Disc Specs

  • Region:
    2
  • Released:
    15th November 2004
  • Country:
    United Kingdom
  • Running Time:
    75 minutes
  • Screen Format:
    1.78:1 Anamorphic PAL
  • Discs / Sides / Layers:
    1 / 1 / Dual
  • Soundtracks:
    English Dolby Digital 5.1
    Spanish Dolby Digital 5.1
    Portuguese Dolby Digital 5.1
  • Subtitles:
    English
    English HoH
    Spanish
    Portuguese
  • Special Features:
    Deleted scenes
    Mushu's Guess Who
    The World of Mulan
    Voices of Mulan

    Bonus features NOT subtitled.
  • Distributor:
    Buena Vista

Film Specs

  • Certificate:
    U
  • Released:
    2004
  • Country:
    United States of America
  • Director:
    Darrell Rooney
    Lynne Southerland
  • Starring:
    (voices)
    Ming-Na
    BD Wong
    Mark Moseley
    Lucy Liu
    Harvey Fierstein
    Sandra Oh
    Gedde Watanabe
    Lauren Tom
    Jerry Tondo
    Pat Morita
    George Takei
    June Foray
    Freda Foh Shen
    Soon-Tek Oh
    Frank Welker
  • Genre(s):
    Animated
    Family
    Film

Mulan II

02-11-2004 08:00 | 20175 views  |  Michael Mackenzie  |  Show Backlinks


Mulan II is the latest release in Disney's direct to video range, a series of cheaply-produced sequels (popularly known as "cheapquels") written and storyboarded by the DisneyToon Studios unit (formerly the TV animation division) and farmed out to various animation houses, many of them situated in the Third World where labour (and, more often than not, the quality of the final product) is cheap. With the transitioning of the Feature Animation unit to 3D and the subsequent laying off of its 2D animators (barring those who made the leap to CGI in order to save their jobs), DisneyToon is the only unit still producing traditionally animated features, some of which have been given theatrical releases, but the majority of which are consigned to go straight to DVD and video. The original Mulan, created at the short-lived Feature Animation Florida division (also responsible for Lilo & Stitch, easily the best Disney movie for over a decade), was a solid if slightly flawed product, combining infectious comedy and an interesting visual style with genuine heart, actually managing to create a commentary about sexual politics in ancient China without coming across as forced. News that a cheapquel had been commissioned, involving none of the original creative crew, filled me with dread, but nothing could prepare me for the end result.

Diego Vega wrote an excellent article for SaveDisney.com, a web site set up by jilted former Disney executives Roy E. Disney (Walt's nephew) and Stanley Gold. This article, which is well worth reading, explains exactly what is wrong with Disney's cheapquels and breaks their construction into a simple formula, where the entire scenario for each can be created simply by substituting characters' names. Because this formula works extremely well for Mulan II, with only a couple of exceptions, I have reproduced it below:

New sequel involves parents (often aged Disney stars, but not always) and a child (usually next generation, though sometimes same from original movie). Parent nags the child with too many rules concerning any rule, and keeps secrets about any secret from the child. The child is ridiculed (real or imagined) by siblings or peers. The child rebels against the parent and proceeds to disobey the parent's rules because of a self-centered reason. The child makes a deal with an adversary to commit a rebellious act of betrayal. Child finds new or old love interest. Everything goes wrong, big climax ensues, adversary is defeated, usually by falling into a treacherous location. Child apologizes to the parent while parent apologizes to the child, thus maintaining family generational détente. Bland generic pop artists sing over end credits.



Um... no.

Okay, so you do need to make a few substitutions - for example, Mulan rebels against her fiancé rather than a parental figure - but that's basically it. Essentially, a month has passed since Mulan saved China (Mushu: "Seems like just last month, you and I were saving China." Mulan: "It was last month." Hahahahahahahahaha), and General Shang has proposed to her. Before they can get married, however, they are given an important mission by the Emperor: to chaperone his three daughters to the kingdom of Qui Gong, for an arranged marriage. Uh-oh! This doesn't sit well with feisty modern gurl Mulan, but she agrees to the Emperor's commands. Along the way, our intrepid band encounter all sorts of dangers, many of them created by Mulan's pet dragon Mushu, who has decided that he must break up Mulan and Shang, for reasons that are a little muddled. (See? There's that rebellious act.) Emotions are tested to breaking point and we get a whole lot of arguing as the three daughters decide they want to be free, just like Mulan, and run away from their arranged marriage. Will it all work out in the end? Does anyone actually care? I sure didn't.

Script-wise, the film is a complete mess. Characters now behave in ways that seem completely at odds with how they acted in the original film. Soldier Ping is now a bad pundit (where the hell did that come from?) and Mushu is now a conniving little rat whose only intent is to further his own cause. Stranger still, he now seems to be a homosexual. Don't believe me? Look at some of this dialogue: "I've just got some exfoliating cream in my eye!" "The theme is 'Think Pink'! Ya know, pink is the new red, girl!" Mulan's father now enters into bets with his mother, and Shang is a hot-headed fellow who is easily led astray and frequently jumps to the wrong conclusions. None of this makes any sense, but it all fits with the cheapquel rule of bending characters to fit pre-constructed narratives, instead of the other way around. Dialogue is beyond preachy: "My duty is to my heart" is the new mantra, and just in case you couldn't work it out for yourself, Shang informs us that "No-one should marry someone they don't love". Proving that nothing is sacred, Mulan II also bastardizes one of the original's songs, "A Girl Worth Fighting For", in addition to throwing in a whole bunch of lame new numbers. Oh, and if you thought that Christina Aguilera's tuneless wailings during the end credits of the original were bad enough, the sequel features Atomic Kitten, informing us that "[They] Wanna Be Like Other Girls". Sweet Jesus!

If there is anything praiseworthy about this film, it is the voice acting. It's not exactly exceptional, but for the most part all the voice actors from the original film have returned... barring Eddie Murphy, whose Mushu is now voiced by sound-alike Mark Moseley, who actually does a pretty good job of sounding like Murphy. I never thought I'd find myself saying this, but Eddie Murphy must have principals of some sort if he refused to appear in this. Ming-Na reprises her speaking role as Mulan, and she's actually pretty good, as if Lea Salonga, who once again provides her singing voice (it's just a shame that the songs are terrible). The animation, while usually bad, does on a handful of occasions show some signs of imagination, with a few interesting facial poses and some reasonably nice effects work. Having said that, none of this makes up for the fact that the film is a truly appalling piece of work that I found embarrassing to watch, and... you know what? It's easier just to call it shit.


DVD Presentation

Mulan II is presented in an aspect ratio of 1.78:1, anamorphically enhanced. This digital transfer is plagued by edge enhancement and compression artefacts, which are its only major problems, but both of which prove to be seriously distracting. The lack of film grain does the bland TV-quality animation no favours as it only serves to highlight its flat, lifeless nature. Overall, the results are pretty serviceable, but I'm glad it wasn't a good film that received this transfer.

The "film" features a serviceable but unremarkable Dolby Digital 5.1 track, with little in the way of surround action but perfectly comprehensible dialogue and a reasonable amount of bass. Some cheapquel DVDs have featured DTS tracks, but instead this one includes Spanish and Portuguese Dolby Digital 5.1 tracks. Subtitles are also included for the film, but not for any of the extras.


Extras

Bonus features are rather limited, beginning with a collection of four Deleted scenes that are as bad as anything in the finished film. They are introduced by directors Darrell Rooney and Lynne Southerland and producer Jennifer Blohm. At least, I assume that's who they are, because the latter two are never identified on-screen. (Rooney is identified during the Voices feature.)

Mushu's Guess Who is a silly little game in which the shadows of various characters are presented on the screen and you are asked to select from three different possible choices. Winning the game (yes, I did actually play it through!) provides you with... nothing! Ta-da!

The World of Mulan is a rather uninteresting feature split into three sections, each of which provide some perfunctory information about Chinese culture. Once you have looked at all three sections, you are taken to a special bonus game in which you select your year of birth and are told which animal you correspond with. Yawn. I find it hard to believe that even pre-school children find these games amusing.

Finally, Voices of Mulan takes you on a 3-minutes look at the various actors behind the on-screen characters. Eddie Murphy's non-appearance is conveniently glossed over and instead we get Ming-Na and others mechanically telling us about their characters and how great the film is.


A seal of quality if ever I saw one.

Overall

Mulan II is a horrible little piece of work that shouldn't really be classified as a film, given that it involves little to no actual artistry and was created purely for commerce. Take my advice and watch the original again instead. There is no reason to pollute either your mind or your kids' with this contemptible and patronizing example of animation.

DVD Times Ratings

  • Film:
    2
    2 out of 10
  • Video: 
    7
    7 out of 10
  • Audio: 
    8
    8 out of 10
  • Extras: 
    2
    2 out of 10
  • Overall: 
    3
    3 out of 10

Reader Ratings

  • Film 
    5.3
  • Video 
    0
  • Audio 
    0
  • Extras 
    0
  • Overall 
    6.3

Comments

#1 Posted: 02-11-2004 11:55
Jens
Account Disabled
Posts: 5

Report this post
I can't stand your way of looking at this movie. You are so blind to think this is a good movie as some of the past sequels at Disney were crap. It is your own choice to not like this movie, but you are seriously exaggerating! I saw this movie last night, and I thought it was a brilliant piece of work (coming from a low budget studio). You are right in some minnor ways, but I really disapprove this lack of critism. You are blind to see the beauty of this movie.
------
Greetings
Jens
Quote this post
#2 Posted: 02-11-2004 12:00
Michael Mackenzie
Contributor
Posts: 1647

Report this post
I think I made my problems with this movie pretty clear. The fact that every other cheapquel has been bad does not make it a bad film: rather, the fact that it is as bad as every other cheapquel makes it bad. I would have loved for this to be a decent sequel - I loved the original MULAN - but sadly the end result is a piece of garbage that isn't even fit for use as the babysitting device it was meant to be. What, might I ask, does it offer to you for you to call it "a brilliant piece of work" and a thing of "beauty"?
------

Reviews | DVDs | My Web Site

Quote this post
#3 Posted: 02-11-2004 13:51
Jens
Account Disabled
Posts: 5

Report this post
It has the 3 things a Disney movie needs to be a good movie: Drama, Humor and Heart. When I saw this movie I already had high hopes for it and if it was such a crappy movie like you say, I would have been very dissapointed, but it's not! It had the charm of the original Mulan all the way and I even have to admit that I almost cried at the scene you made a screenshot from with Mulan holding Shang above a river (thanks for the spoiler to other people btw). Maybe I just saw the movie different than you did, but it definately is not a sequel to put with sequels like Huncback of the Notre Dame II... I think the beauty of this movie will be confirmed by a lot of people when this DVD is released...
------
Greetings
Jens
Quote this post
#4 Posted: 02-11-2004 15:17
theSandman
Member
Posts: 74

Report this post
I have only seen the Trailer for this - and it was a little off putting - it just did not "feel" like the original - so I have doubt's about how good this is going to be.

Think I will wait for a bargain price on this one before investing then!!
Quote this post
#5 Posted: 02-11-2004 17:08
Michael Mackenzie
Contributor
Posts: 1647

Report this post
Jens:
What exactly is a spoiler about the screenshot? As far as I can tell it would only really be considered spoilerific in the eyes of someone who was already aware of the outcome.

Fair enough that you were able to appreciate the film in a way that I wasn't - I'm certainly glad that at least someone got some enjoyment out of it, and so that the slave labour animators didn't toil in vain - but to me this film felt like a big slap in the face. I would contest your claim that it includes drama, humour and heart. Drama, perhaps, but only in the most soap operatic manner. Humour I totally disagree with - there were a lot of moments that were clearly intended to be funny, but they were horrifyingly forced. Heart - no way. The whole thing reeked of manufactured swill. I couldn't even see these characters as the same ones in which I so easily managed to invest in the first film, let alone feel any sort of emotional connection to them.

Sandman:
I wouldn't even touch this if it was in the bargain bin! I'd prefer to simply pretend that it never existed and that the story ended with the original MULAN.
------

Reviews | DVDs | My Web Site

Quote this post
#6 Posted: 02-11-2004 19:27
theSandman
Member
Posts: 74

Report this post
Michael: Your screen shot comparrison does seem to speak volumes!!! And like I said viewing the Trailer for this sequel did not make me excited for this release at all. Anyone considering buying - have a look at the trailer and see what you think. I personally do not thin that there will be much of a stampeed (sorry for the spelling!!!):rolleyes:

What I would say is that its always nice to see/hear two conflicting opions on anything! It would be a very boring World otherwise!

I would love to see this now - BUT only to compare these two opinions. However, I fear I know which side I would be with - and I think that would be Mr. Reviewer :p

Oh, and Lilo and Stitch - what a hoot and a holler that was - that was a real suprise pleasure. :D - Now that film I could watch many, many times. Great stuff.
Quote this post
#7 Posted: 02-11-2004 19:32
ryonhill
Member
Posts: 118

Report this post
A very, very poor film. Another Disney cash-in.
Quote this post
#8 Posted: 02-11-2004 20:04
David Mackenzie
ISF Certified
Posts: 356

Report this post
Jens, you're a Disney/Buena Vista representative or executive, right? I'm just guessing because of your American spelling, and for the fact that you've seen this film. Unless it's already released in the US, in which case you can ignore that part. (I'm Mike's brother, in case you're wondering how I've seen it before the release. We had a good laugh watching it).

As for beauty? Are you joking? Just because it has some nice Chinese
locations and some well placed flowery moments doesn't mean it qualifies for a watchable film. It's a mismash of Saturday morning ideas, a parody of the predecessor if I ever saw it. If this was Mulan: The
Animated Series I doubt Michael would have been so harsh on it, but the fact that it's actually intended as a sequel is a disgrace.
------
www.lyris-lite.net
Quote this post
#9 Posted: 02-11-2004 20:07
David Mackenzie
ISF Certified
Posts: 356

Report this post
Oh BTW Sandman, good to see another fan of Lilo & Stitch. Did you know the men in suits at Disney cheapquelled that one as well? It's true... and not even 2 years after its release, IIRC.
------
www.lyris-lite.net
Quote this post
#10 Posted: 02-11-2004 20:36
theSandman
Member
Posts: 74

Report this post
Hi Lyris_1 :)

I guess that's Stitch: The Movie?? Is that a bad 'un?? (Just ordered it nice and cheap) Hope its not too bad!!
Quote this post
#11 Posted: 03-11-2004 09:34
Jens
Account Disabled
Posts: 5

Report this post
To lyris1:

I'm not a Disney/Buena Vista representative or executive, I am just a Disney fan that is trying to knock some sence into people. I think it's wrong to bad mouth a sequel in this way and not even let people have the chance to see it because it's "so bad". In this review, the 2 "evidence" pieces (the image comparing and the text from SaveDisney) don't make any sence. First of all, the SaveDisney text doesn't fit Mulan II in any way (Hey! It does fit an original Disney classic called "The Little Mermaid"! Let's bash that one too!) and the image comparing obviously shows that the animators of Mulan II tried to do their best with the low budget they had... It could have been A LOT worser.

I rest my case here, I know I can't convince people who are blind and just follow the "I hate Disney sequels" group. To people that have read this review (especially theSandman): Please do not get fooled by the negative thoughts about this movie, just go rent or buy this movie when it's out and watch it with an open mind. I'm sure you will not be as harsch as Michael here.
------
Greetings
Jens
Quote this post
#12 Posted: 03-11-2004 13:12
Michael Mackenzie
Contributor
Posts: 1647

Report this post
Jens:

These Disney sequels are hated for a reason: because they are awful. I personally have nothing to gain by preventing people from seeing this movie, but I am a DVD reviewer and I wouldn't be doing my job if I didn't make people fully aware of what they are letting themselves in for. I think that this is a terrible piece of work, so I said as much. I think I laid out my reasons for this pretty clearly, and I also think that most people would probably agree with me if they actually saw it, given what people's reactions have been to past cheapquels, some of them marginally better than MULAN II, and some of them marginally worse. You may have a point in saying that it is an improvement over THE HUNCHBACK OF NOTRE DAME 2 (certainly the animation now simply looks bland, unappealling and wooden now instead of downright vile), but that's not exactly saying much, is it?
------

Reviews | DVDs | My Web Site

Quote this post
#13 Posted: 23-02-2005 06:33
BobDad
Member
Posts: 1

Report this post
Why so much flaming over a children's movie? I agree with Makenzie on most parts. The change in characters was troubling for me, and the preview didn't impress me at all. But my five year old really loves it, and I must admit it was entertaining. At least I learned that Eddie Murphy has a rather good impersonator. But, as for arranged marriages, I thought there was a nice moral. Mulan didn't believe in arranged mariages, but she respected duty as well, and was willing to make the sacrifice. It reminded me of the moral from the first movie, that even "worthless females" can be heros. I don't think such points should be scorned as a Western movie questioning Chinese values. (China could use more such questioning.) Rather, China is not along in these issues, and our children benefit from the exposure.
Quote this post

Do you have a Times Network ID or DVD Times account? Sign in now!



Username:
Password:
Remember:


If not, why not register for one now and experience all the benefits of being a Times Network Member.