Film Specs

  • Certificate:
    12A
  • Running Time:
    97 minutes
  • Released:
    2004
  • Country:
    United States of America
  • Director:
    Brett Ratner
  • Starring:
    Pierce Brosnan
    Woody Harrelson
    Salma Hayek
    Don Cheadle
    Naomie Harris
  • Genre(s):
    Action
    Comedy

After The Sunset

21-11-2004 16:30 | 6387 views  |  Kevin O'Reilly  |  Show Backlinks

After The Sunset is a reminder of what star quality can do for a movie. Here's a run of the mill heist flick with a very mediocre script that still manages to entertain thanks to the chemistry of its two leading men, Pierce Brosnan and Woody Harrelson. Brosnan's cool, gentleman thief makes a great contrast for Harrelson's hot-headed goofball. It's fun to watch these two argue, bond and try to one-up each other. Brosnan is always good value for money but it's nice to see the underrated Harrelson, so good in The People Vs Larry Flynt, back in a major role. Director Brett Ratner made his name by finding a similarly easy chemistry between Jackie Chan and Chris Tucker in the Rush Hour films, and using it to overcome their weak scripts. Technically, Ratner's directing is no more than functional but he obviously has a rapport with actors.

Brosnan plays Max Burdett, a brilliant professional thief who, together with his longtime girlfriend and partner Lola (Salma Hayek), has pulled off some of the most daring robberies in history and never been caught. After stealing two priceless Napoleon diamonds from under the nose of FBI agent Stan Lloyd (Woody Harrelson), Max and Lola have decided to quit while they're ahead and they've retired to a Caribbean paradise to live off their immoral earnings. Agent Lloyd however can't get over his humiliation and he follows the couple to their new home, booking a hotel along the beach from them and keeping them under his watchful eye. Lloyd believes Max's retirement is a ruse and that the real reason he's on the island is to rob a cruise ship which is due in port any day now and, as a promotion for its maiden voyage, is displaying the third Napoleon diamond.

Besides the two stars, After The Sunset boasts beautiful locations and beautiful actresses. Salma Hayek provides her usual Latin spunk and British actress Naomie Harris (from 28 Days Later) is funny as a local cop. Don Cheadle meanwhile creates an interesting, three-dimensional villain - an entrepeneurial American gangster who's set himself up as the island's crime boss - although disappointingly, the script gives him very little to do. That script, by Paul Zbyszewski and Craig Rosenberg, keeps letting the side down. The relationships between the characters are on a sitcom level while most of the jokes wouldn't meet the standards of a good sitcom. Worse, the heist the whole movie builds up to is a tremendous disappointment. It's unconvincing and confusing and it has nothing like the excitement of the robberies in Ocean's Eleven or Brosnan's earlier, better The Thomas Crown Affair. The obligatory twist ending is another letdown. The twist is that the ending is more predictable than you predicted.

DVD Times Ratings

  • Overall: 
    6
    6 out of 10

Reader Ratings

  • Overall: 
    6.5

Comments

#1 Posted: 21-11-2004 16:38
K
das contributor
Posts: 919

Report this post
That poster is so 80's :)
Shame the film sounds rubbish.
------

www.koreancinemahouse.co.uk

Quote this post
#2 Posted: 21-11-2004 17:14
Richard Booth
Contributor & Filmmaker
Posts: 980

Report this post
It's a good, entertaining flick that doesn't outstay its welcome. (I also think that Ratner's a very competent director, judging by this material.)
------
We do not tell time, time only tells us.
Quote this post
#3 Posted: 21-11-2004 22:31
Phil Q
Member
Posts: 1817

Report this post
I think "very competent" is probably the best description of Brett Ratner as a director. Unfortunately, terms like "inspired", "creative", "imaginative", "visionary" and even "interesting" don't apply.

He's in there with the likes of Roger Spottiswoode, Joel Schumacher, Roger Donaldson and Renny Harlin. Fair enough, he makes a living.
Quote this post
#4 Posted: 21-11-2004 23:13
mkkbb
Member
Posts: 80

Report this post
I saw this last night and found it to be very entertaining. The chemistry between Brosnan and Harrelson is brilliant, and would love to see a sequel or similar film.

I could see them doing a remake of the odd couple, they're totally different but are really funny when they're together.
Quote this post
#5 Posted: 21-11-2004 23:59
Michael Mackenzie
Contributor
Posts: 1651

Report this post
Ratner, to me, is the epitomy of the "metteur en scene" as opposed to the auteur. He can put all the pieces of the puzzle together and he seems to run a tight ship, but I'd be very surprised if there is anything of himself in the films he directs. You could probably give him just about any project and he would do an acceptable job of putting it together, but I bet it wouldn't look any different than it would if done by any number of other "competent" directors.
------

Reviews | DVDs | My Web Site

Quote this post
#6 Posted: 22-11-2004 11:22
natski
Member/Contributor
Posts: 566

Report this post
I'm with MM on this, the guy's a bricklayer, no love, no vision, no magic.
Phil Q, no fair on the Schumacher comparison, yes he made the Batman horror, but he also made Phone Booth; the guy has got talent and a touch of dash in there too!
------

The 20 | Heat | Malcolm X

Quote this post
#7 Posted: 22-11-2004 11:52
Phil Q
Member
Posts: 1817

Report this post
I'll sort of concede the point on Schumacher, Natski. He has got some talent, but he spends most of his time working as a bricklayer. ;)
Quote this post
#8 Posted: 22-11-2004 14:51
Gary Couzens
Contributor
Posts: 377

Report this post
And I'd allow Roger Spottiswoode Under Fire...though I think screenwriter and second-unit director Ron Shelton deserves some credit.

As for Donaldson, he has been "interesting" more than once, especially with his earlier work in New Zealand. Like Geoff Murphy, he's too often been content with hackwork in Hollywood. Though Donaldson did make The Bounty and Marie, both worthwhile films. Then he made Cocktail. Enough said.
Quote this post
#9 Posted: 22-11-2004 14:55
natski
Member/Contributor
Posts: 566

Report this post
...plus an extra half point for Spottiswoode for editing 'Straw Dogs'!!!
---------------------------
An Insufferable Pedant
------

The 20 | Heat | Malcolm X

Quote this post
#10 Posted: 22-11-2004 16:11
Phil Q
Member
Posts: 1817

Report this post
Blimey, wish I hadn't started this! :p

Any Renny Harlin fans out there? (Actually I quite like some of his films myself, but I'm not going to attempt to make a case for Renny as auteur...)
Quote this post
#11 Posted: 22-11-2004 16:36
vennaro
Member
Posts: 101

Report this post
Donaldson also made Thirteen Days, one of the most intelligent political films in quite some time.

Quote this post
#12 Posted: 22-11-2004 17:05
Phil Q
Member
Posts: 1817

Report this post
He also made The Recruit, Dante's Peak and Species, three of the least intelligent (etc). And come on, the guy made Cocktail! That's unforgivable even if he's really nice to children and animals and donates 100% of his annual income to charity.

Seriously though, I didn't mention those names to say they're bad directors - they're good jobbing directors who just don't put much of an individual stamp on their films. They've made some bad films, they've made some good films, but none of 'em are Federico Fellini.
Quote this post
#13 Posted: 22-11-2004 18:35
bradavon
Banned
Posts: 2907

Report this post
Cocktail is good food but then again I could be biased to 80's movies. I much harder on tosh that is released today than I am with films from the 80's.

It's interesting people are saying Ratner (who IMO is a decent "blockbuster" director) puts none of himself in films as this is the opposite of what he thinks of himself and his films:

http://www.empireonline.co.uk/site/features/interviews/interviews.asp?IID=173
Quote this post
#14 Posted: 22-11-2004 18:57
Michael Mackenzie
Contributor
Posts: 1651

Report this post
From that interview:

Quote:
I definitely infuse my personality in my films. If you see all my movies – Rush Hour, Family Man, Red Dragon – you can always tell that they were made by me, even if they're completely different movies.


Um... no. :p

I suspect that all directors consider their films very personal. The problem is that what Ratner puts into "his" movies tends to have been cribbed from other movies - not necessarily a problem in itself, but it means that I have a hard time taking seriously his claims that his personality is all over his work. I have nothing against the guy - he seems a nice enough fellow from interviews and commentaries he's done - but I think he's getting a little ahead of himself.
------

Reviews | DVDs | My Web Site

Quote this post
#15 Posted: 23-11-2004 10:22
natski
Member/Contributor
Posts: 566

Report this post
For someone dating Serena Williams, his films lack bounce...
------

The 20 | Heat | Malcolm X

Quote this post
#16 Posted: 23-11-2004 11:40
Kevin O'Reilly
Contributor
Posts: 299

Report this post
That poster is so 80's

True and I like that they have Brosnan smoking on it. Brave of them in the current climate. Give it a couple of years and they'd probably have to make half the poster a health warning. :)
Quote this post