Final Destination 3
10-02-2006 20:10 | 17431 views | Kevin O'Reilly | Show Backlinks | Other "Final Destination 3" Content
What a pleasant surprise this is! The third Final Destination movie is not only the best of the series by far but the most enjoyable guilty pleasure to come out of Hollywood for ages. If the first two films took themselves a bit too seriously considering how silly their basic premise is, this one acknowledges its daftness, lets its hair down and embraces the exploitation movie spirit with gusto. Yes, Final Destination 3 is an honest-to-god exploitation movie, not a sanitised studio imitation of one. It has an outrageous amount of blood and gore, it has gratuitous female nudity and, best of all, running just below the surface, it has a wicked sense of humour. The time it's a rollercoaster accident that sets the story in motion, plane crashes and highway pile-ups having already been done. Graduating high school senior Wendy (Mary Elizabeth Winstead) is enjoying a night at a fairground with her classmates when she has a premonition that the ride she's about to take will end in disaster. She panics and scrambles out of her seat, followed by eight other kids who have been spooked by her warning. The ride begins and - wouldn't you know it - the cars tumble off the track and the kids who didn't get out are killed. Wendy's boyfriend and her best pal are among the dead.
Afterwards, Wendy is wracked with guilt. She blames herself for not trying harder to stop the ride. Just when she needs cheering up, her dead pal's boyfriend Kevin (Ryan Merriman), who also escaped with his life, comes to her with a terrifying theory. He's discovered through internet research that six years before, a boy had a similar premonition about an air disaster. Seven people left a plane before it blew up on take-off and the survivors went on to die one by one in mysterious accidents. Legend has it that they were supposed to have perished and that Death came back to finish the job. Wendy tells him to go to hell, dismissing his story as nonsense. Then a couple of girls who got off the doomed rollercoaster die under bizarre circumstances.
Those bizarre circumstances are of course the main reason for seeing Final Destination 3. I'm not going to reveal the exact methods of execution, I'll just observe that the way Wong and Morgan turn mundane locations like a gymnasium, a beauty salon and a drive-through restaurant into death traps is ingeniously macabre. The deaths are bloody too! The gore level is extremely high for a 15-rated film, even by the BBFC's recent, more liberal standards: blood, brains and body parts are splattered all over the screen with gleeful abandon. The upcoming remake of The Omen will have to work hard to top this.As gruesome as it is, Final Destination 3 isn't nasty or sadistic like some of the slashers that have come out recently. It's more Nightmare On Elm Street 4 than Wolf Creek. You may cover your eyes at times but you can't take it seriously enough to be upset. The demises are too outrageous, the undercurrent of humour too strong. Listen to the songs that play over some of the scenes.
In terms of pace, Final Destination 3 is a big improvement over its predecessors. It hurtles from one spectacular death to the next, scarcely stopping for breath. This time, scenes aren't wasted on the characters trying to figure out what's happening to them. They already know - Kevin's googled it! There's some guff about stopping the deaths by using the laws of physics (or something!) but it doesn't seem to work very well. The characters also somewhat morbidly try and figure out what the Grim Reaper has in store for them. Wendy took some photographs at the fairground and it turns out that the manner of each character's death is cryptically foretold in the pictures she took of them. Kevin pores over his photo obsessively, wondering if the SpongeBob SquarePants toys in the background are a clue. "SpongeBob lives underwater", he muses. To which Wendy says, "Do you know how sad you are for knowing that?"
This is a very funny film. Writer-director James Wong and co-screenwriter Glen Morgan used to collaborate on the X-Files TV series back in the nineties and this movie exhibits the same kind of witty self-mockery as the more tongue-in-cheek episodes of that show - the ones in which Mulder and Scully investigated mutant cockroaches and homicidal circus freaks. The characters might not be laughing but you can almost hear Wong and Morgan cackling offscreen.



Comments
Banned
Posts: 222
Member
Posts: 285
Ah, man, I'm sold after the first paragraph.:D
Member
Posts: 97
Random person
Posts: 174
No.
We watch them because we love seeing goregous teens die in very funny situations. Looney Tunes Style.
Member
Posts: 95
Hey Stoned, I think it'll make some people think twice about getting a tan too! [That scene was the creepiest for me! I won't spoil it!]
Contributor
Posts: 1651
------
Reviews | DVDs | My Web Site
Member
Posts: 32
However James Wong's work on the original was fairly impressive and help lift it from being just a mundane slasher film with a gimmick, to somthing pretty fun. If he does as good a job here, and it is as gory as the review says, then this should be quite the treat.
Contributor & Filmmaker
Posts: 980
------
We do not tell time, time only tells us.
Member
Posts: 1817
Credit is due, though, for the imaginative, bloody death scenes (made me think of early-80s horrors like Happy Birthday To Me) and the total lack of fake, cat-jumping-out-of-cupboard "shock" moments. It's rubbish, but about 100 times better than Valentine or I Still Know What You Did Last Summer.
Member
Posts: 155
the opening roller coaster accident was certainly far less spectacular than the road accident too.
Member
Posts: 320
Member
Posts: 60
I found that 2 and 3 were very similar in tone. Hilarious, looney-tunes deaths separated by tedious angsty "character development." However, this film fails to match the earlier sequel in the two things that really matter:
-The prettiness of the actors
-The over-the-top-ness of the deaths
It does have far more gratuitous nudity, though. I'll grant that.
Taxi Driver nut!
Posts: 116
It was great fun, and a welcome break from the Academy-baiting films so prevalent within cinemas at this time (even though I am a self-confessed "Brokie") :D
------
All the animals come out at night... Someday a real rain will come and wash all this scum off the streets
Member
Posts: 32
The death scenes were very funny, but thats it, everything else about the film is so poor.
I was also disapointed to see that it was'nt as gory as I have been hearing. Extreamly high level for a 15 rated film? I can think of quite a few much gorier 15 rated horror films recently. House of wax for instance, that film delivered on the gore and, while not perfect by anymeans, at least cared a bit about its chracters. This was just a bad film on pretty much every level and the plot and the way it just plodded from one death scene to the next was an absolubte bore. There was no flow to the proceedings or anything and even when the film was gory it never made the most out of its scenes.
Contributor
Posts: 152
I knew it was going to a disappointment from the opening rollercoaster scene, which had little of the tension found in the plane crash or pile-up scenes from 1 and 2. It was sloppily-executed, and far-less experienced director David Ellis did a superior job with part 2 in every respect...
That's not to say it isn't a "good" horror film - I certianly enjoyed it! But it felt lazily put-together compared to the other movies. Wong and Morgan did an infinitely better job with the original, and they seemed to be on auto-pilot here; delivering what we've come to expect, but forgetting to embue it all with the same sense of invention.
The death scenes were great (gotta love the drive-thru segment), but I wish they'd brought in some more story elements. Am I the only one missing Tony Todd in this film? How cool would it have been if that mysterious morgue attendant came back, and actually offered some answers? Why do certain people get visions, etc? Some of the elements that could have been explored (if you're not next on Death's list, you're pretty much invincible), were dropped altogether. There needed to be more to keep it fresh...
Maybe I'm expecting too much, but I am a big fan of the series. I just hope part 4 introduces more to the mix. It's a good horror franchise - I just want it to be better...
------
Scruffy little nerf herder, and full-time film buff
@ the IMDb
Member
Posts: 3
IMHO it was a pretty good film, but really just a comedy where the punchlines were teenagers getting killed in outrageous ways. And there were some pretty good punchlines in there.
Paul
Contributor
Posts: 152
Him being "in" the film, and the producers using a soundbyte from previous instalments, is hardly the same thing! :D
Perhaps he'll return to the franchise in the future...
------
Scruffy little nerf herder, and full-time film buff
@ the IMDb
Member
Posts: 3
And apparently, he was all up for another go, but Morgan and Wong wanted to distance themselves from the first two a little bit, so decided against using his character.
Apart from his voice, which, lets face it, is his best feature by far.
Candyman, candyman, candyman, candyman.......Nah, I ain't got the balls:D
Contributor
Posts: 152
So what exactly did he do? Flew me right by...
I wanted his character to have a bigger role, more than anything.
------
Scruffy little nerf herder, and full-time film buff
@ the IMDb
Member
Posts: 3
Next time you see it, the voice will stand out like a sore thumb!
You are right, though. It would have been cool to have him show up again, although whether he actually cleared anything up in the last two is debatable. He was just creepy weird:eek:
FD3 was a pretty lean story, going pretty much from one teen death to the next with no detours or explanation. Just mutilated teens!
Member
Posts: 4
I'm glad Todd wasn't in it - I have to say I was never that keen on his appearances in 1 & 2 - far too hammy for my liking, and rather pointless.