Disc Specs

  • Region:
    1
  • Released:
    Out now
  • Country:
    Canada
  • Running Time:
    84 minutes
  • Screen Format:
    1.66:1 Anamorphic NTSC
  • Discs / Sides / Layers:
    2 / 1 / Dual
  • Soundtracks:
    English Dolby Digital 5.1
    French Dolby Digital 5.1
    Spanish Dolby Digital 5.1
  • Subtitles:
    English
  • Special Features:
    Disc One:
    Audio Commentary
    Disney's Art Project
    "Follow Your Heart" Game
    "Colors of the Wind" Sing Along Song
    "Just Around the Riverbend" Sing Along Song
    "Colors of the Wind" Music Video
    Tarzan II Sneak Peek

    Disc Two:
    The Making of Pocahontas
    Early Presentation Reel
    Storyboard-to-Film Comparison
    Production Progression
    Design Galleries
    The Music of Pocahontas
    "If I Never Knew You" Music Video
    The Making of "If I Never Knew You"
    Deleted Scenes
    Theatrical Trailers
    The Premiere in Central Park
    Multi-Language Reel
    Publicity Gallery
  • Distributor:
    Buena Vista

Film Specs

  • Certificate:
    G
  • Released:
    1995
  • Country:
    United States of America
  • Director:
    Mike Gabriel
    Eric Goldberg
  • Starring:
    Irene Bedard
    Judy Kuhn
    Mel Gibson
    David Ogden Stiers
    John Kassir
    Russell Means
    Christian Bale
    Linda Hunt
    Danny Mann
    Billy Connolly
    Joe Baker
    Frank Welker
    Michelle St. John
    James Apaumut Fall
    Gordon Tootoosis
    Jim Cummings

    Supervising Animators:
    Glen Keane
    John Pomeroy
    Duncan Marjoribanks
    Nik Ranieri
    Ruben A. Aquino
    Ken Duncan
    Chris Buck
    T. Daniel Hofstedt
    Dave Pruiksma
    Anthony DeRosa
    Michael Cedeno
  • Genre(s):
    Animated
    Family
    Film
    Historical Drama
    Musical

Pocahontas: 10th Anniversary Edition

12-05-2005 12:00 | 21527 views  |  Michael Mackenzie  |  Show Backlinks

Pocahontas was put into production at the same time as The Lion King, and throughout most of its development was considered to be Disney's "A" picture, with much of the studio's key talent opting to work on it rather than was was seen as a doomed attempt to blend Bambi with Hamlet. Fate, it would seem, however, is not without a sense of irony, for The Lion King went on to break box office records and met with critical acclaim while the reaction to Pocahontas was decidedly muted, destined to be forever remembered as Jeffrey Katzenberg's misguided Oscar-grabber.

Ever since Beauty and the Beast was nominated for Best Picture in 1991 (the first time an animated feature was bestowed this honour, and probably the last too, since the Best Animated Feature category seems to have put paid to any prospect of animation being able to compete on equal ground with live action), many feel that Katzenberg, then head of Walt Disney Feature Animation and now of DreakWorks, has continued to play the Academy Award-chasing game with the animated features under his command. A common trait imbues all these productions, from his work at Disney to the pompous Prince of Egypt to the dull Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron: an ever-increasing attempt to mimic live action, coming so close to copying reality that the line between the two mediums is blurred. Walt Disney's philosophy was to caricature life and create an illusion of reality (a quality shared by all his best films); he was never afraid to embrace make-believe. Katzenberg, however, seems only to have been interested in "playing with the big boys" and Pocahontas, which is the closest of all the Disney animated features to the DreamWorks house style, is an unfortunate casualty of his quest for the golden statue.

(Please note that I harbour no ill feelings towards Mr. Katzenberg. For all his failings, he at least has more vision than his successors, the incompetent Tom Schumacher and the moronic David Stainton. The day Disney management appoints an actual artist to run their animation department instead of a money man or failed theatre producer will be a happy day indeed... and, incidentally, will probably coincide with Hell freezing over.)


The source material is pretty rich if you think about it: an actual historical figure and one about whom very little material has been written. Disney, as usual, takes several liberties with regard to plot, and the changes made have been thoroughly documented elsewhere so I won't bore you with them here. (It should be noted, though, that for all the studio's attempts to curry favour with Native Americans, the modification of a story that they apparently hold extremely dear cannot have gone down particularly well.) In this version, the villainous Governor Ratcliffe arrives in the New World with his trusty crew, whose numbers include the idealistic Captain John Smith. While Ratcliffe and his men are busy plotting how to "kill Indians" and discover the gold that is supposedly buried beneath the earth, Smith begins a secret relationship with Pocahontas, one of the natives and daughter of the chief of her tribe. Naturally, the course of true love never did run smoothly, and Pocahontas and Smith soon find themselves trapped in the middle of a bitter conflict between two different cultures.

The criminal mistake made here is the overall blandness of the film and its characters. Apart from the aforementioned attempts to mimic live action, which gives the characters a bland, stilted quality, it is clear that all those involved were treading extremely carefully in an attempt to avoid upsetting anyone's sensibilities. The genocide of the Native American people is something that Americans generally prefer not to talk about, so Disney should be commended for having the guts to confront this story head-on. However, this attempt to be politically correct has the result of reducing the natives to fossils who can do no wrong while presenting the invading Brits as brainless villains bent on destruction. Subtlety was never Disney's strong point, but here the various messages of "respect the earth", "follow your destiny" and "treat everyone equally" are so preachy as to be insulting. It certainly does not help that the imagery is utterly ham-fisted, a perfect example being a scene in which Pocahontas' decision to follow a more dangerous but more honest path in her life is represented by her choosing a dark, twisting fork in a river over a bright, straight one.


The po-faced nature extends to the visual design, specifically that of the characters who, for the most part, are painfully close to real life. I tend to be of the opinion that, if you want to use animation, you should have a reason for picking that particular medium over live action. It is for that reason that I find animated sitcoms like King of the Hill, which could so easily have been filmed in live action (and looked considerably less ugly as a result), absolutely deplorable, as they push an overly conservative form of animation that takes absolutely no advantage of the unique abilities for caricature and exaggerated action offered by the medium. Here, Glen Keane's animation of Pocahontas is masterful but painfully clinical. I still think that Keane was miscast as the lead on a fundamentally realistic woman, since he has always seemed to thrive the most with more grotesque characters, from the Beast in Beauty and the Beast to John Silver in Treasure Planet. In this respect, one of his female-oriented colleagues like Ken Duncan or Mark Henn would have been more appropriate. John Smith was animated by John Pomeroy, one of the infamous group that defected with Don Bluth and Gary Goldman in 1979, who was rehired by Disney specifically for the purpose of animating this character. Aping realism is one of the biggest problems with Bluth's later films, so it would seem that Pomeroy was well-cast for this role. The animation of Smith has a rather painstaking quality to it, often looking as if it as rotoscoped (the process of tracing over live action video reference), despite the fact that, as far as I can gather, it was all animated by hand.

It is ironic, therefore, that in many other respects the film is a visual wonder. Specifically, Rasoul Azadani's layouts show a spectacular sense of scale, and the colour scheme, courtesy of art director Mike Giaimo, demonstrates a level of maturity not usually seen in Disney's work. A highly stylized musical sequence towards the climax is also a veritable feast for the eyes, and suggests how good the film could have looked had Disney chosen to go for a less realistic approach throughout. The famous Colors of the Wind scene, too, is quite beautiful in its execution, and in many ways is the only truly imaginative sequence in the entire movie. Additionally, many of the secondary characters have a cartoonish quality that separates them from Pocahontas, Smith and the natives. In particular, Pocahontas' two animal companions, Flit the hummingbird and Meeko the raccoon, feel as if they belong in a different movie, evoking the cuteness factor of more traditional Disney efforts like The Little Mermaid. Had this approach been used for the film as a whole, I feel that it would have been substantially better overall, but given the serious context of the rest of the piece, the cartoony characters seem extremely misplaced.

Pocahontas represented a turning-point for the Disney studio: a move away from the innocence of the early 90s and an attempt to do battle with live action. While it would be unfair to point to a single factor as being responsible for the tragic death of traditional feature animation, it should certainly be pointed out that, sandwiched between the massively popular behemoth The Lion King and Toy Story (the first feature-length CG film), Pocahontas was probably doomed from the start. Nevertheless, its box office takings, while not on the same level as these two films, were certainly respectable, and ultimately the movie is simply not very good. This is not merely a case of being too ambitious - The Lion King, after all, was just as grand in scope, if not more so - but rather the situation of a flawed concept being pushed through production despite its problems.


DVD Presentation

The problem with Disney's transfers is that they're so damn unreliable. For every great presentation, they have at least one not-so-good one. Luckily, Pocahontas falls into the former category, with a rather nice digital 1.66:1 anamorphic transfer that thoroughly trumps the old grainy, blown-out, mosquito noise-ridden release that came out under the Gold Collection back when Disney was first getting into the DVD business. The colour reproduction is excellent, presenting Mike Giaimo's excellent art direction in all its glory. Likewise, there are no obvious compression artefacts, and the digital banding that plagues so many digital animation transfers does not seem to be present here. The level of detail is very good too, for the most part, although there are a few slight lapses into softness. There is some edge enhancement, which is visible on some of the higher contrast edges, but it is nothing like as bad as in Disney's worst efforts (e.g. Brother Bear, Kill Bill Volume 1). Overall, a most satisfying presentation.

The primary audio option is an English Dolby Digital 5.1 track. This is an extremely forward-focused mix, with little in the way of surround activity, but the clarity is excellent and there are no problems with drop-outs or distortion of any kind. French and Spanish 5.1 dubs are also provided, as well as English subtitles for the film itself, but sadly not for any of the extras.


Extras

The initial R1 DVD release of Pocahontas was on a single disc and featured little in the way of bonus materials - two music videos, a trailer, a trivia game and a "DVD storybook". The European releases, however, fared better, porting over a number of features from the deluxe LaserDisc release, including the 30-minute The Making of Pocahontas featurette, a storyboard to film comparison, deleted scenes, and a handful of other featurettes focusing on character design and music. In comparison with the previous R1 release, therefore, this new 2-disc edition is a massive improvement. When you compare it to the R2 editions, however, it looks somewhat less impressive. The first disc even uses substantially the same menus as the previous release.

It should be noted that two versions of the film are featured: the original (which must be accessed from the Setup menu), and a new version that integrates a musical number cut from the film when it was originally released. It takes the form of a love song between Pocahontas and Smith following Smith's capture by the natives, and it was cut for good reason: it's clumsy, badly-placed and bogs then narrative down. However, I won't begrudge Disney the right to include this wholly pointless addition, given that the original can still be viewed in a much more seamless manner than that of The Lion King (which featured a noticeable pause when skipping over the added scene when watching the "original" version). The integration is pretty good, but in a number of shots it is fairly clear that the footage was not created at the same time as the original material: the line style is slightly different, and the characters tend to look slightly less angular. This deleted song was actually presented on the LaserDisc and original R2 release in a combination of completed footage and rough animation, and in fact even aired on ABC in 1997, integrated into the film in this state. The promise of "Never-Before-Seen Animation" on the front cover of this release, therefore, is not strictly speaking true.

Disc 1

Disc 1 features a number of extras produced specially for this release. Of particular note is a brand new Audio Commentary. Featuring producer James Pentecost and directors Mike Gabriel and Eric Goldberg, this is a reasonable track, although it suffers from some lapses, due mainly to what seems to be apathy on the part of the speakers. Even the usually jolly Goldberg sounds a bit fed up at times, and sometimes the trio seem to be struggling to come up with anything to say. At times I got the impression that they were making a real effort to restrain themselves from launching into a full-on attack on the management responsible for bungling much of the film, since a lot of discussions regarding changes made to the film from its initial inception run along the lines of "the executives hated it". The track does, however, feature an amusingly snide comment from Goldberg when, after it is stated that the film was released in 1995, interjects, "Yeah, and we were released in 1996."

The rest of the extras on this disc, however, are comprised mainly of music videos the usual mind-numbing kids' games that Disney loves to indulge in. Good luck getting any satisfaction out of Disney's Art Project and the "Follow Your Heart" game - I was certainly at a loss. Also included are two Sing Along Songs (essentially playing the relevant scenes from the movie with on-screen lyrics - the quality is pretty awful too), a music video for Vanessa Williams' rendition of "Colors of the Wind", and a "sneak peek" for the horrible-looking direct-to-video cheapquel Tarzan II. Certain readers have expressed dissatisfaction about my constant berating of these cheap, nasty knock-offs, so I won't go into any more detail about that particular travesty.


Disc 2

Like the special editions of The Lion King and Mulan, the extras on the second disc are quite bitty in nature, but there are a number of interesting materials here to peruse. This disc is split into six sections: The Making of Pocahontas, Production, Design, Music, Deleted Scenes and The Release.

The Making of Pocahontas is a pretty good half-hour overview of the film's production. Narrated by Irene Bedard, the speaking voice of Pocahontas, it was produced at the same time as the film itself and thus serves as a rather interesting historical document. In comparison with the commentary, recorded a good eight years after the fact, the various crew members interviewed here are bright-eyed and enthusiastic about what they clearly believe to be a truly special film. The footage accompanying Bedard's narration, filmed in some sort of Native American nature reserve, has a rather cheesy quality to it, but the interviews with the various artists are well worth watching.

The Production section begins with an Early Presentation Reel, which features various pieces of concept art set to an early version of the "Colors of the Wind" song. The Storyboard-to-Film Comparison from the previous R2 release also shows up, along with a Production Progression showing various stages of the making of the film: storyboard, rough animation, clean-up animation, and final colour. The scene in question is sadly quite brief, but being able to view the footage in these various stages is definitely interesting.

Design includes a number of galleries featuring various conceptual designs of different characters, as well as examples of layouts and background paintings. A number of the sections are also accompanied by interviews with the supervising animators for the character in question, and/or pencil test footage. The most insightful by far is a 4-minute piece featuring Glen Keane explaining to an audience the differences between Pocahontas and a more traditional Disney princess like Ariel in The Little Mermaid. Also included is a gallery for the deleted character Redfeather, a large rooster who was to have been voiced by the late John Candy. Had the character remained in the film, it would have been his last role in a movie.

Music features a 7-minute featurette entitled The Music of Pocahontas, which explains the process of writing the various songs that appear in the film, and the collaboration between composer Alan Menken and lyricist Stephen Schwartz. Also included is a thoroughly cheesy music video for "If I Never Knew You", and just in case you couldn't get anough of it, a making-of featurette for the video.

Eight Deleted Scenes are also included, as well as a reel of miscellaneous scenes. These range from storyboard sketches to rough animation to completed footage, and many of them show glimpses of a more light-hearted approach to the storyline.

Finally, The Release showcases two original Theatrical Trailers, one of which features "Colors of the Wind" in its entirety, as well as footage of the Premiere in Central Park (featuring an interview with former mayor Rudolph Giuliani), a Multi-Language Reel for "Colors of the Wind", and a Publicity Gallery showing various poster designs and other marketing images.


Overall

I have met very few people who actually like Pocahontas; however, it is an interesting failure, and Disney fans will definitely want to pick this 2-set up so they can see just what happens when the studio attempts to accomplish the very antithesis of what Walt Disney stood for.

Please help support DVD Times by purchasing this title or any others through our affiliate links...

DVD Times Ratings

  • Film:
    4
    4 out of 10
  • Video: 
    9
    9 out of 10
  • Audio: 
    8
    8 out of 10
  • Extras: 
    6
    6 out of 10
  • Overall: 
    6
    6 out of 10

Reader Ratings

  • Film 
    5.5
  • Video 
    0
  • Audio 
    0
  • Extras 
    0
  • Overall 
    9

Comments

#1 Posted: 12-05-2005 11:35
Dodd
Member
Posts: 472

Report this post
Some interesting points, but I disagree with your conclusions on the subject of ‘realistic’ animation. It’s an unusual subject, but sometimes when a non-fantastical story is animated in a way which resembles live-action, it works on a different level. The obvious example is Grave of the Fireflies which would not be the same film were it live action, despite the fact that there is little in it which could not be achieved in the live action format - in this case, I suspect that the animated form reinforces the innocence of the protagonists, but also somehow prevents the material from being either too mawkish or too miserable. With King of the Hill, on a practical level, the effort goes into the scripts and allows the cast to play multiple characters but the decision to work in an animated form works artistically too, the idea of animating everyday blandness could be compared to – say - Raymond Carver writing elegantly about subjects which may appear mundane. Similar to Chris Ware’s heartbreaking graphic novel Jimmy Corrigan or the American Splendor strips, neither of which would have the same effect as prose.
Celebrating the limitless possibilities of animation is great, and it’s a crying shame that in recent times, Disney has done little to match the sheer joy of something like Dumbo, but there is room in the medium for the realistic and I think you’re right about Pocahontas in that it should have picked one version – traditional Disney or full-on realism – and stuck with it. The mix jars. I would have liked to have seen it entirely realistic and without songs or sidekicks. It might not have been a kid’s film, let alone a ‘Disney’ film, but I think animating this story seriously could have resulted in something remarkable.
A final point regarding Bluth (then I’ll shut up, promise) and his attempts at realism. I find they often backfire because his characters appear to be suffering from some form of epilepsy in an attempt to keep them visually interesting and mobile. He should have a look at some Japanese animation where they are not afraid to animate a little stillness, if that makes any sense.
Quote this post
#2 Posted: 12-05-2005 13:52
nwatts
Where it Falls
Posts: 155

Report this post
All film, independent of whether or not it's animation or live-action, is an illusion of reality. Having said that, I don't understand how animation can ever too closely mirror real life. You critisise Pocahontas because it too closely mimics live-action, which I can't seem to fathom. It's an animated film.

Don't get me wrong, the film is terrible. One of Disney's worst efforts. But to critisise it on the grounds that it's trying too hard to become true to life is somewhat ill founded.
------
YMDb
Quote this post
#3 Posted: 12-05-2005 14:12
David Mackenzie
ISF Certified
Posts: 356

Report this post
"Likewise, there are no obvious compression artefacts"

There's actually some very obvious ones on the close up of Pocahontas running through the forest at the very end. But I agree, the image quality is very good.
------
www.lyris-lite.net
Quote this post
#4 Posted: 12-05-2005 14:32
Michael Mackenzie
Contributor
Posts: 1647

Report this post
Quote:
All film, independent of whether or not it's animation or live-action, is an illusion of reality. Having said that, I don't understand how animation can ever too closely mirror real life. You critisise Pocahontas because it too closely mimics live-action, which I can't seem to fathom. It's an animated film.

Don't get me wrong, the film is terrible. One of Disney's worst efforts. But to critisise it on the grounds that it's trying too hard to become true to life is somewhat ill founded.

My criticism of its aping real life stems from the fact that I have never seen any point in trying to imitate real life in a medium that should allow you to do exactly the opposite. The closer to life it is, the less justification I can see for a film being animated rather than shot in live action. Also, when animation attempts to closely mimic real life, it tends to take on a stilted, overly conservative quality, as is certainly the case here. The character design of John Smith, for example, is ugly, boring to look at and at times grotesque in its aping of a real person. The rules for what look good in animation differ from those that look good in live action, and an attempt to shoehorn the rules of the latter into the former rarely has good results.
------

Reviews | DVDs | My Web Site

Quote this post
#5 Posted: 12-05-2005 18:10
dingbats
Member
Posts: 100

Report this post
I've never had a problem with Pocahontas and have always enjoyed it, so this new edition is a welcome replacement for the old single disc edition which had an appalling transfer in both R1 and R2 versions.
Quote this post
#6 Posted: 13-05-2005 16:27
Scaramanga
Member
Posts: 126

Report this post
Gotta agree with dingbats. (both on the feature and the dvd)
Quote this post
#7 Posted: 15-05-2005 11:45
nwatts
Where it Falls
Posts: 155

Report this post
Ah, I can see where you're coming from now. :)

I'm just a big fan of Miyazaki's animated work, which often closely mimics realistic human movement. However his entire style is quite different from that of most Disney films. It's interesting though, that his characters and the way they move don't seem stilted at all. However, as you mentioned, using the example of the John Smith character, they certainly do in this film.

The Incredibles is a good example of what you've mentioned though. The film works because Bird has drawn his human characters from caricatures, rather than real-life figures.
------
YMDb
Quote this post
#8 Posted: 15-05-2005 12:32
Michael Mackenzie
Contributor
Posts: 1647

Report this post
Miyazaki seems to understand the qualities that make an animated character seem real rather than attempting to slavishly copy them. The characters in his films are all exaggerated quite a bit - for example, Chihiro with her large head and bird-like limbs - but they move and act in a very believable way without ever seeming forced. That, to me, is the kind of "illusion of life" Walt Disney was going for, rather than that of Pocahontas, which seems only like an exercise in realism. The Incredibles has a lot in common with Miyazaki's work (indeed, I'm told the Pixar guys often refer to his films for inspiration, and John Lasseter is a good friend of Miyazaki): the designs are more exaggerated, but the intention behind them is the same.
------

Reviews | DVDs | My Web Site

Quote this post
#9 Posted: 21-05-2005 13:18
Wonderlicious
The person that you love to hate...
Posts: 24

Report this post
Hey, I was just wondering why you gave the extras 6/10. Personally, I thought they were great (even if the making of documentary was a mite fluffy), especially with the galleries that never seemed to end. In my opinion, worth an 8 or 9 out of 10. :)
------
-Joe
Quote this post
#10 Posted: 21-05-2005 13:48
Michael Mackenzie
Contributor
Posts: 1647

Report this post
Quote:
Hey, I was just wondering why you gave the extras 6/10. Personally, I thought they were great (even if the making of documentary was a mite fluffy), especially with the galleries that never seemed to end. In my opinion, worth an 8 or 9 out of 10.

In my opinion, the only extras of any real meat were the galleries, the deleted scenes and the Glen Keane design presentation. The commentary was pretty dry, and a lot of the other extras felt like little more than fluff. Don't get me wrong, there's some decent stuff here, but I think a 6/10 (which, in my book, is the equivalent of "good") is fair.
------

Reviews | DVDs | My Web Site

Quote this post