Disc Specs

  • Region:
    ALL
  • Released:
    Out Now
  • Country:
    United States of America
  • Running Time:
    122 minutes
  • Screen Format:
    2.35:1 / 1080P / AVC/H.264/MPEG4
  • Discs / Type:
    1 / BD50
  • Soundtracks:
    5.1 Uncompressed
    Dolby Digital 5.1
  • Subtitles:
    French
    Spanish
    English (Hard of hearing)
  • Special Features:
    Making Of
    Working with the Coens
    Diary of a county sheriff
  • Distributor:
    Miramax/Buena Vista

Film Specs

  • Certificate:
    R
  • Released:
    2007
  • Country:
    United States of America
  • Director:
    Joel Coen
    Ethan Coen
  • Starring:
    Tommy Lee Jones
    Javier Bardem
    Josh Brolin
    Kelly MacDonald
    Woody Harrelson
  • Genre(s):
    Black Comedy
    Crime
    Cult
    Suspense

No Country For Old Men

19-03-2008 12:00 | 4409 views  |  John White  |  Show Backlinks  |  Other "No Country For Old Men" Content

The Film

I can see why people have got hot under the collar about the latest film from the Coen Brothers, and specifically how we have rated it here at DVD Times. From my own jaundiced point of view, I disagree strongly with the reviews we gave the good brothers of their two previous films, Intolerable Cruelty and The Lady Killers, as both enterprises seemed to me poor imitations of their best work. You, like me, may have wondered just what was so darn good about these almost natureless movies which lacked heart, fun, or human insight as to justify our scores and praise. So I have to say I welcome the scepticism to the new work which Noel brought to his review, and like Noel, I was quite prepared to ask whether the film-makers had started to head downhill at an alarming rate. Having now seen the film twice, I would have to declare that No Country For Old Men reminded me more of the best of the Coen's work than evidence of artistic bankruptcy.

I have written before about the strange emphasis placed on films to justify their sex and violence, and I am struck again by how some detractors of this film use the innate violence and nihilism of this project to decry its quality. Personally, I see the uncomprehending perspective of the mechanical and inevitable harm caused by Javier Bardem's Chigurh to be the whole point of the film rather than something to be apologised for. This same depressing point seemed just as strong in the universally praised Fargo when the family friendly cop shook her head at the mayhem of men in the wood chipper and bungled kidnaps as motivated simply "for a little money", so why is this such a problem here for some. Perhaps that's because the point is more firmly driven home in this newest venture with good people feeling dumbfounded and decidedly mortal at the unrelenting progression of violence.

Clydefro's review does an excellent job at getting to why the film is so accomplished, and I find myself only wanting to add to his thoughts some more personal comments about why this film is so effective now in our world. The setting is the post Vietnam and drug running 1980's, and it seems to me that the clear implication of this movie's release now is to further capture that mortal fear that has crept into many a western mind since the recent rise in unfathomable killings which have included murdering martyrs as well as pointless tragedies and fatal misfortune.

Bardem's killer here has been characterised by some as the devil himself, or our inevitable fate, but to me it is important to recognise him as a remorseless assassin who kills to keep his word and to make his point, even if that involves the slaughter of innocents or unnecessary carnage. He is an evangelical monster whom money will not stop, and mercenaries can't comprehend. To my mind, he is the walking talking symbol of a new kind of threat in an otherwise all American landscape, rather than an updated version of the pale bloke with a scythe. Anton Chigurh is the embodiment of that thing that is coming for us, that no matter how clever we are, or how carefully we tread, it will keep coming. What makes him so powerful now is how he forces us to recognise how unsafe and vulnerable our world feels despite our attempts to get a bit of security. In our modern lives, we try to be cute and to grab our chances, yet we learn that, at home, at work or on holiday, we are never truly protected. Like Llewellyn Moss thought he knew what he was doing with his discarded loot in the desert, we have learned that some people can't be stopped because they won't be bought off and won't get scared off either. This new kind of threat won't stop until it keeps all its promises.

Reducing this film to echoes of the grave and rogue chance does it no justice. This may simply be a Texas misadventure but the sheer randomness of fate within it is fueled by our global insecurity rather than a simple personal mortality, and it proves very adept at shaking the viewer whilst remaining subtle about any more pointed comments. The subtlety is there though as we witness the decidedly un-American Chigurh and the failure of his very American opponents to come to terms with him - our world is not safe for the just man, the stubborn man, the corporate man, or the mercenary. Some have criticised the film for not being brave enough in its allegory, but this is not a polemic, it's a moral piece about how at risk we all find ourselves whether we are rich, powerful, clever or even humble.

The script and dialogue are excellent and allow each of the protagonists enough to make their parts convincing and entertaining, and the cinematography gives the film an arid aspect. Plot is secondary to the spirit of the story and the mood of suspense, and a lot is left to the viewer to work out for themselves in terms of pure mechanics, but the construction is artful and the characters are rich through comparison. In short, I think that this is their best movie since The Big Liebowski and that it arrests a decline in the brothers powers by returning to the visceral element of Blood Simple and slipping in commentary which up 'till now their movies avoided. I am glad that their future will not be the anodyne or the dumb suggested by their recent output, and that they have reached for a statement at last. No Country For Old Men is darned good.



The Disc


The Blu-ray from Buena Vista contains the same content as the R1 disc that we recently covered and it comes on what is reported as an unlocked disc. The transfer is extremely rich and very detailed in picking up the landscape and environment of the film's setting, the contrast is perfect, edges are natural looking and the baked arid aspect is well captured in the colours. The disc comes with two audio mixes, a normal 5.1 and an uncompressed 5.1. The latter is clearly preferable and gives superb clarity to the dialogue, along with a fully three dimensional sound when necessary. The sequence where Moss runs from Chigurh into the border town night is excellently managed with perspective changing along with the sound mix and the chaos and bullets ringing around the speakers. The soundtrack is really tested in the moments of explosions which seldom punctuate the very low key dialogue and long periods of silence, and the sub-woofer is used well in scenes such as the pharmacy explosion. The uncompressed track is a wonderful addition to the film which justifies a hi def purchase on its own.

The extras are the same sorry ones which Clydefro covered, with very short pieces on Tommy Lee Jones' character and the cast and crew's appreciation of the Coen brothers. The Making of featurette has a little more meat but the brothers answer questions in their usual shoe-gazing style as the major casting decisions are explained along with the attempts to capture the period of the 1980's. Bardem comes over as an interesting character, and Lee Jones seems likely to be a fine poker player which his non-committal remarks. There is no trailer included, and the menu used here is very similar to an ordinary DVD style and you will find the pop-up menu to be exactly the same. This means that the screen is obscured by the menu as the film's sound plays on which seems rather redundant for such a function.

Summary

A fine movie which I believe is more of our time than others have given it credit for is given an excellent transfer with superb uncompressed sound. The extras are very light and the menus are rudimentary, but still this is well worth picking up

Sponsored Review

This review is brought to you through our partners at DVD Pacific, an excellent retailer offering low prices, affordable shipping and five star customer service making them DVDTimes' favoured direct import route for R1 DVD..

To ensure continued reviews of the latest Region 1 titles please help support DVDTimes by purchasing your DVDs through the following graphic link...



See our full range of DVDPacific Sponsored Reviews

DVD Times Ratings

  • Film:
    9
    9 out of 10
  • Video: 
    9
    9 out of 10
  • Audio: 
    10
    10 out of 10
  • Extras: 
    4
    4 out of 10
  • Overall: 
    9
    9 out of 10

Reader Ratings

  • Film 
    8
  • Video 
    9.3
  • Audio 
    9.3
  • Extras 
    4.7
  • Overall 
    9.3

Comments

#1 Posted: 19-03-2008 12:39
Mani
Membre Massif
Posts: 17

Report this post

Fantastic film!!


------

Nice night for a walk.

Quote this post
#2 Posted: 19-03-2008 14:21
Richard Booth
Contributor & Filmmaker
Posts: 980

Report this post

I don't think the allegory is nearly brave enough; whilst the depth of your analysis is commendable, this film remains a simple chase film that allows its viewers to think that it's a lot more intelligent and deep than it really is. The execution is stylish, granted, but I feel that films like Fargo and A Simple Plan handle similar themes with more skill.

2007 produced one near classic - There Will Be Blood. No Country for Old Men is an enjoyable film that is unlikely to be remembered in a generation's time.


------
We do not tell time, time only tells us.
Quote this post
#3 Posted: 19-03-2008 14:56
WJB
Member
Posts: 72

Report this post

A superb review, and a much-needed reappraisal! Whilst I understand and appreciate the objections of the previous review, I think this film is certainly deserving of its status.

It's a shame there aren't more extras included (trailers anyone?!), but the excellent transfer more than makes up for it.

Quote this post
#4 Posted: 19-03-2008 17:08
john white
Contributor
Posts: 173

Report this post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Booth:


I don't think the allegory is nearly brave enough; whilst the depth of your analysis is commendable, this film remains a simple chase film that allows its viewers to think that it's a lot more intelligent and deep than it really is. The execution is stylish, granted, but I feel that films like Fargo and A Simple Plan handle similar themes with more skill.

2007 produced one near classic - There Will Be Blood. No Country for Old Men is an enjoyable film that is unlikely to be remembered in a generation's time.





I think "simple chase film" is incorrect, Rik, as this is a film where the three men chasing one another never actually meet, and there are even repeated scenes in the screenplay for Moss and Chigurh (the bloody shirt borrowings). The film is far from genre expectations in terms of pay-offs to the chases as well and even the killings defeat expectation as well (Kelly M's death is only signalled by Bardem wiping his shoes, and Harrelson dies in a deliberate off-beat). As I say above, I know other people wanted more direct comments and clear links to the post 9/11 world and the film does leave it up to the viewer to find them. From my point of view, I enjoy this effort as a viewer much more than I do more literal film-making which wear politics openly. I'd love someone to make a much more aggressive statement about that, but realistically I don't see modern Hollywood to be as supportive of that message as I am :)

I do hope There Will Be Blood is as good as other people say but I can't say I love Day Lewis' acting normally and will be relying on the word of good judges like yourself to prove me wrong when I do get to see it.

Quote this post
#5 Posted: 19-03-2008 23:55
tonyleung
Member
Posts: 813

Report this post

I presume you mean Uncompressed PCM 5.1 not Uncompressed Dolby Digital 5.1 John?

I think the USA BD has DD5.1 or PCM 5.1.

Quote this post
#6 Posted: 20-03-2008 00:55
seawolf
seawolf
Posts: 6

Report this post

Nice review! Let me just add that the novel's setting is the same as the film's: not in the 1920s, but the beginning of the 80s. I'd also like to echo your feeling that to call this a "simple chase movie" is missing not only its point, but, as you make clear, the many ways in which it differs from genre and how it breaks from genreconventions. Furthermore, a film does not need to have a singular clearcut message in order for it to communicate something of value to the viewer. As both you and Clydefro have shown, the allegorical layers of the film are legion. It would strike me as strange that so many people can have such valid interpretations of a film that is as bad as the original review of the film on this site seemed to imply - or rather, said outright. As for some people complaining that the film is too obtuse or fails to spell out its message, well... If people prefer to be spoonfed their messages, I guess they have to
stick to the lesson plan of one Paul Haggis.

Quote this post
#7 Posted: 20-03-2008 07:40
john white
Contributor
Posts: 173

Report this post

Quote:
Originally Posted by tonyleung:


I presume you mean Uncompressed PCM 5.1 not Uncompressed Dolby Digital 5.1 John?

I think the USA BD has DD5.1 or PCM 5.1.



You are quite right :)

Quote this post
#8 Posted: 20-03-2008 07:45
john white
Contributor
Posts: 173

Report this post

Quote:
Originally Posted by seawolf:


Nice review! Let me just add that the novel's setting is the same as the film's: not in the 1920s, but the beginning of the 80s.





Put that right too :o

Quote this post