Film Specs

  • Certificate:
    15
  • Running Time:
    128 minutes
  • Released:
    2001/2004
  • Country:
    United States of America
  • Director:
    Richard Kelly
  • Starring:
    Jake Gyllenhaal
    Jena Malone
    Patrick Swayze
    Maggie Gyllenhaal
    Holmes Osbourne
    Mary McDonnel
    Drew Barrymore
    Noah Wyle
    James Duval
  • Genre(s):

Donnie Darko: Director's Cut

10-08-2004 14:00 | 33805 views  |  Matt Day  |  Show Backlinks  |  Other "Donnie Darko" Content

Donnie Darko, in its original form, has become the cult film of recent years, and this can largely be attributed to its ambiguity. Of course you get nowhere in cult film without being either extremely good, or extremely bad, and Donnie Darko falls happily into the former category, but it was the oblique nature of the film that really got people talking and turned it into a must see movie. The problem was, despite hours upon hours of expert pub analysis there are still many people that just don’t understand it, and many that argue that it just can’t be understood. This, combined with a desire to bring the film closer to his original cut (which was ordered to be shortened by the distributors) has spurred director Richard Kelly to revisit the film.

First things first, watching the Director’s Cut is not the best way to enjoy Donnie Darko. For the full experience watch the original film, explore the website, delve into the DVD special features, the answers are all there for you to find, and it’s a much more rewarding experience to rack your own brains. After all, that’s just the aspect that made the film a success in the first place, the more you spell out, the less fun it is, and that’s this versions biggest problem. Be warned, this review is written with the expectation of prior knowledge of the film, so spoilers will be abundant.The Director’s Cut clocks in at 128 minutes, quite a step up from the original’s 113, and the changes are myriad. Not content with throwing in chunks of extra footage, the entire running time is littered with additions, from major scenes, to tiny flashes.

The most talked about changes however have been the musical ones, Kelly was unable to secure the rights to two pieces of music in particular, the opening, as Donnie rides into town accompanied by Echo and the Bunnymen’s The Killing Moon was originally intended to be Never Tear Us Apart by INXS. This has been rectified here, but not only does it lack the subtle significance of the Bunnymen track, more importantly, it just isn’t as good. The Killing Moon set such a fantastic tone that the weak INXS track just can’t match, it may not have been the track of choice, but its inclusion was certainly serendipitous, and should have been left well alone. The other musical sticking point was Duran Duran’s Notorious present in the Sparkle Motion dance scene. Here Kelly wanted to use The Pet Shop Boys West End Girls however, for currently unknown reasons, Notorious remains. Musical changes aside though, there are many differences, including a couple of themes that run throughout the film.

Those that delved into either the website or the DVD will be familiar with the contents of Roberta Sparrow’s Philosophy of Time Travel, but Kelly, seemingly aware that many people wouldn’t have made that effort, has included passages from the book throughout the film. Not always in the order they are presented in the book, a number of scene transitions are now overlaid by the text, in an attempt to convey the meaning of the book to the audience. Whilst this does take away from the experience somewhat, it does accomplish its goal of making the film clearer, and is likely to be a product of the reaction to the film rather than part of Kelly’s original intention, but now viewers of the film are familiarised with the concepts of the manipulated dead, and the living receiver, as well as the metal and water concepts and the dreams that haunt the survivors of the tangent universe. Another persistent theme is a number of close ups of Donnie’s eye opening, overlaid with graphics foreseeing event to come, shots of water before he floods the school and fire before he burns down Jim Cunningham’s house. They’re a little heavy handed, implying that Donnie is not only receiving suggestions of what to do from Frank, but also visions, in fact Frank’s influence is something Kelly has very much played up. We now get to hear Frank’s voice many more times throughout the film, signposting events and more forcibly controlling Donnie, for instance telling us to watch closely, less we miss something, during the Cunning Visions video. Presumably hoping more people will notice Swayze’s pat on the behind of the child, foreshadowing the later character revelations, it strengthens the idea of Donnie being the living receiver, but also takes away from a popular interpretation of the film.

Many believe that once the tangent universe collapses, and Donnie returns to his bed, that he makes the choice to stay there, in order to prevent the events that occurred in the tangent universe, and save Gretchen and Frank from their fates. This version makes it clear that this is not Donnie’s role. The tangent universe was not a vision of the future bestowed upon Donnie, it was a freak rip in the 4th dimension, and one that has to be rectified properly or both the original dimension and the tangent will be destroyed. Donnie’s role is now to bring the tangent to a proper end, saving the original dimension, it seems now, as he lies in his bed, he’s laughing not because he’s making the grand choice but because he believes either that the last 28 days were a dream, or that he has changed the future, he doesn’t seem aware of his eminent fate. Donnie looks more like a puppet and less like the hero, a factor which is amplified by a number of exchanges with Karen Pomeroy (Drew Barrymore). Bringing a slightly confusing aspect into the film, Karen seems to have a hand in Donnie’s fate, in a new scene, after Graham Greene’s short story is removed from the syllabus the students begin to study Watership Down instead. Comparing Donnie’s visions to those of the rabbit Fiver, and how those visions save the warren, it seems Karen is pushing Donnie into trusting Frank. Earlier as the police are checking the class’s handwriting, there are extra shots of Donnie looking nervous, something Karen picks up on. This seems to explain the scene between her and Professor Monnitoff (Noah Wyle) “Donnie Darko?” “I know!” implying they were aware it was Donnie that flooded the school. This, combined with her vital cellar door clue add up to something being afoot with Ms. Pomeroy, is one of the few aspects of the Director’s Cut that is likely to inspire more questions than it answers.

With this Director’s Cut, aside from some minor niggles, Kelly has produced a film that now knows where it’s going, it seems the years, and possibly the endless questions, have clarified the concepts of the film in his mind, and those are now much more clearly conveyed to the audience. Kelly has produced a more focused, mature film, it’s still imperfect, but now for different reasons. It's a difficult decision as to which version is superior as this cut does take some of the fun away from the film. It’s much harder to invent mind boggling theories surrounding the film with what we are presented with now, but that was such a large aspect of the film’s success it’s almost a shame that the answers are now so straightforward. I still recommend that people make this the last stop on their tour of Donnie Darko’s world (which, trivia fans, this version places in Sarasota, Florida) as Donnie Darko is as much an experience as a movie, but for those still engaged in heated debate this will certainly settle a bet or two. Kelly however, clearly doesn’t want the debate to end, and has opened a few new avenues for discussion, albeit on less important issues.

A list of changes made in this Director's Cut of the film can be found here

DVD Times Ratings

  • Overall: 
    9
    9 out of 10

Reader Ratings

  • Overall: 
    9.7

Comments

#1 Posted: 10-08-2004 13:20
nwatts
Where it Falls
Posts: 155

Report this post
Can't wait to see it! Theatrical release set for this Thursday (12th August) here in Australia.

Interesting review, and good work on the changes list. I'm not sure whether or not i'm going to like this new version, as I loved the ambiguity of the initial release.
------
YMDb
Quote this post
#2 Posted: 10-08-2004 13:33
Will
DVD Collector
Posts: 5

Report this post
Matt - Firstly, well done on the review and the VERY lengthy process of doing the changes list. I was unsure whether Donnie Darko was really my thing so I waited until the director's cut was confirmed (the Prism edition looked very poor) - Will definitely be buying this!!!
------
Seven Deadly Sins. Seven Ways To Die.
Quote this post
#3 Posted: 10-08-2004 13:34
Tony Heugh
Member
Posts: 2

Report this post
I saw this at a surprise screening (well, it was called a surprise screening; it was very clear what the movie would be) and I think it makes the film too clear - half the fun was finding out what it was about, not too mention trying to explain it to your friends!

I did like that the pumpkin scene and a few more character development scenes were put back in, though.

As for the UK release date, it's due on the 27th of August only at chosen digital cinemas for...28 days :D. I also heard that the dvd will be out shortly after that - rumours suggest it'll have both versions.
Quote this post
#4 Posted: 10-08-2004 13:38
Matt Day
Contributor
Posts: 89

Report this post
metrodome have announced the dvd for october 4th
http://www.dvdtimes.co.uk/content.php?contentid=12037

and the fact that it is only in selected cinemas probably explains why i couldn't find a date for its release, and sadly seems to signify nobody near me is showing it as i checked all my locals :(
metrodome's site was under construction too which was no help! :p
Quote this post
#5 Posted: 10-08-2004 14:28
natski
Member/Contributor
Posts: 566

Report this post
nice one Matt. My immediate impression after seeing the original Donnie Darko was that it was one of the best American movies of the past decade. I'd be interested to see the Director's Cut... but... 'Never Tear Us Apart'.... :confused:
------

The 20 | Heat | Malcolm X

Quote this post
#6 Posted: 10-08-2004 14:30
bradavon
Banned
Posts: 2907

Report this post
The UK R2 is out some time in October it's listed somewhere on this site.

I'm really looking forward to seeing this but I hate it when films of this type explain to much. I may not end up buying the DVD after all.

I hope my local cinema shows it, it's not a digital one.

It's clear this would never have been released if it wasn't for the success of the original cut.
Quote this post
#7 Posted: 10-08-2004 14:58
Dodd
Member
Posts: 472

Report this post
Interesting review, I'm intrigued by this one. I think that so long as both versions are available, Kelly will avoid Lucas-like fan wrath. A seperate DVD of the director's cut would nice though, might wait for the inevitable Prism cheapy version!
Quote this post
#8 Posted: 10-08-2004 15:59
mrarmageddon
Member
Posts: 49

Report this post
I'll buy this when it's on sale.
I loved the original cut and the mystery of what it is about makes it more intriguing just like 2001 a space odyssey.I doubt this will be as good a cut of the film although I'm sure it's interesting none the less.;)
------
"We'll tear your soul apart!!!....."
Quote this post
#9 Posted: 10-08-2004 21:19
chimera01
Member
Posts: 218

Report this post
I bought the first version of this movie because it was supposed to be a brilliant movie.
After seeing it I can truthfully say I don't like it, the movie just isn't capturing enough. I made myself sit through it in the hope that the end would change my opinion. I don't see what all the fuzz is about.

A nice review dear sir.:cool:
Quote this post
#10 Posted: 11-08-2004 10:43
DarklyNoon
Member
Posts: 12

Report this post
This was an excellent article on Donnie Darko.

I can't wait to see the director's cut.
I first saw the original cut a long time ago, before the cult started. I had a copy from the internet and was just curious what this film with the strange name was about.
After watching the DVD over and over again and convincing all my friends to watch and buy that DVD, I have to say that the original cut of the film is one of the most important and innovative films ever made in film history.
I really mean this. Everything in this film is just perfect. The lyrics of each song fit to the scenes you see on the screen, the acting is more than superb, if the old farts at the Oscar commitee would have a slightest piece of taste, Jake and Richard would have got an Oscar.

The story is so mindbending, you can think and discuss this film for years......I could say much more.......

I just wanted to state my feelings about the imho best film ever made:D

I am VERY ancious to see the Dir. Cut but I also have a bit of fear in me that it mite destroy a bit of the magic that the original cut has and will ever have !!!!

cheers
DarklyNoon
------
"They Made Me Do IT"
Quote this post
#11 Posted: 11-08-2004 12:01
badblokebob
The Duck
Posts: 707

Report this post
Reactions to this new cut are interesting. I was in the US recently, just as it was being released (didn't get a chance to see it, sadly), and reviews seemed positive. One I recall said the "Donnie Darko" was one of the best films of the year, the DC made it one of the best films of the decade. Reviews over here, on the other hand, have been less sure, or bordering on negative (Empire magazine said that all Kelly has done is taken a star off his five-star debut).

Anyway, I'm looking forward to being able to judge for myself, though probably not until October 4th, sadly.
Quote this post
#12 Posted: 11-08-2004 12:35
Dodd
Member
Posts: 472

Report this post
That is interesting Bob, wonder if it has anything to do with the original cut's differing reactions on both sides of the Atlantic. Although I suspect most of that is hype - was it *really* that successful in the UK?

Still, so long as both versions are available, I'll be happy.
Quote this post
#13 Posted: 11-08-2004 13:04
mrarmageddon
Member
Posts: 49

Report this post
I don't understand how a film like this can be overlooked by the oscars,probably as it isn't overly mainstream or doesn't have Lord of the Rings in it's title.I'll be intrested to see what films do win oscars so I can rant furtherabout how screwed this film was out of critical acclaim from the academy awards when it's young director has produced a film showcasing a talent shown by Tarantino with Reservoir Dogs, Singleton with Boyz n the Hood or Robert Rodriguezwith El Mariachi. ;)
------
"We'll tear your soul apart!!!....."
Quote this post
#14 Posted: 11-08-2004 13:59
bradavon
Banned
Posts: 2907

Report this post
Interesting chimera01, do you think it's because you didn't get it? I don't know of anyone else who disliked it.

I have to say that the original cut of the film is one of the most important and innovative films ever made in film history.

While DD is a great film the concept of messing with your mind using strange imagery isn't a new one. David Lynch has been doing it for year, the big difference here is DD is a more accessible film with a young cast.

badblokebob I'd imagine the American critics prefer the DC as it explains much more, we all know most Americans prefer to have everything explained to them, look at the Ring remake.

DarklyNoon I'm sure the Oscar winners are not made up so much of actual talent (not that the people who win aren't talented) but who is hip and cool.

DD certainly should've been nominated for a best director Oscar but considering the flack it received upon it's US release this is hardly likely.

Dodd the cinema release wasn't that successful but it's sold bucket loads on DVD.
Quote this post
#15 Posted: 11-08-2004 19:34
chimera01
Member
Posts: 218

Report this post
Dear Bravadon,
I find a sad moment that folks always think that you don't get the movie if you don't like it. I just didn't like the movie, story and acting, I was dissappointed by the whole movie especially since every moviemagazine I read raved about this film.
It happens sometimes that a movie doesn't do it for you, this one doesn't do it for me I am afraid. Even if it is one of the most important movies in history, but who decides that?????:cool:
Quote this post
#16 Posted: 11-08-2004 19:52
bradavon
Banned
Posts: 2907

Report this post
I find a sad moment that folks always think that you don't get the movie if you don't like it.

Fair enough, it's a fair point considering the complicated nature of the film. I don't get parts of it.

In this case IMO the movie magazines are right to rave about this film but not it's certainly not the most important film in history, far from it. As I said David Lynch has been making films of this type for years.
Quote this post
#17 Posted: 11-08-2004 22:59
echidnaboy
Spiny Anteater
Posts: 181

Report this post
I saw the original when it first came out in the UK. All made perfect sense to me the first time, or so I thought. The DC looks like it'll disprove all my own theories about the film. What do I know, I'm only the audience.
I think it's great that all the sci-fi backstory is there for people to delve into, but it seems a shame that Kelly's decided to remove so much ambiguity by putting that stuff into the DC. What I liked most about the original was that it COULD be parallel universes, it COULD be time travel, it COULD be visitations, it COULD be schizophrenia... the DC sounds less open to interpretation.
Anyway, it's all a big rip-off of Harvey :D
Quote this post
#18 Posted: 17-08-2004 15:23
Sakari Hannula
Floater
Posts: 8

Report this post
echidnaboy: Good call on Harvey! :D I agree that the ambiguity of the story is perhaps the most important aspect in this film's appeal. When so many films are made to please the most obtuse among us, it's damn exhilarating when you come across a film that actually expects some thinking on your part.

I for one am not looking forward to this Director's Cut, as the original didn't/doesn't need fixing and based on Matt's excellent review, I feel the added material will most likely detract from the original's appeal rather than add to it. :(
Quote this post
#19 Posted: 20-08-2004 13:53
onthehour
Member
Posts: 7

Report this post
It sounds as though the most likely outcome is that big fans of the film will want a third cut. As with Apocalypse Now Redux there is stuff I want and stuff I don’t. In DD’s case I would love some (if not all) of the deleted scenes on the original disk to be included, but I don’t like the sound of the extracts from the book. Similarly, cleaned up sound is great, yet the song changing…
Quote this post
#20 Posted: 01-09-2004 21:05
Bluebottle
Member
Posts: 1

Report this post
Just as introduction - You've got a great site here, I have just spent an hour an a half browsing and reading. Just ahd to register.

Regarding the film - IMO the first film is mind blowingly great! Its true that the complete sense of bewilderment that it leaves you with is a huge part of its attraction. I mean, what other film have you watched recently that encouraged you to think as much?? That said, I'm all for finding out some answers, after all we have had long enough to conjure up our own questions and theories.

One big question - Have I missed the UK Cinema release? I am getting conflicting info from all over the net. I will settle for buying the DVD but I would like to see it on the big screen if poss as I didn't manage that with the original. Anyone any ideas?
------
"When we strive to become better than we are, everything around us becomes better too." The Alchemist - Paulo Coelho
Quote this post
#21 Posted: 12-09-2004 20:40
Colin Polonowski
Administrator
Posts: 412

Report this post
From listening to the commentary, it's clear that Kelly almost thinks of the director's cut as a separate entity. He doesn't prefer it over the threatrical version and as he puts it, he was just being self indulgent with most of the restorations - not to make a better film, but to make the film that he'd originally envisioned. And I tend to agree with him - the theatrical release is the one that sticks in the memory as being cryptic and thought provoking, while this director's cut seems far more rounded in terms of storytelling and a little more mainstream. I enjoyed the director's cut more as I didn't have to watch and absorb every minute in order to understand what was going on, but I can see that by explaining and making things that little bit smoother it takes something away from the film - making it far less of a talking point than the original theatrical cut.
------

Colin Polonowski, Editor
All My Reviews | My Film Journal | CD Times

Quote this post