tree. His wife Izzi is dying. She is obsessed with Mayan culture and specifically mentions two stories - a man who had a tree planted on his grave and so grew into the tree and became part of it, and the myth of the Mayan underworld Xibalba which was believed to be located in a nebula surrounding a dying star.
Tommy cannot cope with the fact his wife is dying, and to help him cope with her death, Izzi writes a novel about a 16th century conqistador searching for the Tree of Life, leaving the last chapter for Tommy to complete. When she dies Tommy feels unable to complete the book.
He plants a seed of the central American tree on his wife's grave so she will grow into the new tree and it will contain her essence. He then uses the tree's properties to keep himself alive for the next 500 years while he escorts the tree to the Xibalba nebula, the place where Izzi believed she could be reborn (this is sci-fi after all).
It takes him 500 years to complete the last chapter of Izzi's book, and it is only when he finally accepts he is going to die that he is able to do it. He completes the story of the conquistador, the point he takes over being after the Mayan priest stabs Tomas with the line "death is the road to awe". Spaceman Tom writes from the point where the priest offers himself for sacrifice to Tomas up until Tomas' death by bursting into flowers.
The film references many different cultures' ideas regarding immortality: namely, the Christian Tree Of Life and its idea of literal immortality by bringing long life; Buddhist enlightenment; the Mayan myths concerning death and rebirth which in turn touch upon ideas of reincarnation and death as a means of creation (Tomas bursting into flowers), and even Tommy being a scientist is a continuation down this same path - throughout their existence, humankind have sought immortality through religion, but now (especially in western culture) religion is waning and science has taken its place as far as responsibility for extending life goes. Science is the new religion by which we may yet attain immortality.
And at the centre of this a love story, with the basic notions of making the most of the time you have and appreciating the moment, because death comes to us all too soon.
It may help that I have a philosophy degree that I was so profoundly moved by this film, I don't know, it might just be that I'm naturally interested in discussion of the themes it deals with. It did take me around a week of thinking about it to work out precisely what I'd seen, but then on second viewing with it all already in mind, not one frame or line is out of place and the whole thing made complete sense. It's certainly not easy and I can understand why some people are turned off by it, but to my mind it's just an absolutely beautiful piece of work.
------
My DVD Collection
Account Disabled
Posts: 162
Couldn't agree more.
Member
Posts: 89
------
Member
Posts: 3
Yes, agree 100% with your take on the film. Personally I loved it, and found it quite easy to make sense of by the end.
The early story is her view, the later is his, as he finally accepts her death and "Finishes It". It is the present day story that is the only "Real" one.
I recently showed it to a group of about 20 people, about 60% of them absolutely loved it, 2 of them were just plain confused until I explained it to them, then they went away happy, the others just thought it was ok. There was no one there who actually disliked it.