Film Specs

  • Certificate:
    15
  • Running Time:
    93 minutes
  • Released:
    2006
  • Country:
    United States of America
  • Director:
    James Wong
  • Starring:
    Mary Elizabeth Winstead
    Ryan Merriman
    Kris Lemche
    Amanda Crew
    Sam Easton
  • Genre(s):
    Horror

Final Destination 3

10-02-2006 20:10 | 17431 views  |  Kevin O'Reilly  |  Show Backlinks  |  Other "Final Destination 3" Content

What a pleasant surprise this is! The third Final Destination movie is not only the best of the series by far but the most enjoyable guilty pleasure to come out of Hollywood for ages. If the first two films took themselves a bit too seriously considering how silly their basic premise is, this one acknowledges its daftness, lets its hair down and embraces the exploitation movie spirit with gusto. Yes, Final Destination 3 is an honest-to-god exploitation movie, not a sanitised studio imitation of one. It has an outrageous amount of blood and gore, it has gratuitous female nudity and, best of all, running just below the surface, it has a wicked sense of humour.

The time it's a rollercoaster accident that sets the story in motion, plane crashes and highway pile-ups having already been done. Graduating high school senior Wendy (Mary Elizabeth Winstead) is enjoying a night at a fairground with her classmates when she has a premonition that the ride she's about to take will end in disaster. She panics and scrambles out of her seat, followed by eight other kids who have been spooked by her warning. The ride begins and - wouldn't you know it - the cars tumble off the track and the kids who didn't get out are killed. Wendy's boyfriend and her best pal are among the dead.

Afterwards, Wendy is wracked with guilt. She blames herself for not trying harder to stop the ride. Just when she needs cheering up, her dead pal's boyfriend Kevin (Ryan Merriman), who also escaped with his life, comes to her with a terrifying theory. He's discovered through internet research that six years before, a boy had a similar premonition about an air disaster. Seven people left a plane before it blew up on take-off and the survivors went on to die one by one in mysterious accidents. Legend has it that they were supposed to have perished and that Death came back to finish the job. Wendy tells him to go to hell, dismissing his story as nonsense. Then a couple of girls who got off the doomed rollercoaster die under bizarre circumstances.

Those bizarre circumstances are of course the main reason for seeing Final Destination 3. I'm not going to reveal the exact methods of execution, I'll just observe that the way Wong and Morgan turn mundane locations like a gymnasium, a beauty salon and a drive-through restaurant into death traps is ingeniously macabre. The deaths are bloody too! The gore level is extremely high for a 15-rated film, even by the BBFC's recent, more liberal standards: blood, brains and body parts are splattered all over the screen with gleeful abandon. The upcoming remake of The Omen will have to work hard to top this.

As gruesome as it is, Final Destination 3 isn't nasty or sadistic like some of the slashers that have come out recently. It's more Nightmare On Elm Street 4 than Wolf Creek. You may cover your eyes at times but you can't take it seriously enough to be upset. The demises are too outrageous, the undercurrent of humour too strong. Listen to the songs that play over some of the scenes.

In terms of pace, Final Destination 3 is a big improvement over its predecessors. It hurtles from one spectacular death to the next, scarcely stopping for breath. This time, scenes aren't wasted on the characters trying to figure out what's happening to them. They already know - Kevin's googled it! There's some guff about stopping the deaths by using the laws of physics (or something!) but it doesn't seem to work very well. The characters also somewhat morbidly try and figure out what the Grim Reaper has in store for them. Wendy took some photographs at the fairground and it turns out that the manner of each character's death is cryptically foretold in the pictures she took of them. Kevin pores over his photo obsessively, wondering if the SpongeBob SquarePants toys in the background are a clue. "SpongeBob lives underwater", he muses. To which Wendy says, "Do you know how sad you are for knowing that?"

This is a very funny film. Writer-director James Wong and co-screenwriter Glen Morgan used to collaborate on the X-Files TV series back in the nineties and this movie exhibits the same kind of witty self-mockery as the more tongue-in-cheek episodes of that show - the ones in which Mulder and Scully investigated mutant cockroaches and homicidal circus freaks. The characters might not be laughing but you can almost hear Wong and Morgan cackling offscreen.

DVD Times Ratings

  • Overall: 
    7
    7 out of 10

Reader Ratings

  • Overall: 
    7.2

Comments

#1 Posted: 10-02-2006 21:43
brownpants
Banned
Posts: 222

Report this post
Cant WAIT to see this on Sunday. Yeah baby, yeah!!!!!
Quote this post
#2 Posted: 10-02-2006 22:45
napalm68
Member
Posts: 285

Report this post
"outrageous amount of blood and gore, it has gratuitous female nudity".

Ah, man, I'm sold after the first paragraph.:D
Quote this post
#3 Posted: 11-02-2006 09:04
Stoned
Member
Posts: 97

Report this post
Great film. Saw it last night and it was most ammusing, perfect if your one of those people who think twice before going on rollercoasters haha ;) :D
Quote this post
#4 Posted: 11-02-2006 09:25
Iain-Boulton
Random person
Posts: 174

Report this post
The review makes it clear, no one ever sees a Final Destination film just to get scared of death.

No.

We watch them because we love seeing goregous teens die in very funny situations. Looney Tunes Style.
Quote this post
#5 Posted: 11-02-2006 14:29
filmcritik
Member
Posts: 95

Report this post
Brilliant sequel, a real good one! I hope they do another, but it'll be harder to top this.

Hey Stoned, I think it'll make some people think twice about getting a tan too! [That scene was the creepiest for me! I won't spoil it!]
Quote this post
#6 Posted: 11-02-2006 16:00
Michael Mackenzie
Contributor
Posts: 1651

Report this post
Thanks for the review, Kevin. The fact that the writers and director of the original and comparatively straitlaced Final Destination were in charge of this installment makes it somewhat surprising that they chose to go for the all-out tongue in cheek B-movie feel, but then again that was what made the second film so enjoyable. I'm looking forward to this one.
------

Reviews | DVDs | My Web Site

Quote this post
#7 Posted: 11-02-2006 17:25
moxon
Member
Posts: 32

Report this post
I didn't like the second film as I thought it was poorly directed and the deaths neither made me jump or cheer, they were gory, yet strangley dull.

However James Wong's work on the original was fairly impressive and help lift it from being just a mundane slasher film with a gimmick, to somthing pretty fun. If he does as good a job here, and it is as gory as the review says, then this should be quite the treat.
Quote this post
#8 Posted: 11-02-2006 19:55
Richard Booth
Contributor & Filmmaker
Posts: 980

Report this post
I was really looking forward to seeing the original and I was bitterly disappointed to find out that it was a horrendously cheesy, poorly-acted, poorly-directed, poorly-conceived Z-grade horror "comedy". It was absolutely dire.
------
We do not tell time, time only tells us.
Quote this post
#9 Posted: 12-02-2006 00:10
Phil Q
Member
Posts: 1817

Report this post
I really can't stand the post-Scream teen horror movies, and this one didn't do much to change my mind. It's completely and utterly non-scary, the plot is exactly the same as the first film, the dialogue is crap (and unfunny - see SpongeBob quote above) and the 20-something "teens" are as irritating as always. Same-old same-old.

Credit is due, though, for the imaginative, bloody death scenes (made me think of early-80s horrors like Happy Birthday To Me) and the total lack of fake, cat-jumping-out-of-cupboard "shock" moments. It's rubbish, but about 100 times better than Valentine or I Still Know What You Did Last Summer.
Quote this post
#10 Posted: 12-02-2006 09:41
gareth young
Member
Posts: 155

Report this post
This film was good fun, but I thought the gore was rather toned down in comparison to part 2, cutting away very quickly.
the opening roller coaster accident was certainly far less spectacular than the road accident too.
Quote this post
#11 Posted: 12-02-2006 18:19
davids
Member
Posts: 320

Report this post
WOW! This film is great! The opening is amazing, among the best in cinema history - it's up there with Saving Private Ryan! And toned down gore?? It has one of the most gruesome deaths i've ever seen in a film and it was shown about 3 times in closeups lasting several seconds.
Quote this post
#12 Posted: 13-02-2006 16:07
bronso
Member
Posts: 60

Report this post
I can't help but feel that anyone who though FD2 took itself too seriously fundamentally misunderstood that film.

I found that 2 and 3 were very similar in tone. Hilarious, looney-tunes deaths separated by tedious angsty "character development." However, this film fails to match the earlier sequel in the two things that really matter:

-The prettiness of the actors
-The over-the-top-ness of the deaths

It does have far more gratuitous nudity, though. I'll grant that.
Quote this post
#13 Posted: 13-02-2006 19:34
michaelmyers
Taxi Driver nut!
Posts: 116

Report this post
I saw this today with some friends following a Business Studies catchup session at my school :o

It was great fun, and a welcome break from the Academy-baiting films so prevalent within cinemas at this time (even though I am a self-confessed "Brokie") :D
------
All the animals come out at night... Someday a real rain will come and wash all this scum off the streets
Quote this post
#14 Posted: 14-02-2006 11:06
moxon
Member
Posts: 32

Report this post
Saw this yesterday and was very diapointed after reading this review.

The death scenes were very funny, but thats it, everything else about the film is so poor.

I was also disapointed to see that it was'nt as gory as I have been hearing. Extreamly high level for a 15 rated film? I can think of quite a few much gorier 15 rated horror films recently. House of wax for instance, that film delivered on the gore and, while not perfect by anymeans, at least cared a bit about its chracters. This was just a bad film on pretty much every level and the plot and the way it just plodded from one death scene to the next was an absolubte bore. There was no flow to the proceedings or anything and even when the film was gory it never made the most out of its scenes.




Quote this post
#15 Posted: 15-02-2006 13:41
D.J. Nock
Contributor
Posts: 152

Report this post
Easily the weakest of the three, and this is coming from a major Final Destination fan.

I knew it was going to a disappointment from the opening rollercoaster scene, which had little of the tension found in the plane crash or pile-up scenes from 1 and 2. It was sloppily-executed, and far-less experienced director David Ellis did a superior job with part 2 in every respect...

That's not to say it isn't a "good" horror film - I certianly enjoyed it! But it felt lazily put-together compared to the other movies. Wong and Morgan did an infinitely better job with the original, and they seemed to be on auto-pilot here; delivering what we've come to expect, but forgetting to embue it all with the same sense of invention.

The death scenes were great (gotta love the drive-thru segment), but I wish they'd brought in some more story elements. Am I the only one missing Tony Todd in this film? How cool would it have been if that mysterious morgue attendant came back, and actually offered some answers? Why do certain people get visions, etc? Some of the elements that could have been explored (if you're not next on Death's list, you're pretty much invincible), were dropped altogether. There needed to be more to keep it fresh...

Maybe I'm expecting too much, but I am a big fan of the series. I just hope part 4 introduces more to the mix. It's a good horror franchise - I just want it to be better...
------
Scruffy little nerf herder, and full-time film buff

@ the IMDb
Quote this post
#16 Posted: 15-02-2006 20:14
ellispa
Member
Posts: 3

Report this post
Tony Todd is in the film. You just have to listen closely!

IMHO it was a pretty good film, but really just a comedy where the punchlines were teenagers getting killed in outrageous ways. And there were some pretty good punchlines in there.

Paul
Quote this post
#17 Posted: 16-02-2006 00:43
D.J. Nock
Contributor
Posts: 152

Report this post
Tony Todd is in the film. You just have to listen closely!

Him being "in" the film, and the producers using a soundbyte from previous instalments, is hardly the same thing! :D

Perhaps he'll return to the franchise in the future...
------
Scruffy little nerf herder, and full-time film buff

@ the IMDb
Quote this post
#18 Posted: 16-02-2006 10:15
ellispa
Member
Posts: 3

Report this post
That's no soundbyte, baby. It's all original post-production added Todd. He's got two roles, actually.

And apparently, he was all up for another go, but Morgan and Wong wanted to distance themselves from the first two a little bit, so decided against using his character.

Apart from his voice, which, lets face it, is his best feature by far.

Candyman, candyman, candyman, candyman.......Nah, I ain't got the balls:D
Quote this post
#19 Posted: 16-02-2006 12:35
D.J. Nock
Contributor
Posts: 152

Report this post
That's no soundbyte, baby. It's all original post-production added Todd. He's got two roles, actually.

So what exactly did he do? Flew me right by...

I wanted his character to have a bigger role, more than anything.
------
Scruffy little nerf herder, and full-time film buff

@ the IMDb
Quote this post
#20 Posted: 16-02-2006 13:23
ellispa
Member
Posts: 3

Report this post
I feel like I'm spoiling something, but he was the voice of the devil outside the rollercoaster, and also the announcer on the underground at the end.

Next time you see it, the voice will stand out like a sore thumb!

You are right, though. It would have been cool to have him show up again, although whether he actually cleared anything up in the last two is debatable. He was just creepy weird:eek:

FD3 was a pretty lean story, going pretty much from one teen death to the next with no detours or explanation. Just mutilated teens!
Quote this post
#21 Posted: 23-02-2006 18:10
strontian
Member
Posts: 4

Report this post
Saw this last night and I have to agree that it's the best of the three. Number 1 set up the clever idea but petered out towards the end. Number 2 was a real let-down and appallingly acted. But this one was entertaining from the start. The rollercoaster sequence was exhilarating and the deaths suitably inventive. I really liked the premise of the clues being in the photographs, which elevated the levels of tension before each death. And what a bleak ending - but all the better for it.

I'm glad Todd wasn't in it - I have to say I was never that keen on his appearances in 1 & 2 - far too hammy for my liking, and rather pointless.
Quote this post