Disc Specs

  • Region:
    1
  • Released:
    Out now
  • Country:
    Canada
  • Running Time:
    133 minutes
  • Screen Format:
    2.39:1 Anamorphic NTSC
  • Discs / Sides / Layers:
    2 / 1 / Dual
  • Soundtracks:
    English Dolby Digital 5.1
    English DTS 5.1
  • Subtitles:
    English
    French
    Spanish
    Portuguese
    English (Fact Track)
    Extras subtitled in Spanish and Portuguese
  • Special Features:
    Fact Track
    10 Year Retrospective
    Jean Reno: The Road to Léon
    Natalie Portman: Starting Young
    Bonus Previews
  • Distributor:
    Columbia Tristar

Film Specs

  • Certificate:
    Unrated
  • Released:
    1994
  • Country:
    France
  • Director:
    Luc Besson
  • Starring:
    Jean Reno
    Natalie Portman
    Gary Oldman
    Danny Aiello
    Peter Appel
    Michael Badalucco
    Frank Senger
  • Genre(s):
    Action
    Crime
    Live Action
    Thriller

Léon: The Professional (Deluxe Edition)

07-02-2005 12:00 | 13272 views  |  Michael Mackenzie  |  Show Backlinks

Warning: this review contains major spoilers.

Luc Besson's Léon, or, as it is known in the US, The Professional, is the perfect example of how to concoct a solid action thriller. A French production that is curious for its Americanness, this tour de fource of acting, writing and directing showcases several supremely talented individuals at the height of their game, and features one of the most powerful platonic love stories in popular cinema.

12-year-old Matilda (Natalie Portman) lives in a run-down New York appartment with her brutish father, uncaring mother and older sister, and her younger brother, the only person in the world that prevents her from completely losing it. One day, she returns home from shopping to find that her entire family has been executed by corrupt cop Stansfield (Gary Oldman) and his team of thugs. With nowhere else to go, she shows up on the doorstep of Leon (Jean Reno), her neighbour who happens also to be a "cleaner": in other words, a hitman. Leon is reluctant to help her - in his world, she would be a liability - but he slowly begins to warm to her and takes her under his wing, teaching her the tricks of the hitman's trade. However, he soon finds himself facing two problems: first of all, Matilda wants to exact revenge against Stansfield for the murder of her brother; secondly, she is developing something of an infatuation with Leon.


Few films have succeeded in juggling action and plot as successfully as this. While on one hand it is a gripping thriller with expertly-choreographed stunts and blistering gunplay - beautifully shot by Thierry Arbogast and set to Eric Serra's pounding score - these elements can only carry a movie so far, and to compliment the action, Léon also provides some of the most moving characterisations that the genre has ever seen. At its heart is the complex bond between Leon and Matilda, a relationship that has both confused and outraged viewers for years since its release. The film was originally released in a truncated format with much of the character development removed due to poor test screenings, and when the longer "intergrale" edition was released some years later, audiences who had already expressed concern about the shorter cut's violence were unsurprisingly even more miffed when they saw the significantly more detailed treatment of the relationship between Leon and Matilda in the full-length cut. The bond between these two characters is a complex one, and their relationship cannot possibly be explained in conventional terms. The fact that one character is a 12-year-old while the other is a grown man lies at the heart of the issue, and those whose definition of "love" is limited to the notion of two people fucking are understandably going to be disturbed and incensed by what, when viewed from such a narrowminded perspective, looks like a perverted relationship that could almost be accused of actively encouraging paedophilia.

Often, Matilda behaves like an adult trapped inside a child's body, and likewise Leon, despite his decidedly adult profession, exhibits many childlike traits. The roles are not finite, however, and throughout the film they trade positions. When Leon attempts to console the recently-bereaved Matilda by using an oven glove as a puppet, or when he chastises her for smoking, he is definitely portrayed in the manner of a parent looking out for his child, yet on other occasions, such as when she teaches him to read or insists that he share a bed with her, their functions are clearly reversed. It is this notion of a child living in the world of adults and acting in a manner beyond her years that disturbs so many people, and it strikes me as being entirely indicative of the fact that the vast majority of people cannot and will not accept the fact that children grow up faster than adults would like them to. The issue has further been clouded by the fact that Besson's girlfriend at the time, Maïwenn Le Besco (who is interviewed on this DVD and recently appeared in the excellent Haute Tension), fell in love with the director at a young age and has claimed that Matilda's story is very similar to her own. By and large, though, it seems to me that the furore surrounding this matter has been blown out of all proportion and has generally stemmed from erroneous readings of the film by closed-minded individuals. Matilda is always the instigator - indeed, Leon consistently responds to her advances with a mixture of confusion and horror, and a very potent point is raised in the retrospective feature on the second disc: that intergenerational relationships are almost always characterised from the point of view of the adult, generally portrayed as a salacious pervert, completely ignoring the fact that young girls do indeed develop fixations on older men.


While Matilda is perhaps confused about her emotions, Leon eventually does come to love her, although not in the way that she wants him to. By the end of the film, he clearly loves her in the way that a father loves a daughter, whereas the way in which Matilda sees him is more complex: in her mind, she has constructed multiple roles for him to occupy, including both parent and potential lover. It is for that reason that their relationship is doomed to failure, and the film can only end with the death of one of them. That one must be Leon, for killing Matilda would make for a deeply depressing end. In any event Leon's character arc is complete by the films end: coming to know Matilda has changed him, there is essentially nothing more for him to do. His demise leaves the door open for Matilda's future - a future she arguably would not have had access to had she remained with Leon. Leon represents a fantastic study of such a relationship, and it is to Besson's credit that he avoids preaching to the audience, neither condoning nor condemning it.

The role reversal apparent in the Leon/Matilda relationship extends to the contrast between Leon and Stansfield. In a conventional film, Stansfield, a man of the law, would be the good guy and Leon, a hitman, would be the villain. In Leon, however, Stansfield is portrayed as a man without morals who, having shot dead a four year old, is only concerned about the blood on his suit, while Leon has rules that he rigidly abides by - most crucially, "no women, no children". Mike Bracken pointed out in his excellent review that one can even see this disparity in the clothes they wear: Leon with his ill-fitting but neatly-pressed medley of different sections, Stansfield with his up-market but persistently-crumpled suit. We're talking shades of grey here, and those expecting a clear-cut distinction between good and evil will undoubtedly be disappointed.


Of course, none of this would work were it not for the stunning performances by the three leads, not least of them young Natalie Portman, in her first and arguably best role. Generally, child actors portraying kids who act older than their physical age either come across as cutesy, or pretentious, or both, but Portman has the role down to pat, giving a harrowing performance that never consciously seems like acting. As a person, Portman herself may have something of a reputation for being a precociously opinionated snob, but none of this carries over to the screen. (Before anyone knocks me, I have nothing against precociously opinionated people - the world would certainly be a lot less interesting without them. However, Portman's ignorant comments about, among other things, the horror genre, do not sit well with me.) Jean Reno, who essentially reprises the character of Victor from his previous collaboration with Besson, Nikita, is also extremely impressive, imbuing the character of Leon with a multitude of subtle quirks and creating an incredibly multifaceted character that, in the hands of a lesser actor, could easily have been reduced to a buffoon. His portrayal makes it abundantly clear that Leon, although uneducated, is far from stupid: a remarkably complex individual, he is astute and skilled in his own area of expertise. Stealing every scene in which he appears, however, is Gary Oldman who, like Reno, masterfully handles a character that could so easily have been a complete joke. Oldman's Stansfield is a quintessential movie madman, completely out of control and lacking any sort of empathy. His performance is alternately horrifying and hilarious, and on no occasion moreso than when he blows away members of Matilda's family while humming Beethoven.

Léon is that rare example of an action movie done absolutely right. It doesn't talk down to its audience, it doesn't wallow in mindless exploitation and, most importantly, is completely driven by the characters. A phenomenal achievement for the genre, those who haven't seen this film have missed out on something very special.


DVD Presentation

Presented anamorphically in its original 2.39:1 aspect ratio, Léon does not look particularly good at all. The film's previous DVD presentations have all been sub-par, and the transfer used here appears to be exactly the same one that showed up both on the original US release of the integrale cut and the subsequent Superbit release. (The Superbit logo is even on the back of this release's cover.) The image consistently lacks detail and suffers from severe ringing and an excessive amount of noise reduction, and bafflingly, approximately 30 minutes, in the middle of the film, have been encoded interlaced (I believe that this falls within the remit of the material that was cut from the initial release of the film). This transfer is so poor that at times it looks worse than LaserDisc, and I have an extremely hard time believing the "Mastered in High Definition" tag on the cover to be accurate.

Separate Dolby Digital and DTS mixes are provided in 5.1 surround, and both are very good indeed, the film sounding significantly better than it looks. The dynamic range is impressive, and there are no apparent problems with synchronisation or distortion. Furthermore, the bass is extremely powerful in the various action set-pieces, creating a thoroughly satisfying auditory experience. I would perhaps give a slight edge to the DTS track for improved clarity, but overall there is very little difference between the two. Subtitles are provided in English, as well as French, Spanish and Portuguese; unfortunately, they are a rather ugly yellow and fall squarely in the middle of the line separating the image area from the letterboxing.


Extras

Presented on a 2-disc set, the vast majority of the bonus materials are contained on the second DVD, the first containing only the film and a Fact Track, which presents various pieces of trivia in the form of subtitles as the film plays. The information ranges from mildly interesting to downright irrelevant, but luckily there is a fair amount of it.

The second disc contains three featurettes, interviewing various members of the cast and crew a decade on from when the film was originally made. Luc Besson, who has made his disdain for bonus features known on a number of occasions, is unsurprisingly absent here. The first featurette takes the form of a 10 Year Retrospective, interviewing producer Patrice Ledoux, Besson's then-girlfriend Maïwenn, casting director Todd Thaler, director of photography Thierry Arbogast, costume designer Magali Guidasci, editor Sylvie Landra and actors Jean Reno, Natalie Portman, Frank Senger, Michael Badalucco and Ellen Greene over the course of 25 minutes. While interesting, it is simply too brief to go into sufficient detail and all too often seems to merely be skimming the surface.

The remaining two featurettes focus specifically on Jean Reno and Natalie Portman, charting their careers, with a particular focus on their roles in Léon, and featuring extensive interviews with the two actors in question. Both run for around 12 minutes and are fairly interesting but, as with the retrospective, don't go into enough detail to do their subjects justice. Also included are a collection of previews for various other Columbia Tristar releases but, annoyingly, no trailers for Léon.


Overall

All things considered, the "Deluxe Edition" tag that has been slapped on this package hardly seems appropriate. With an unnacceptably poor video presentation and decidedly limited bonus materials, I can think of absolutely no reason for viewers who already own one of the earlier releases of the full-length version of this film to upgrade. Léon is a fabulous piece of work that, when all said and done, deserves better than this.

Please help support DVD Times by purchasing this title or any others through our affiliate links...

DVD Times Ratings

  • Film:
    10
    10 out of 10
  • Video: 
    4
    4 out of 10
  • Audio: 
    8
    8 out of 10
  • Extras: 
    4
    4 out of 10
  • Overall: 
    6
    6 out of 10

Reader Ratings

  • Film 
    9
  • Video 
    0
  • Audio 
    0
  • Extras 
    0
  • Overall 
    7.7

Comments

#1 Posted: 07-02-2005 12:15
djnock
Member
Posts: 203

Report this post
Jeez...

"Deluxe Edition"? Who are they kidding?

It's a shame to hear about the poor transfer Michael - the film certainly deserves something better. Unfortunately, I've only seen the film on VHS or on TV, so is the barebones R2 disc alright, or is that bad in the video department too?

Who knows, we might get a new edition sometime soon...

D.J.
------
DVD Times Contributor
Quote this post
#2 Posted: 07-02-2005 12:22
Michael Mackenzie
Contributor
Posts: 1647

Report this post
Quote:
Unfortunately, I've only seen the film on VHS or on TV, so is the barebones R2 disc alright, or is that bad in the video department too?

From what I've heard, they're all pretty much the same. However, Rewind says that only the shorter cut is available in the UK, so you'd be better off looking elsewhere. Frankly, I doubt we'll see a good quality version of this film until it surfaces on BluRay.
------

Reviews | DVDs | My Web Site

Quote this post
#3 Posted: 07-02-2005 12:22
HumanMedia
Member
Posts: 11

Report this post
Comparing this to the V2 of the initial R1 Special Edition, it has poorer video quality and bad sound. Dont get me wrong, the DTS is nice but the mix is better on the original with more spatiality and surrounds at the correct levels.
Quote this post
#4 Posted: 07-02-2005 12:26
bradavon
Banned
Posts: 2907

Report this post
I saw this again when my DE arrived and it reminded at what a flawless film it is. I can't fault it in anyway. The directing and acting are both superb.

Matilda, Leon and Stansfield are all wonderfully written and rounded.

It amazes me the MPAA cut the film as the Director's Cut like Blade Runner is the only version worth seeing.

As for the DVD OMG I'm surprised you gave the video 4 out of 10. I'd give it 7 or 8. Even if it's not perfect 4 seems harsh IMO. The extras while limited are well produced and OMG x2 Luc Besson's ex-girlfriend is a stunner!

I used to own the Integral version and IMO the AV is the same here. The UK R2 is only the shorter cut so is to be avoided.

There is a Korean DVD which is said to use a master from Luc Besson as apposed to CT, that's not to say it's any better though.
Quote this post
#5 Posted: 07-02-2005 12:32
Michael Mackenzie
Contributor
Posts: 1647

Report this post
Quote:
It amazes me the MPAA cut the film as the Director's Cut like Blade Runner is the only version worth seeing.

I don't believe the MPAA ever cut the film. As far as I can tell the decision to remove 20 minutes was made by the studio and/or Luc Besson as a result of its poor reception at test screenings.

Quote:
As for the DVD OMG I'm surprised you gave the video 4 out of 10. I'd give it 7 or 8. Even if it's not perfect 4 seems harsh IMO.

Hey, I'm harsh, I admit it! I've always been extremely hard on transfers because of the huge discrepancy between what is possible to accomplish and what many studios usually come up with. The transfer on this DVD is far from the worst I've seen, but in comparison with what Columbia Tristar have done on other releases, often of films far older than this, there's just no excuse. To be honest I thought I was actually being quite generous in giving it a 4, given how bad the 30 minutes of interlaced material (coupled with excessive edge enhancement) look.
------

Reviews | DVDs | My Web Site

Quote this post
#6 Posted: 07-02-2005 12:36
AKPiggott
Member
Posts: 92

Report this post
I got the Japanese Intergrale version, which looks fine to me. Out of interest, can anyone provide a side-by-side comparrison of the two?
Quote this post
#7 Posted: 07-02-2005 16:17
temsonic
Member
Posts: 81

Report this post
I own the Korean R3 2-disc edition which AFAIK is the only edition to include both the cuts (on separate discs). I didn't notice any problems with the transfers on that version, and while it only has the DD5.1 sound mixes, they were perfectly acceptable with good weighty bass and plenty of spatialization in the gunfights etc. The extras are quite limited and don't include the new interviews done for this R1 Deluxe Edition, but if the picture quality on the new R1 is as bad as this review says it is, maybe you'll want to consider the R3 instead.

It can be obtained from DVD Asian (http://www.dvdasian.com/cgi-bin/dvdasian/15411.html) and HK Flix (http://www.hkflix.com/xq/asp/filmID.528357/qx/details.htm). Having bought from both suppliers in the past, I'd recommend DVD Asian over HK Flix.
------
My DVD Collection
Quote this post
#8 Posted: 07-02-2005 17:40
bradavon
Banned
Posts: 2907

Report this post
I didn't notice any problems with the transfers on that version, and while it only has the DD5.1 sound mixes, they were perfectly acceptable with good weighty bass and plenty of spatialization in the gunfights etc.

I'd say exactly the same about this and the Integral R1 DVD!

p.s - Fair enough Mike on the cuts. I wonder if the test screenings were purely American?
Quote this post
#9 Posted: 07-02-2005 17:46
nwatts
Where it Falls
Posts: 155

Report this post
Michael: You say you're hard on transfers... But I don't understand how your marking scheme works. You gave nothing but praise to the audio, but then gave it an 8/10 score? What's the deal with that?
------
YMDb
Quote this post
#10 Posted: 07-02-2005 17:52
Michael Mackenzie
Contributor
Posts: 1647

Report this post
Quote:
Michael: You say you're hard on transfers... But I don't understand how your marking scheme works. You gave nothing but praise to the audio, but then gave it an 8/10 score? What's the deal with that?

I gave the audio an 8/10 because it doesn't exactly distinguish itself in a significant way. It has few if any major flaws, but there are mixes out there that are much better in terms of depth, multichannel effects, etc.
------

Reviews | DVDs | My Web Site

Quote this post
#11 Posted: 07-02-2005 18:14
ulfingvar
Member
Posts: 6

Report this post
You must have been viewing a defect copy, since, at thedigitalbits.com they rave about the transfer (with some minor quibbles) and call it the best there is, at least for now. And the folks at The digital bits have yet to fail to impress me with their accuracy.

Maybe you saw a canadian disc? It is my experience that canadian discs are worse than US discs, even though they are all R1, the same way a swedish disc can differ (in quality as well as content) from a british one, a japanese one and a french one, and all of the above differ from each other, although they are all region 2.

So..something is definitely going on here.:confused:
------
Ulf Claesson
Quote this post
#12 Posted: 07-02-2005 18:24
ulfingvar
Member
Posts: 6

Report this post
In any event, I hope we can come to some sort of solution, as I don't want to buy discs which get differing opinions as to their quality.
------
Ulf Claesson
Quote this post
#13 Posted: 07-02-2005 18:35
Michael Mackenzie
Contributor
Posts: 1647

Report this post
Quote:
You must have been viewing a defect copy, since, at thedigitalbits.com they rave about the transfer (with some minor quibbles) and call it the best there is, at least for now. And the folks at The digital bits have yet to fail to impress me with their accuracy.

Maybe you saw a canadian disc? It is my experience that canadian discs are worse than US discs, even though they are all R1, the same way a swedish disc can differ (in quality as well as content) from a british one, a japanese one and a french one, and all of the above differ from each other, although they are all region 2.

So..something is definitely going on here.

The Digital Bits rave about a lot of transfers that are subpar. We are, after all, talking about the site that claimed that The Fellowship of the Rings' transfer was "HD-like".

Oh, and Columbia Tristar release the exact same discs both in Canada and the US.
------

Reviews | DVDs | My Web Site

Quote this post
#14 Posted: 07-02-2005 21:09
David Mackenzie
ISF Certified
Posts: 356

Report this post
Agreed on the transfer - it really is pretty nasty. Not sure if I'd go as low as 4, but certainly no higher than 5, if you've seen what DVD is capable of. There should be no excuse for this sort of thing. Part of it is interlaced, for crying out loud...

Quote:
You must have been viewing a defect copy, since, at thedigitalbits.com they rave about the transfer (with some minor quibbles) and call it the best there is, at least for now.

If they're watching the same version I saw, then I just lost all respect for DigitalBits :)
------
www.lyris-lite.net
Quote this post
#15 Posted: 07-02-2005 21:21
Phil Q
Member
Posts: 1815

Report this post
Quote:
You must have been viewing a defect copy, since, at thedigitalbits.com they rave about the transfer (with some minor quibbles) and call it the best there is, at least for now.


I don't think anybody's saying this is any worse than the existing editions. Most reviews say this is probably the best version of the film available, but importantly they also point out that the transfer doesn't improve significantly (if at all) on the previous versions. If you look at reviews of the Superbit they all say exactly the same thing.
Quote this post
#16 Posted: 07-02-2005 22:33
Flemming
Member
Posts: 30

Report this post
I own the Korean R3 version also and I find both the audio and video very satisfying. I have a Sanyo Z2, watching on a 104" screen. Would you be able to review that version maybe?
Quote this post
#17 Posted: 07-02-2005 23:05
Full Tense
Member
Posts: 20

Report this post
Some sites seem to indicate that one difference between the Korean R3 transfer and the US transfers is that there is much more EE in the latter.
Quote this post
#18 Posted: 07-02-2005 23:41
bradavon
Banned
Posts: 2907

Report this post
It's all down to personal choice. To one person this DVD is excellent quality but to another it's not. That's why you can't compare two different reviews by two different people.

A comparison review if possible is the way to go here.
Quote this post
#19 Posted: 08-02-2005 00:46
ulfingvar
Member
Posts: 6

Report this post
Ok, so where do I get the Korean R3 one? Or maybe I should wait for the real HD edition? Or maybe ignore the damn film altogether? Jeez, I refuse to pay $$$ (or £££) for inferior discs, not in this day and age:mad:
------
Ulf Claesson
Quote this post
#20 Posted: 08-02-2005 11:04
George Vader
Drunk
Posts: 42

Report this post
Cheers Michael, you just saved me £16 on a film I allready own a single disc of. :)
------
"You brought the *%$^&**  Pomeranian bowling?
Quote this post
#21 Posted: 08-02-2005 20:20
Hugh K.David
Member
Posts: 109

Report this post
Yeah, money saved all round. What is it with the US Besson licenses? New discs and docs for Nikita & Leon, neither of which appear to have been licensed for use in Europe, but a US edit of Nikita (MPAA cuts) and a DC of Leon? :confused:

Two of my top films ever, and still no truly decent edition on the horizon. Not good. :mad: Is this really the legacy Besson wants for his finest hours?
Quote this post
#22 Posted: 09-02-2005 14:54
temsonic
Member
Posts: 81

Report this post
There are some brief comparisons between the Korean R3 (2 disc), Japanese R2 (with DTS) and the R1 standard and Superbit editions mentioned in these two reviews:

http://www.totaldvd.net/cgi-bin/dvdreviews.php?reviewid=10383

http://www.totaldvd.net/cgi-bin/dvdreviews.php?dvdid=6320

The general consensus seems to be that all the R1 editions have below par picture quality whereas the Japanese and Korean editions have been transferred from a different master and are a vast improvment over the R1's.
------
My DVD Collection
Quote this post
#23 Posted: 09-02-2005 18:55
bradavon
Banned
Posts: 2907

Report this post
Hugh K.David The US Fiflth Element is the best in the world I understand.

Most of Besson's work is under different licensing in Europe, this isn't CT's fault.

Are you sure Nikita is cut in America? and if so are you saying the European DVDs are uncut? and if so are you saying the UK and/or French DVD? This is the first time I've ever heard Nikita being cut.
Quote this post
#24 Posted: 10-02-2005 12:20
HumanMedia
Member
Posts: 11

Report this post
The best "Fifth Element" image quality I have seen is the R2/R4 Superbit. Followed by the R1 Ultimate tieing with the Korean R3 Superbit, followed by the R1 Superbit, followed by the Original R1 release followed by the R2 UK and R2 german releases. The best audio is easily the R2 German Remaster DTS 6.1 mix.

Just this week the R4 Ultimate Edition (named there as Special Edition), may have the same transfer as the R2/R4 Superbit or a superior version again.

Re Leon. As mentioned before, I have compared the new R1 Deluxe with the second release of the R1 Uncut International Version, back and forth, upscaled over DVI on a 96" screen, and the Deluxe is definitely inferior in both image and audio.
Quote this post