Donnie Darko: Director's Cut
10-08-2004 14:00 | 33805 views | Matt Day | Show Backlinks | Other "Donnie Darko" Content
Donnie Darko, in its original form, has become the cult film of recent years, and this can largely be attributed to its ambiguity. Of course you get nowhere in cult film without being either extremely good, or extremely bad, and Donnie Darko falls happily into the former category, but it was the oblique nature of the film that really got people talking and turned it into a must see movie. The problem was, despite hours upon hours of expert pub analysis there are still many people that just don’t understand it, and many that argue that it just can’t be understood. This, combined with a desire to bring the film closer to his original cut (which was ordered to be shortened by the distributors) has spurred director Richard Kelly to revisit the film. First things first, watching the Director’s Cut is not the best way to enjoy Donnie Darko. For the full experience watch the original film, explore the website, delve into the DVD special features, the answers are all there for you to find, and it’s a much more rewarding experience to rack your own brains. After all, that’s just the aspect that made the film a success in the first place, the more you spell out, the less fun it is, and that’s this versions biggest problem. Be warned, this review is written with the expectation of prior knowledge of the film, so spoilers will be abundant.The Director’s Cut clocks in at 128 minutes, quite a step up from the original’s 113, and the changes are myriad. Not content with throwing in chunks of extra footage, the entire running time is littered with additions, from major scenes, to tiny flashes.
The most talked about changes however have been the musical ones, Kelly was unable to secure the rights to two pieces of music in particular, the opening, as Donnie rides into town accompanied by Echo and the Bunnymen’s The Killing Moon was originally intended to be Never Tear Us Apart by INXS. This has been rectified here, but not only does it lack the subtle significance of the Bunnymen track, more importantly, it just isn’t as good. The Killing Moon set such a fantastic tone that the weak INXS track just can’t match, it may not have been the track of choice, but its inclusion was certainly serendipitous, and should have been left well alone. The other musical sticking point was Duran Duran’s Notorious present in the Sparkle Motion dance scene. Here Kelly wanted to use The Pet Shop Boys West End Girls however, for currently unknown reasons, Notorious remains. Musical changes aside though, there are many differences, including a couple of themes that run throughout the film.
Those that delved into either the website or the DVD will be familiar with the contents of Roberta Sparrow’s Philosophy of Time Travel, but Kelly, seemingly aware that many people wouldn’t have made that effort, has included passages from the book throughout the film. Not always in the order they are presented in the book, a number of scene transitions are now overlaid by the text, in an attempt to convey the meaning of the book to the audience. Whilst this does take away from the experience somewhat, it does accomplish its goal of making the film clearer, and is likely to be a product of the reaction to the film rather than part of Kelly’s original intention, but now viewers of the film are familiarised with the concepts of the manipulated dead, and the living receiver, as well as the metal and water concepts and the dreams that haunt the survivors of the tangent universe. Another persistent theme is a number of close ups of Donnie’s eye opening, overlaid with graphics foreseeing event to come, shots of water before he floods the school and fire before he burns down Jim Cunningham’s house. They’re a little heavy handed, implying that Donnie is not only receiving suggestions of what to do from Frank, but also visions, in fact Frank’s influence is something Kelly has very much played up. We now get to hear Frank’s voice many more times throughout the film, signposting events and more forcibly controlling Donnie, for instance telling us to watch closely, less we miss something, during the Cunning Visions video. Presumably hoping more people will notice Swayze’s pat on the behind of the child, foreshadowing the later character revelations, it strengthens the idea of Donnie being the living receiver, but also takes away from a popular interpretation of the film. Many believe that once the tangent universe collapses, and Donnie returns to his bed, that he makes the choice to stay there, in order to prevent the events that occurred in the tangent universe, and save Gretchen and Frank from their fates. This version makes it clear that this is not Donnie’s role. The tangent universe was not a vision of the future bestowed upon Donnie, it was a freak rip in the 4th dimension, and one that has to be rectified properly or both the original dimension and the tangent will be destroyed. Donnie’s role is now to bring the tangent to a proper end, saving the original dimension, it seems now, as he lies in his bed, he’s laughing not because he’s making the grand choice but because he believes either that the last 28 days were a dream, or that he has changed the future, he doesn’t seem aware of his eminent fate. Donnie looks more like a puppet and less like the hero, a factor which is amplified by a number of exchanges with Karen Pomeroy (Drew Barrymore). Bringing a slightly confusing aspect into the film, Karen seems to have a hand in Donnie’s fate, in a new scene, after Graham Greene’s short story is removed from the syllabus the students begin to study Watership Down instead. Comparing Donnie’s visions to those of the rabbit Fiver, and how those visions save the warren, it seems Karen is pushing Donnie into trusting Frank. Earlier as the police are checking the class’s handwriting, there are extra shots of Donnie looking nervous, something Karen picks up on. This seems to explain the scene between her and Professor Monnitoff (Noah Wyle) “Donnie Darko?” “I know!” implying they were aware it was Donnie that flooded the school. This, combined with her vital cellar door clue add up to something being afoot with Ms. Pomeroy, is one of the few aspects of the Director’s Cut that is likely to inspire more questions than it answers.
With this Director’s Cut, aside from some minor niggles, Kelly has produced a film that now knows where it’s going, it seems the years, and possibly the endless questions, have clarified the concepts of the film in his mind, and those are now much more clearly conveyed to the audience. Kelly has produced a more focused, mature film, it’s still imperfect, but now for different reasons. It's a difficult decision as to which version is superior as this cut does take some of the fun away from the film. It’s much harder to invent mind boggling theories surrounding the film with what we are presented with now, but that was such a large aspect of the film’s success it’s almost a shame that the answers are now so straightforward. I still recommend that people make this the last stop on their tour of Donnie Darko’s world (which, trivia fans, this version places in Sarasota, Florida) as Donnie Darko is as much an experience as a movie, but for those still engaged in heated debate this will certainly settle a bet or two. Kelly however, clearly doesn’t want the debate to end, and has opened a few new avenues for discussion, albeit on less important issues.A list of changes made in this Director's Cut of the film can be found here



Comments
Where it Falls
Posts: 155
Interesting review, and good work on the changes list. I'm not sure whether or not i'm going to like this new version, as I loved the ambiguity of the initial release.
------
YMDb
DVD Collector
Posts: 5
------
Seven Deadly Sins. Seven Ways To Die.
Member
Posts: 2
I did like that the pumpkin scene and a few more character development scenes were put back in, though.
As for the UK release date, it's due on the 27th of August only at chosen digital cinemas for...28 days :D. I also heard that the dvd will be out shortly after that - rumours suggest it'll have both versions.
Contributor
Posts: 89
http://www.dvdtimes.co.uk/content.php?contentid=12037
and the fact that it is only in selected cinemas probably explains why i couldn't find a date for its release, and sadly seems to signify nobody near me is showing it as i checked all my locals :(
metrodome's site was under construction too which was no help! :p
Member/Contributor
Posts: 566
------
The 20 | Heat | Malcolm X
Banned
Posts: 2907
I'm really looking forward to seeing this but I hate it when films of this type explain to much. I may not end up buying the DVD after all.
I hope my local cinema shows it, it's not a digital one.
It's clear this would never have been released if it wasn't for the success of the original cut.
Member
Posts: 472
Member
Posts: 49
I loved the original cut and the mystery of what it is about makes it more intriguing just like 2001 a space odyssey.I doubt this will be as good a cut of the film although I'm sure it's interesting none the less.;)
------
"We'll tear your soul apart!!!....."
Member
Posts: 218
After seeing it I can truthfully say I don't like it, the movie just isn't capturing enough. I made myself sit through it in the hope that the end would change my opinion. I don't see what all the fuzz is about.
A nice review dear sir.:cool:
Member
Posts: 12
I can't wait to see the director's cut.
I first saw the original cut a long time ago, before the cult started. I had a copy from the internet and was just curious what this film with the strange name was about.
After watching the DVD over and over again and convincing all my friends to watch and buy that DVD, I have to say that the original cut of the film is one of the most important and innovative films ever made in film history.
I really mean this. Everything in this film is just perfect. The lyrics of each song fit to the scenes you see on the screen, the acting is more than superb, if the old farts at the Oscar commitee would have a slightest piece of taste, Jake and Richard would have got an Oscar.
The story is so mindbending, you can think and discuss this film for years......I could say much more.......
I just wanted to state my feelings about the imho best film ever made:D
I am VERY ancious to see the Dir. Cut but I also have a bit of fear in me that it mite destroy a bit of the magic that the original cut has and will ever have !!!!
cheers
DarklyNoon
------
"They Made Me Do IT"
The Duck
Posts: 707
Anyway, I'm looking forward to being able to judge for myself, though probably not until October 4th, sadly.
Member
Posts: 472
Still, so long as both versions are available, I'll be happy.
Member
Posts: 49
------
"We'll tear your soul apart!!!....."
Banned
Posts: 2907
I have to say that the original cut of the film is one of the most important and innovative films ever made in film history.
While DD is a great film the concept of messing with your mind using strange imagery isn't a new one. David Lynch has been doing it for year, the big difference here is DD is a more accessible film with a young cast.
badblokebob I'd imagine the American critics prefer the DC as it explains much more, we all know most Americans prefer to have everything explained to them, look at the Ring remake.
DarklyNoon I'm sure the Oscar winners are not made up so much of actual talent (not that the people who win aren't talented) but who is hip and cool.
DD certainly should've been nominated for a best director Oscar but considering the flack it received upon it's US release this is hardly likely.
Dodd the cinema release wasn't that successful but it's sold bucket loads on DVD.
Member
Posts: 218
I find a sad moment that folks always think that you don't get the movie if you don't like it. I just didn't like the movie, story and acting, I was dissappointed by the whole movie especially since every moviemagazine I read raved about this film.
It happens sometimes that a movie doesn't do it for you, this one doesn't do it for me I am afraid. Even if it is one of the most important movies in history, but who decides that?????:cool:
Banned
Posts: 2907
Fair enough, it's a fair point considering the complicated nature of the film. I don't get parts of it.
In this case IMO the movie magazines are right to rave about this film but not it's certainly not the most important film in history, far from it. As I said David Lynch has been making films of this type for years.
Spiny Anteater
Posts: 181
I think it's great that all the sci-fi backstory is there for people to delve into, but it seems a shame that Kelly's decided to remove so much ambiguity by putting that stuff into the DC. What I liked most about the original was that it COULD be parallel universes, it COULD be time travel, it COULD be visitations, it COULD be schizophrenia... the DC sounds less open to interpretation.
Anyway, it's all a big rip-off of Harvey :D
Floater
Posts: 8
I for one am not looking forward to this Director's Cut, as the original didn't/doesn't need fixing and based on Matt's excellent review, I feel the added material will most likely detract from the original's appeal rather than add to it. :(
Member
Posts: 7
Member
Posts: 1
Regarding the film - IMO the first film is mind blowingly great! Its true that the complete sense of bewilderment that it leaves you with is a huge part of its attraction. I mean, what other film have you watched recently that encouraged you to think as much?? That said, I'm all for finding out some answers, after all we have had long enough to conjure up our own questions and theories.
One big question - Have I missed the UK Cinema release? I am getting conflicting info from all over the net. I will settle for buying the DVD but I would like to see it on the big screen if poss as I didn't manage that with the original. Anyone any ideas?
------
"When we strive to become better than we are, everything around us becomes better too." The Alchemist - Paulo Coelho
Administrator
Posts: 412
------
Colin Polonowski, Editor
All My Reviews | My Film Journal | CD Times