Disc Specs

  • Region:
    1
  • Released:
    Out now
  • Country:
    United States of America
  • Running Time:
    96 minutes
  • Screen Format:
    1.78:1 Anamorphic NTSC
  • Discs / Sides / Layers:
    1 / 1 / Dual
  • Soundtracks:
    English Dolby Digital 5.1 EX
    English DTS-ES 6.1
  • Subtitles:
    English
    Spanish
  • Special Features:
    Audio Commentary
    Theatrical Trailer
    Into the Dark featurette
    Shedding a Light featurette
    Music Videos
    Storyboard to Screen
    Trivia Track
    Bullet Time Animatic
    Trailer Gallery
  • Distributor:
    Lions Gate

Film Specs

  • Certificate:
    R
  • Released:
    2005
  • Country:
    Canada
    Germany
    United States of America
  • Director:
    Uwe Boll
  • Starring:
    Christian Slater
    Tara Reid
    Stephen Dorff
    Frank C. Turner
    Mathew Walker
    Will Sanderson
    Mark Acheson
  • Genre(s):
    Action
    Film
    Horror
    Live Action

Alone in the Dark

16-07-2005 00:00 | 8916 views  |  Michael Mackenzie  |  Show Backlinks  |  Other "Alone in the Dark" Content

Words alone cannot describe the experience of abject horror that is watching Dr. Uwe Boll's latest offering to the world of cinematic trash. Alone in the Dark is a shambling wreck of a movie, a chunk of cinema so bad that what is actually wrong with it defies explanation. No single element can be held up as the reason for its monumental failure: the budget is reasonable, a number of the cast members are quite accomplished... even the source material, the 1992 Infogrames computer game, is one of the richest and most sought-after franchises in the world of gaming. And yet, somehow, Alone in the Dark ranks as one of the worst films I have ever had the misfortune of sitting through. It took 13 years for the game to make the transition to the big screen, and if Dr. Boll (who previously helmed the similarly dreadful video game to film adaptation House of the Dead) was the best filmmaker Infogrames could find to helm the project, then I think it's safe to say that they should have waited another 13 years.

The amazing thing about this film is that its sheer awfulness does not sink in immediately. The film is as boring as watching paint dry throughout, yes, but if you want sheer laugh-out-loud unintentionally funny moments, you will have to be patient. The film has plenty of these, no doubt - ranging from the hilarious exposition that various characters spout every time they open their mouths, to the choppily edited action sequences that are genuinely completely incomprehensible, to Tara Reid as an archeological student (for chrissakes!) - but the overwhelming emotion that I felt as I watched this film was one of abject boredom rather than mirth. Boll certainly does a wonderful job of making an awful movie excruciating to watch: unlike what some people have suggested, this is not a case of a film that can be enjoyed for its badness, but rather one that is so bad that you want to blow a hole in your television screen and destroy every existing copy of the DVD.


The film opens with the longest and most mind-numbingly tedious crawl of text ever struck to celluloid. At first, I assumed that this was an attempt to add a Star Wars-esque level of grandeur to what was to follow - but no, Dr. Boll informs us on the audio commentary, this text was inserted because the test audience didn't have a clue as to what the film was supposed to be about. The sad thing is that, even with the exposition front-loaded in text form, we're still none the wiser. Something to do with a container being found under the sea which, when opened, causes certain people around the world to turn into zombies and develop a taste for human blood. That's what it looks like to me, at any rate. There are some strange, alligator-like monsters as well. I think maybe they came out of the box. Into the mix comes Edward Carnby (Christian Slater), a globe-trotting academic (think Indiana Jones stripped of all his coolness) and "paranormal investigator" who grew up in an orphanage, and... well... I'm not really sure, but it seems that the other orphans, now adults, were among the people who turned into zombies. But that doesn't matter, because we've got Carnby on the case! He'll sort things out, with a little help from the brains of the operation, his girlfriend Aline Cedrac (Tara Reid, in a perfect example of this film's "genius" casting), as well as his bitter rival, Commander Burke (Stephen Dorff). Sound like fun? It's not.


Dr. Boll is clearly a fan of The Matrix and its horrible sequels, as evidenced by his penchant for dressing characters in leather trenchcoats, having them spout inane pseudo-psychobabble and getting into all sorts of overly-long and ultimately pointless fights, usually with a hefty dose of Bullet Time and other poor and distracting CGI. These fight scenes, which are so badly choreographed and edited that at times it is virtually impossible to follow what is happening, are actually something of a blessing in disguise because, awful as they are, they are at least more interesting than the rest of the scenes, which are filled with some of the worst dialogue and acting known to man. ("Doctor, I've started decoding the pictograms!" breathes the sublimely dim Tara Reid, while poor old Christian Slater can only look lost and hope that the next action sequence isn't too far off.) This is one movie that certainly cannot be accused of conforming to a generic plot structure, but only because it doesn't actually have a plot or a structure. Things just sort of... happen... and they happen in an infuriatingly slow manner, punctuated occasionally by sudden bursts of gunfire, before the film reaches its baffling conclusion.

Don't laugh, but I think the world needs more filmmakers like Uwe Boll. Not for the quality of the films themselves, as Alone in the Dark is so bad it fails to even classify as being "so bad it's good", but because of his own sense of self-importance and complete inability to see just how truly awful his work is. In a day and age when even the worst Hollywood schlock is competently made, it makes something of a change to see a movie that is completely terrible in all aspects of its production, and it is nice to be reminded that, yes, films this bad do exist. Not that I recommend you inflict this monstrosity on yourself or your loved ones, mind.



Christian Slater wears this bemused
expression throughout most of the film.

DVD Presentation

In an incredibly cruel twist of fate, Lions Gate have serviced this diabolical film with an exemplary transfer and audio mix. Presenting the film anamorphically in an aspect ratio of 1.78:1 (close enough to the theatrical ratio of 1.85:1 for it to not be worth splitting hairs about), Alone in the Dark looks sharp and detailed, so you can see each bad CGI monster, clumsy fight scene and badly-framed shot in all its glory. Some slight edge enhancement and a minor amount of artefacting during the darker scenes prevent it from achieving full marks, but overall this is a great transfer.

Audio, too, serves us well, with separate Dolby Digital 5.1 EX and DTS-ES 6.1 mixes offered up for our "enjoyment". Both tracks, especially the DTS variant, are extremely loud and have a great deal in the way of split-channel effects and the ridiculous bass levels action movie audiences crave. The dialogue scenes fare very well too, and try as I might, I can't fault the audio in any way.

English and Spanish subtitles are provided for the film, but for none of the extras.



One of the rare times the camera stops moving
for long enough to let us get a decent look at the CGI
alligator demons that show up from time to time.

Extras

Lions Gate have served up quite the exotic platter of bonus materials to accompany this sewage. First up, we get to hear Dr. Boll talk about the film and himself in a feature-length Audio Commentary. Any hope that Boll might be self-deprecating or aware of his shortcomings as a filmmaker are rapidly quashed when he announces, within the first few minutes, that the film has "various levels of story" and is inspired by the writing of H.P. Lovecraft. To be fair to the good doctor, he keeps talking throughout the whole film and provides information about the genesis of the adaptation and some anecdotes about the production, but when he started talking about how the film was a commentary on man's battle to control nature, I just wanted to switch off. Oh, and in case you were wondering, Boll explains that the reason people reacted so harshly towards the film was because he went with a "more poetic David Lynch ending" rather than what the traditional horror climax the "dumb audience" wanted. Good to know.

Into the Dark is a traditional EPK-style featurette in which various members of the team, including everyone's favourite director with a doctorate in literature, one of the various writers, the producer, and Christian Slater, gush about how wonderful the film is and how rich the source material is. Pass the sick-bowl already.

Shedding a Light, meanwhile, gives us 10 minutes of technical talk, explaining the various special effects techniques used in the film, including CGI, prosthetics and green-screens. A Storyboard to Screen comparison follows, providing examples from two different action sequences, which looked bad enough on paper and are even worse when filmed. A Trivia Track, meanwhile, provides all the information you could ever wish to know about Alone in the Dark, in pop-up form as the film plays. Of course, this means watching the whole thing again, which I really wouldn't advise.

And just in case you doubted Boll's love of The Matrix, a 1:30 Bullet Time Animatic is included, showing the opening fight scene in a rough 3D-rendered form. The expressionless CGI dummies that slide around the screen admittedly give slightly better performances than the actors in the final cut, but even so there isn't that much of interest here.

The original Theatrical Trailer, Music Videos for six songs from the film's soundtrack (including the hilariously awful "Wish I Had An Angel", by Nightwish, which runs over the closing credits - believe me, if you think the song itself is bad, wait till you see the video) and a Trailer Gallery (featuring House of the Dead, Riding the Bullet and The Final Cut) are also included.


Overall

Lions Gate sent me Alone in the Dark for free, and even then I felt cheated, so imagine how someone who actually paid for this DVD would feel after having to sit through this hour and a half of bile. In case you haven't worked it out yet, I have a recommendation: avoid. Like the plague.

DVD Times Ratings

  • Film:
    1
    1 out of 10
  • Video: 
    9
    9 out of 10
  • Audio: 
    10
    10 out of 10
  • Extras: 
    6
    6 out of 10
  • Overall: 
    2
    2 out of 10

Reader Ratings

  • Film 
    0
  • Video 
    0
  • Audio 
    0
  • Extras 
    0
  • Overall 
    0

Comments

#1 Posted: 16-07-2005 07:06
nwatts
Where it Falls
Posts: 155

Report this post
Funny review Michael. :D

Mind you, i'm still interested in seeing it. Every single person has slammed it, which means it has to be worth seeing - if only for its badness!
------
YMDb
Quote this post
#2 Posted: 16-07-2005 12:42
ty7du
Wanker of the 1st Degree
Posts: 210

Report this post
I cross my fingers for Silent Hill. Thank god Uwe Boll didn't get his hands on that one.

I wonder if Doom will be any good...
Quote this post
#3 Posted: 16-07-2005 12:57
Iain-Boulton
Random person
Posts: 174

Report this post
Great Review! :D

As I could remember with Alone In The Dark - it was set in a country mansion and set in the past. Not in the present day with a giant machine gun and Tara Reid as some sort of smart person - that's not right at all.

I cannot believe companies still let this man grab a hold of a camera. He's completed BloodRayne (Doomed), he's about to start something called Dugeon Siege (Doomed and proabley destory the career of Jason Staham along with it) and I never want to touch House of the dead with a ten inch pole.

CAN SOMEONE SHOOT UWE BOLL NOW PLEASE!?:D
Quote this post
#4 Posted: 16-07-2005 23:00
ElectricSheep
Member
Posts: 53

Report this post
Oh, great review. I've saved this page.

Thanks for the warning. I had been hoping this was a so-bad-it's-good flick, but it was not meant to be. At least we were treated to your review, in compensation. :)
It's a shame the really bad=good movies are growing so thin on the ground. A lost art? Well, it just means I must go back and savour the ones I have.
------
http://www.akha.org - Thailand's abusing Akha human rights and US funded missions are kidnapping Akha children. http://www.akha.org/article335.html - missionary crusade against Akha people (Note, site only handles moderate traffic).
Quote this post
#5 Posted: 17-07-2005 12:05
Phil Q
Member
Posts: 1815

Report this post
Quote:
In a day and age when even the worst Hollywood schlock is competently made, it makes something of a change to see a movie that is completely terrible in all aspects of its production, and it is nice to be reminded that, yes, films this bad do exist.

Which is precisely why I still feel I have to watch this (although thanks for the highly entertaining warnings Mike!).

It's the very fact that things like the Matrix sequels are competently made that makes me dislike them so much. There's always that depressing feeling that they could have been so much better.

I'd rather watch something genuinely awful - like, say, House of the Dead or a Steven Seagal movie - which couldn't even be "rescued" by the combined efforts of Martin Scorsese, Yuen Wo Ping, Red Adair, the Pope and the Justice League Of America.
Quote this post
#6 Posted: 17-07-2005 15:52
Kevin O'Reilly
Contributor
Posts: 299

Report this post
First of all, thank you Michael. Now if this gets a belated cinema release like House of the Dead did, I can just link to your review and I won't feel obliged to cover it myself.

Someone explained on the DVD Forums how Boll gets his financing - because of a German tax break system - so that solves one mystery. I suppose the video games producers don't know much about Hollywood and don't expect much anyway, based on how Resident Evil, Street Fighter and Tomb Raider turned out. Still to be explained is how Boll gets the actors he does. Jason Statham, if not quite A list, is a star with a respectable CV while Leelee Sobieski is a real talent. And Ben Kingsley - for shame!
Quote this post
#7 Posted: 18-07-2005 12:28
cjb110
Member
Posts: 59

Report this post
heh good review! Though tbh I thought it was just way-below average for the fist half, I could even accept Tara Reid being 'clever'...but then it went *bluergh* and turned into the worse mess I have ever seen (and I own Battlefield Earth:D)

It's not 'good because its so bad', it's just unbearable to watch or then try to explain.
Quote this post
#8 Posted: 18-07-2005 14:47
Oswald Cobblepot
Member
Posts: 36

Report this post
Quote: 'It's the very fact that things like the Matrix sequels are competently made that makes me dislike them so much'

That and the fact that they wasted the combined GDP of a few small countries (and more of my life than I was prepared to give up) to make 2 hugely pretentious loads of old cobblers.

Quote: 'Someone explained on the DVD Forums how Boll gets his financing - because of a German tax break system - so that solves one mystery'

I'm sure the German nation would be gratified to know that their taxes are being used to contribute to the appalling CV of Mr Boll.
Quote this post
#9 Posted: 18-07-2005 16:48
Michael Mackenzie
Contributor
Posts: 1647

Report this post
Quote:
I'm sure the German nation would be gratified to know that their taxes are being used to contribute to the appalling CV of Mr Boll.

Dr. Boll, Oswald. Yes, this guy actually has a doctorate... in English literature, no less. :eek:
------

Reviews | DVDs | My Web Site

Quote this post
#10 Posted: 19-07-2005 05:09
Oswald Cobblepot
Member
Posts: 36

Report this post
My apologies Michael, and to you Dr Boll.

Wonder what his doctorate thesis was on - 'My Pet Goat' probably.
Quote this post
#11 Posted: 19-07-2005 09:31
tokyomonkey
Member
Posts: 269

Report this post
Jeez,the guy is a Game-to-film machine!-Another six on the way..how will he maintain the quality I wonder? ;)
Quote this post
#12 Posted: 11-10-2005 09:49
mad_zombie_killer
Member
Posts: 3

Report this post
-WARNING-
Uwe has completed his 3rd game to movie. The title: BLOODRAYNE starring Kristanna Loken (T3 sexbot), Michael Madsen (for the beer), Matt Davis (last film Into the Sun Steven Seagal. Enough said), Michelle Rodriguez (think she would have learnt her lesson with Resident Evil), Ben Kingsley (for the beer), Udo Kier (at least he's consistent. Consistently crap), Meat Loaf and Billy Zane.

Will this be his hat-trick (I think so).:eek:
Quote this post

Do you have a Times Network ID or DVD Times account? Sign in now!



Username:
Password:
Remember:


If not, why not register for one now and experience all the benefits of being a Times Network Member.