Film Specs

  • Certificate:
    15
  • Running Time:
    113 minutes
  • Released:
    2004
  • Country:
    United States of America
  • Director:
    David S Goyer
  • Starring:
    Wesley Snipes
    Ryan Reynolds
    Jessica Biel
    Kris Kristofferson
    Parker Posey
    Dominic Purcell
  • Genre(s):
    Action
    Blockbuster

Blade: Trinity

10-12-2004 19:40 | 9658 views  |  Kevin O'Reilly  |  Show Backlinks  |  Other "Blade" Content

One of Hollywood's better action franchises takes a tumble with Blade: Trinity, a disappointing third outing for Marvel Comics' vampire-hunting vigilante. This is a by-the-numbers blockbuster that lacks the energy and originality of Stephen Norrington's first film and displays little of the style or invention of Guillermo Del Toro's superior sequel. Ironically, last year's Blade knock-off Underworld was a much better Blade movie than this.

The blame must rest with David S Goyer, who has written all three of the trilogy (as well as Dark City and the forthcoming Batman Begins) and also directs this one. As a writer, he seems bored with the series. His script this time is thin, uninspired and all too obviously an excuse for the action scenes. Worse, as a director, Goyer is just another anonymous Hollywood hack who churns out loud, flashy fights and chases that you've seen countless times before, set against dull, grey locations. He's not even a competent hack. There are moments in the fight sequences where you can see quite clearly that the actors are stage-fighting and faking their blows, an unforgivable slip-up in an expensive studio production.

In case you haven't been following the saga, Blade (Wesley Snipes) is a half-human, half-vampire superhero who fights a lonely, vengeful battle against the secret vampire underworld that exists beneath the surface of our society. Together with Whistler (Kris Kristofferson), his sidekick, father figure and one-man pit crew, he hunts and kills the bloodsuckers and their treacherous human "familiars". As this movie begins, the vampires have finally gained the upper hand, tricking Blade into leaving a staked human body behind and placing him on the FBI's most wanted list. The vampires want him out of the way because they've succeeded in tracking down the resting place of the first of their kind, none other than Dracula himself (Dominic Purcell). This isn't the Dracula Bram Stoker wrote about but an ancient warrior king whose legend inspired the stories. He's resurrected by the malevolent vampire leader Danica Talos (Parker Posey) and recruited to play a part in her plan for domination of the human world.

To help him escape the cops and foil Danica's plans, Blade is forced to take on some new allies - a secret resistance cell called the Nightstalkers, who fight the same war as Blade does but without his superpowers. The group includes the wisecracking Hannibal King (Ryan Reynolds), Whistler's babe of a daughter Abigail (Jessica Biel), blind science whiz Sommerfield (Natasha Lyonne) and the obligatory techie geek who is somehow able to supply his comrades with laser weapons straight out of Star Wars.

Since the script thinks we should care about what happens to the Nightstalkers, we ought to have been given more of a chance to get to know them but only Jessica Biel and Ryan Reynolds get any real screen time. Together with Wesley Snipes, they form the Trinity of the title so I guess if this film does well, we'll be seeing them in any further sequels. Biel does the kick-ass action-chick stuff convincingly enough but the script's attempts to flesh Abigail out by making her regret her direction in life fall flat. Her lost little girl routine just doesn't gel with her Lara Croft heroics. Although Biel is a gifted actress (check her out as Shannyn Sossamon's roommate in The Rules Of Attraction), she can do little with such a poorly conceived character.

Ryan Reynolds on the other hand gets a great role and he's the best thing in the film. Hannibal King is the bitchiest male hero in action movie history and this is a star-making part for the young actor who is so far best known for playing the annoyingly smarmy Van Wilder. Here he's a scream. In fact his dialogue is so much better than everyone else's that I wonder how much of it was improvised. Reynolds is also the only one of the Trinity who seems vulnerable in the action scenes, which makes him a sympathetic hero while the more indestuctible Snipes and Biel come off as video game figures. Someone ought to take a gamble on him and give him his own action movie. I also liked Parker Posey as the chain-smoking, tart-talking vampire villainess. Her interrogation of Ryan Reynolds is the film's best scene and, as a bonus, it contains a priceless gag involving a cute little dog which pays off later with an even funnier moment. I don't know if jokes like that fit comfortably into the Blade mythos but I was grateful for the laughs.

As the ultimate enemy for Blade, Dracula is a dead loss. This is the original vampire, an ancient monster who stalked the earth for millennia and is presumably the most fearsome being imaginable, yet he never comes across onscreen as anything more than a glowering muscleman and the most fearsome thing he does is kill a couple of goths. When we learn the reason he's lain dormant for centuries - that he became disgusted with humanity's lack of honour and its failure to "live by the sword" - he sounds like a schoolboy who's gone home in a sulk and taken his ball with him. It doesn't help that British actor Dominic Purcell, who plays Dracula in human form, looks like a pumped-up Colin Farrell and wears a strange-looking jumper with a ripped-out collar and a medallion that frankly makes him look gay. It gets worse when he morphs into a monster at the end and it resembles a computerised version of Tim Curry's Darkness from the movie Legend.

As for the vampires' dreadful plans for humanity, aren't they roughly the same as Stephen Dorff's dreadful plans for us in the first film? And not a million miles removed from the machines' plans for us in the Matrix pictures? We don't see much of the Vampire Nation this time either. One of the series' assets has been its concept of this powerful, sinister organisation - a kind of vampire Illuminati moving in the shadows of the human world and pulling our strings. This time we hear talk of it but all we see are Danica, her small band of thugs and the usual faceless henchvampires. When characters keep insisting that the humans are losing the battle, you might wonder to what?

Blade is Blade, for better or worse. Wesley Snipes snarls and hisses his way through the film like he's done twice before but his lack of a personality is more obvious in the company of stronger characters like Hannibal. Blade seems oddly detached from the plot - the best scenes and moments go to his co-stars - and Snipes gives the impression that he's just going through the motions, slaughtering vampires by the dozen because, well, that's what Blade does.

DVD Times Ratings

  • Overall: 
    5
    5 out of 10

Reader Ratings

  • Overall: 
    6.3

Comments

#1 Posted: 10-12-2004 20:40
pimpy
Member
Posts: 40

Report this post
Wesely Snipes is crap and always has been.
Quote this post
#2 Posted: 10-12-2004 21:29
jiffray
Member
Posts: 46

Report this post
I pretty much agree with your review Kevin! I love the first two blade films and had high hopes for this one when I read that the writer of the first two was directing this one. Sadly he ruined it by making it a 15 for a start. As a result the action is not as brutal, there's less of it and as you say, some of it is just badly done. Plus because of the lower age rating you are not shown as much as you saw in the prequels, instead you get flashing images in order to avoid showing too much gore etc. I didn't like how it was turned into a comedy!! Blade is not a comedy. Its OK to have a few laughs but this had too many attmpts at bad humour. The other gripe I have with the film is that fact that the Nightstalkers seem to be SUPER stong and despite being totally human, can take on a vampire toe to toe. Vampires have got far superior strength and endurance than a human. I can accept the Nightstalkers killing vampires from a distance or with weapons (even if some of the weapons in the film are absurd!) but it was stupid how tough these normal human Nightstalkers were. Either that or all the vampires in the film were extremely woosy. Drake was also a big disappointment as you never learn anything about him apart from the Drake 101 lesson the Nightstalkers give. Even though I didn't like the film even half as much as the prequels i'll still be buying it on DVD as it is still enjoyable BUT you have to take it at face value and just enjoy it for what it is.
------
If it bleeds, we can kill it!
Quote this post
#3 Posted: 10-12-2004 23:32
Alexei
Squire
Posts: 56

Report this post
Five seems very generous to me. This was well below average. 2/10.
------
20.
Quote this post
#4 Posted: 10-12-2004 23:43
Kevin O'Reilly
Contributor
Posts: 299

Report this post
jiffray, the film wouldn't have been made with a 15 in mind, the filmmakers would have been aiming for the American rating which was an R, the same as Blade I and II. Sometimes Hollywood films are cut from their American versions to get a lower UK certificate but they're not made with one in mind. I think the 15 reflects the blandness and ineffectiveness of the film rather than caused it. I was pleased to see the BBFC let a C-word through, that normally gets an 18 quicker than any amount of gore! That's a good point about the Nightstalkers being able to beat up vampires, that didn't occur to me.
Quote this post
#5 Posted: 10-12-2004 23:49
djnock
Member
Posts: 203

Report this post
I'm a massive "Blade" fan too, and was shocked at the standard of "Trinity" - those who disliked Del Toro's sequel were clearly just picky, since this is unacceptable...

If Goyer spent more time on the script, it might have been marginally better than it was. I suspect he was investing most of his time in writing "Batman Begins", and treated this to a one-draft rush job. At least that's what it felt like. Either that, or he just didn't know what to do on set (it's not the first time he directed though; he made the little-seen "Zig Zag" with Snipes).

And any film that features Dracula, and barely uses him (let alone making his death too easy) clearly has no guiding force behind the camera...

A crying shame.

D.J.
------
DVD Times Contributor
Quote this post
#6 Posted: 11-12-2004 00:01
badblokebob
The Duck
Posts: 737

Report this post
I had high hopes for this, what with the first two being pretty good and the screenwriter now being in total control. Sounds a bit rubbish though, obviously :( Might just wait for it on DVD now.
Quote this post
#7 Posted: 11-12-2004 03:41
bruce-leroy
Member
Posts: 13

Report this post
I totally agree with the comments regarding Ryan Reynolds. He really saved the film for me, and was the only decent thing in Blade Trinity. Some people seemed to be peeved by the presence of "Van Wilder" (a film I've not yet seen) in the film, but not me. Reynolds reminds me of a young Jason Lee, the way he delivers the one liners. :D
Quote this post
#8 Posted: 11-12-2004 14:29
Morpheus2000
Member
Posts: 48

Report this post
Good review Kevin, although I disagree with your comment about Parker Posey, she was awful and the worst vampire out all three Blade films.

In Blade Stephen Dorff made a great vampire and had a plan to conquer the world while Blade II had Luke Goss who simply wanted revenge as a Reaper. Pity Blade: Trinity falls so flat when it comes to the vampires.
------
“Just because you are a character, doesn’t mean you have character”
Quote this post
#9 Posted: 13-12-2004 11:43
Iain Boulton
Member
Posts: 85

Report this post
Did anyone feel this was an advert for the Ipod?

I found Blade Trinity entertaining but ultimatley we deserved more than what we got.
Quote this post
#10 Posted: 14-12-2004 00:36
SeanValen
Member
Posts: 57

Report this post
It was very good I thought, depends what you want from the film. Now Joss Whedon's stepped up the game on the vampire genre, with his work on Angel etc, Blade at the end of the day has limits, were just interested when he kills people and looks cool etc Snipes gave the character a edge the comics couldn't, but it may have gone to it's finish now, we need creative people like Joss working on these types of films, maybe get a R rated Angel film out, that'll kick ass.
Quote this post
#11 Posted: 14-12-2004 09:06
AntonyW
Member
Posts: 111

Report this post
Easily the poorest film in the series and one of the poorest films this year - which is a notable achievement considering the dross that's been released so far.
It's almost impossible to believe that this is the same writer from the first two films. It's not let down by it's direction which is competent but uninspired, but by the story, which is pathetic and filled with moronic touches - how is Jessica Biel able to hear if she's got a vampire behind her while being deafened by her iPod; why is Dracula now called Drake, it's not like he's trying to integrate into modern society; why, if he's so up for a fight, and such an uberbadass vampire, do we get the ridiculous chase scene; why do Blade and Whistler blow away loads of cops when they're actually innocents; if he's such a technical whizz why does Whistler have to stagger around to every single workstation to set off the self destruct sequence; why if there's only him and Blade do they have so many anyway?
There are two things this film succeeded in doing. One - it's probably killed the Blade series. Two - it manages to make Richard Roxburgh's Dracula look good.
Quote this post
#12 Posted: 14-12-2004 22:12
chimera01
Member
Posts: 218

Report this post
Dracula the Character seems to be going down the drain pretty quickly. Which is a shame since he's been the most fascinating vampire character around for a long time. It seems to me that he can't be made threatening anymore or the sad romantic he's as well.
A shame Blade slips up as well with this immortal character. Let's hope Guilermo del Toro does one just one more time. :cool:
Quote this post
#13 Posted: 17-12-2004 23:18
Chilano
Member
Posts: 5

Report this post
I have to say I was a big fan of the first two Blade films, but Blade Trinity really does fail to deliver. I think the real problem with it is that it doesn't really have that same serious feel to it, that was present in the first two. The comedic one liners are amusing admitedly, but do seem out of place in a Blade film. As for what Iain Boulton said about the iPod advert, I agree; you really do have to wonder how much Apple paid them. You get the feeling that the gaps between fight scenes are really just commericals for the iPod. Shame really, it had so much potential.
Quote this post
#14 Posted: 14-01-2005 12:12
Sir_Fireboard
Account Disabled
Posts: 1

Report this post
I'll still see this, but my expectations are considerable lower.
Quote this post
#15 Posted: 31-01-2005 20:22
mud
Member
Posts: 92

Report this post
jiffray, you say this has a lower agerating, and less gore ? I myself haven't seen this but I'm surprised of the agerating here in Finland, 18+. Blade too was 15+ here but now this 18, just confused. Coming to theaters next friday, then I'll see what it's worth.
------
Everything that has a beginning has an end..
Quote this post